Category Archives: UK

Fire at Southampton halal food shop treated as arson

Posted on by Bob Pitt

Emdads Halal Food HallA blaze at a Southampton grocery store is being treated as arson, police have confirmed.

The incident at the Emdads Halal Food Hall, on Derby Road, St Mary’s resulted in 18 people being evacuated from their homes.

Residents were woken by an explosion and called the fire brigade around 4.50am, while one man living in a flat above the shop told how he was forced to jump from a first floor window to escape.

An 18-year-old man had arm burns, while another man was taken to hospital for treatment of a back injury and a three-month-old baby was checked for smoke inhalation.

Forensic investigation at the scene has continued today and police are appealing for witnesses.

Daily Echo, 28 January 2011

Liddle replies to Warsi

Posted on by Bob Pitt

Writing the current issue of the Spectator, Rod Liddle takes issue with Baroness Warsi’s criticism of his speech headlined “Islamophobia? Count me in!” Liddle objects that “she hadn’t heard, or read, the speech I made, or asked what I had meant. Condemning a speech solely because of its headline strikes me as being the very apogee of ‘shallow’.” Whereas Liddle’s bigoted ramblings are of course famous for their intellectual depth. So what did he say in his speech at the Evening Standard‘s “Is Islam good for London?” debate in November 2007? Liddle summarises:

My speech expressed a profound dislike of the ideology of Islam because it lends itself to a) homophobia, b) the subjugation of women, c) anti-semitism d) viciousness towards so-called apostates, e) authoritarianism and f) a somewhat medieval approach towards crime and punishment. And then there’s the barbarism of female circumcision, forced marriages and the notion that those who are not Muslims are not quite human, that their lives are worthless. These last three manifestations of Islamic thought are not universally present throughout the Islamic world, for sure. But the ideology facilitates them, offers them a weird sort of legitimacy.

The other manifestations of Islam I noted above, however, are universal within the Muslim world. OK, some Islamic states kill homosexuals while others merely imprison them. Some Islamic states merely loathe Jews, rather than loathing them and demanding their liquidation. Moderate Malaysia will put you in prison and take away your children for giving up your Islamic faith, while hardline Saudi Arabia will kill you. There are gradations of spite, violence, persecution and insecurity within Islam: but what there always is, beyond all doubt, is spite, violence, persecution and insecurity.

I was careful, in that speech to which she refers, to draw a distinction between Islam and Muslims….

You can imagine how it would go down with Britain’s Jewish community if Liddle delivered a speech headlined “Antisemitism? Count me in” in which he quoted bloodcurdling passages from the Torah, listed the atrocities committed by Israel as a self-proclaimed Jewish state and then concluded by observing that he drew a distinction between Judaism and Jews.

See Mehdi Hasan’s response to Liddle on his New Statesman blog.

Another Gilligan witch-hunt bites the dust

Posted on by Bob Pitt

Andrew Gilligan has a piece in the Sunday Telegraph continuing his campaign against ENGAGE.

Alas for Gilligan, it seems that the campaign isn’t going well. Kris Hopkins and Greville Janner, who buckled in the face of a witch-hunt initiated by Gilligan (“Islamists establish a bridgehead in Parliament”) and taken up by Paul Goodman and Martin Bright, and announced that they would recommend that the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia should remove ENGAGE from its position as the group’s secretariat, finally got round to consulting other members of the APPG. They found that their proposal to remove ENGAGE has no support. Gilligan reports:

Kris Hopkins, Tory MP for Keighley, and the Labour peer Lord Janner, quit the new All-Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia after failing to persuade their colleagues to sack a body called iEngage as the group’s secretariat.

iEngage, also known as Engage, is an organisation of Islamist sympathisers which has repeatedly defended extremists. Last year, it called on the Government to revoke a ban on a hardline foreign preacher who has said that “every Muslim should be a terrorist”.

The pass allows Mrs Bunglawala to enter Parliament without having to go through security checks and mix freely with ministers and MPs. It gives her the right to invite guests and to use Commons facilities. There is no suggestion that Mrs Bunglawala has been involved in any act of terrorism.

No, there’s just the weasel-worded accusation from Gilligan that ENGAGE supports extremists who advocate terrorism and that Shenaz Bunglawala represents some sort of security threat.

Gilligan isn’t meeting with much success in his self-appointed role as witchfinder general of Islamists, is he? Last year, you may recall, he intervened in the Tower Hamlets mayoral election to launch an attack on Lutfur Rahman, portraying him as a pawn of “Islamic fundamentalists” at the East London Mosque. The result was that Lutfur was elected as an independent candidate with a huge majority.

The moral for Muslims seems to be that if you want to win broad support, your best bet is to have Gilligan launch a campaign of baseless slander against you.

Islamophobia: does Labour measure up?

Posted on by Bob Pitt

Labour Briefing masthead

Does Labour measure up?

By Bob Pitt

Labour Briefing, February 2011

“The Islamophobia Myth” – that was the title of an influential article by Kenan Malik published in the February 2005 issue of Prospect magazine. It argued that violence, hatred and discrimination against Muslims were at a very low level and that the threat of Islamophobia had been invented or at least greatly exaggerated, mainly by religious leaders hoping to suppress legitimate criticisms of their beliefs and to enhance their own status as community representatives. Malik’s thesis was welcomed in some quarters at the time, including among sections of the left.

Six years on, far fewer people would buy that argument. Hostility towards Muslims and their faith has reached such a pitch that to deny this represents a major threat is simply untenable. When the racist hooligans of the English Defence League take to the streets in towns and cities across the UK brandishing placards with slogans such as “We will never submit to Islam”, chanting “Burn a mosque down” and on occasion breaking through police lines to rampage through Muslim areas smashing shop windows and assaulting passers-by, who could seriously claim that Islamophobia is a myth?

Continue reading →

Sikhs Against the EDL backs ‘Love Leicester, Hate Racism’ demonstration

Posted on by Bob Pitt

Sikhs Against EDL (2)

Sikhs Against the EDL press release

The racist and fascist EDL want to march in Leicester this Saturday, 4th February, to spread their racist poison.

To counter their unwanted presence and to stop them intimidating the local communities the antiracists will also take to the streets on the same day.

This is the second time in less than two years that the EDL thugs want to stir up racism and divisions among the city’s diverse community. Last time when they showed up in October 2010, they caused much violence and disruption.

Continue reading →

Douglas Murray welcomes the EDL as ‘a grassroots response from non-Muslims to Islamism’

Posted on by Bob Pitt

On 26 January the Worker-Communist Party of Iran’s front organisation, One Law for All, held a seminar at Conway Hall in London under the title “Enemies not Allies”, the purported aim of which was to repudiate both far-right organisations who use opposition to Islam to promote hatred of Muslims and also left-wingers who have worked with Islamists to resist racism and imperialist war. As the publicity for the seminar put it: “Bigots and neo-Nazis feigning to campaign for rights… ‘anti-racist’ groups promoting fascism… ‘anti-war’ rallies run by supporters of terrorism and dictatorship… Enough!”

The rejection of “bigots and neo-Nazis feigning to campaign for rights” didn’t go down too well with one of the platform speakers, however. Douglas Murray, Director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, couldn’t see why it was wrong for more mainstream right-wing Islamophobes such as himself to express solidarity with the likes of the EDL. As Murray put it:

“The English Defence League when they started protesting had banners saying things like ‘Sharia law discriminates against women’, ‘Sharia law is anti-gay’. Well I’m good with both of those sentiments, I’m sure most people in this room are. If you’re ever going to have a grassroots response from non-Muslims to Islamism that would be how you’d want it, surely.”

Continue reading →

Latest issue of Arches Quarterly – out now

Posted on by Bob Pitt

Arches Winter 2010Arches Quarterly – Volume 4 Edition 7

Latest Issue – Islamophobia and Anti Muslim Hatred

The Cordoba Foundation presents its Winter 2010 edition of Arches Quarterly, a journal providing nuanced analysis of the issues and developments in the arena of dialogue, civilizations, and a rapprochement between Islam and the West.

In this edition, Arches Quarterlyresponds to the rising levels of anti-Muslim hatred across the globe. Commonly referred to as “Islamophobia”, contributors discuss among other things, conceptual challenges posed by the term, the location of it in the racial imperial-colonial matrix and by providing examples from across the world, show that it is a reality in today’s climate. The issue also explores the responsibility of Muslim civil society to combat internal and external challenges.

In this edition:

Islamophobia and Terrorism: Impediments to the Culture of Peace — Prof Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu

Contemporary Islamophobia Before 9/11: A Brief History — Dr Chris Allen

Islamophobia and Hispanophobia: How They Came Together in the Euro-American Imagination — Walter D. Mignolo

Islamophobia & Anti-Semitism: History and Possibility — Rabbi Reuven Firestone

Islamophobia, Mimetic Warfare and the Bugaboo of Shari’a Compliance: Counter-Strategies for Common Ground – Dr Robert D. Crane

The New McCarthyism in Europe — Liz Fekete

Sweden and Anti-Muslim Hysteria — Kristoffer Larsson

Sole Protector, of What? Unpacking Turkey’s Anti-Muslim Policies — Dr Merve Kavakci Islam

Will Europe Surrender to Selective Racism? An Interpretative Model of a Worsening Phenomenon — Hossam Shaker

Muslims in the Polish Media: The New Folk Devil? — Dr Konrad Pedziwiatr

Islamophobia: A Deep-Rooted Phenomenon — Marwan Muhammad

Situating Anti-Muslim Hatred in Contemporary Indian Society —Ram Puniyani

The Defence of Omar Khadr in the Age of Islamophobia — Dennis Edney

Analysing the Growing Scepticism Towards the Idea of Islamophobia — Dr Nasar Meer and Professor Tariq Modood

British Muslim Organisations: The Target of an Orchestrated Neocon Campaign of Denigration — Dr Robert Lambert

South African Muslims Over Three Centuries: From the Jaws of Islamophobia to the Joys of Equality — Ebrahim Rasool

Download Arches Quarterly here

To order a hard copy of Arches, click here

Resisting the Islamification of Saffron Walden

Posted on by Bob Pitt

Jim FordMeat sold at Waitrose has come under fire from Christian members of the community because it is slaughtered in accordance with Muslim laws. Concerns have been raised because food packaging does not display the fact that most ranges of lamb sold at the Saffron Walden superstore conform to Halal.

Little Walden Road resident and loyal customer Jim Ford, pictured, explained that he feels like he is being forced to eat meat which “violates” his consciousness. “While I have respect for the rights of Muslims to worship in freedom,” he said. “As a Christian I do object to being in effect forced to eat meat blessed in this way.”

Halal means that the meat is blessed and can be eaten by people following the Islamic faith. Animals are slaughtered with a swift, deep incision with a sharp knife across the neck, cutting through the windpipe, the food pipe, nerves, and the jugular but leaving the spinal cord intact.

However a Waitrose statement highlighted that they now also stock Organic, West Country, and English & Dorset Breed lamb available from the service meat counters. All do not receive a Halal blessing at the point of slaughter.

A spokesman added: “All Waitrose pre-packed New Zealand Lamb continues to receive a Halal blessing at slaughter. We continue to allow the blessing so that abattoirs can sell the parts of the carcass that we don’t use. In New Zealand, a significant amount of this meat is destined for markets in Asia – this minimises food waste, keeps prices down for our customers and helps our farmers to be competitive.

“Animal welfare is our highest priority and it is important to note that all of our lamb, whether Halal blessed or not, is stunned at slaughter rendering the animal insensitive to pain. We do not allow the slaughter of any livestock without proper humane stunning and in this regard we are monitored by the Humane Slaughter Association.”

Saffron Walden Reporter, 28 January 2011

As the article points out, halal meat produced in New Zealand is all from animals that have been stunned before slaughter. So the usual spurious complaints about animal cruelty don’t apply. The sole cause for objection here is that an Islamic prayer is recited over the animal as it is killed.

Posted in UK

EDL man’s home ‘targeted by shotgun-wielding attacker’

Posted on by Bob Pitt

EDL at 9-11 protestThus the headline to a report in the Metro of an alleged attack on the house of Kevin Carroll, joint leader of the gang of racist hooligans known as the English Defence League.

You might have thought that the paper would have shown a bit more scepticism about the allegation, given that the only witness to the “shotgun-wielding attacker” was Carroll himself and that his account has been exploited by the EDL in order to whip up outrage among its sympathisers and mobilise support for its planned anti-Muslim protest in Luton on 5 February.

Yet the Metro happily gives credence to the claim by EDL members that the supposed attack “may have been an attempt to disrupt the Luton demonstration” and quotes EDL co-leader Stephen Lennon as declaring: “They won’t stop us, we will continue. We will defend ourselves. Luton demo would still go ahead… even if one of us was killed! As always, no surrender, not now not ever.”

See Nick Lowles’ comments at Hope not Hate.