No surrender? EDL hooligans deny EDL membership

EDL_No_SurrenderA man arrested during an English Defence League demonstration in April has escaped a prison sentence.

Lee Stubbs, of Kings Avenue, Queensbury, was stopped by police after being spotted with a knuckleduster during the rally on April 16. The weapon was attached to his belt when he was arrested on Hall Street, behind police lines which had formed to keep the EDL in the town centre.

The 23-year-old said he had been using the knuckleduster as a belt buckle and had no intention of using it as a weapon. He admitted a charge of possessing an offensive weapon but insisted he was not a member of the EDL.

Calderdale Magistrates heard how Stubbs had entered Halifax to drink with friends but didn’t realise an EDL demonstration was taking place until he arrived in the town.

Halifax Courier, 14 July 2011

Police were drafted in after an English Defence League football match was organised on a pitch normally used by Asian youths.

Blackburn magistrates heard shortly after the EDL game, involving 20 to 25 white males, started, about 30 Asian males arrived at the concrete pitches in Queens Park. The two groups were playing on adjoining pitches but tempers flared and words were exchanged when the ball from the Asian game went over to the other side.

Nicholas John Smyth, 26, of Sherwood Road, Blackburn, pleaded guilty to using racially-aggravated threatening behaviour. He was given a conditional discharge for 12 months and ordered to pay £85 costs.

Jonathan Taylor, defending, said Smyth had gone to play football with a few friends. He realised there were members of the EDL there, although he was not a member of the organisation.

Lancashire Evening Telegraph, 15 July 2011

Wilders serves freedom’s cause

Geoffrey AldermanWell, that’s the view of Geoffrey Alderman, writing in the Jewish Chronicle. But don’t get the idea that Alderman is entirely uncritical of the Dutch far-right anti-Muslim racist.

Alderman applauds Wilders for being “absolutely unrepentant – and unrelenting – in his insistence on telling the truth about militant Islam”. And he continues:

“The very public statements that landed him in court included the challenging assertion that ‘Islam is a fascist ideology’ and the equally provocative allegations that ‘Islam and freedom, Islam and democracy are not compatible.’ Each of these statements is credible (or at least plausible) and each can be supported by evidence.”

On the other hand, in supporting a ban on ritual slaughter, which would result in the illegalisation of shechita, Wilders “has displayed a limited vision that does neither him nor his party any credit”. As Alderman explains:

“Shechita is in peril in the Netherlands partly because of the propaganda put out by the Freedom party against religious slaughter of food animals, which most Dutch people take to mean Muslim slaughter. In a frenzy of passion against Islam, the Dutch have punished the Jews.”

Whereas, in Alderman’s view, the Dutch should lay off the Jews and stick to punishing the Muslims.

Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain backs opponents of Murfreesboro Islamic Center

Murfreesboro mosque protestMURFREESBORO, Tenn. — Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain opposes a planned Tennessee mosque that has been the subject of protests and legal challenges.

Cain didn’t bring up the controversial facility in a campaign rally on Thursday, but told reporters afterward that he’s concerned about the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro. “It is an infringement and an abuse of our freedom of religion,” he said. “And I don’t agree with what’s happening, because this isn’t an innocent mosque.”

The new mosque has been the subject of protests and counterprotests in the city about 35 miles southeast of Nashville. A county judge ruled in May that the mosque construction does not harm the residents who sued to try to stop it, but he allowed them to move forward on claims the county violated an open meetings law in approving it.

Opponents have used the hearings to argue that the mosque is part of a plot to expand Islamic extremism in the U.S. Cain appeared to agree. “It is another example of why I believe in American laws and American courts,” Cain said. “This is just another way to try to gradually sneak Shariah law into our laws, and I absolutely object to that.”

Huffington Post, 14 July 2011

See also Adam Serwer, “Herman Cain winning the anti-Muslim primary hands down”, The Plum Line, 15 July 2011

71-year-old Muslim seriously assaulted outside Kilmarnock mosque

Police at Kilmarnock are continuing enquiries and appealing for information after an elderly man was seriously assaulted in the early hours of Friday 15 July 2011.

The 71-year-old Asian man was discovered with serious facial injuries around 0130 hrs on Friday 15 July 2011 outside the Community Mosque in Hill Street, Kilmarnock. It is believed that he was attacked prior to opening the Mosque for a prayer session and was discovered by two fellow members of the Mosque who informed the emergency services.

The injured man was taken by ambulance to Crosshouse Hospital where he is currently being treated for his injuries. Hospital staff describe his condition as stable.

Continue reading

‘It’s a white country, not a Muslim state’, BNP supporter told Asian neighbours

Nigel HesmondhalghA man who made his Asian next door neighbours’ lives a misery with his anti-social and racist conduct was spared immediate jail.

Burnley Crown Court heard how Nigel Hesmondhalgh, 36, who had a British National Party sticker in the window of his Accrington home, was abusive and insulting to the couple, repeatedly picking on the wife. He piled dog dirt up in the alley outside their home and told them: “It’s a white country, not a Muslim state.”

Hesmondhalgh, said to be the carer for his brother, who has learning difficulties, told the husband of the couple he should be scared and shouted support for the BNP. The couple had lived in their home for 14 years before he moved in.

The defendant, of Stanley Street, Accrington, was given 36 weeks in custody, suspended for two years, with 18 months supervision and the Thinking Skills programme. Martin Hackett, defending, said Hesmondhalgh had been very close to his mother who died last July and he may have been adjusting.

Lancashire Telegraph, 13 July 2009


Consulting Hesmondhalgh’s Bebo profile, we find him indignantly denying that any racist language was directed against his neighbours – a claim rather undermined by the accompanying messages Nigel Hesmondhalgh says:”Kill All The Fuckin Pakkis”and What Is The Difference Between A Tea Towel And A Baseball Bat? FUCK ALL The Both Wrap Nicely Round A Pakkis Head.

And this thug has escaped a prison sentence.

Fife man sentenced for attack on Muslim woman

A Fife drug addict who assaulted a Muslim woman by pulling a burka from her head has been sent to jail. Duncan Gandy grabbed the woman’s burka as she walked through the Kingdom Shopping Centre in Glenrothes last month, leaving her extremely distressed.

Sheriff Grant McCulloch told the 31-year-old accused, who was under the influence of drugs and alcohol at the time of the incident, that custody was the only appropriate sentence for what he termed an offensive, frightening and demeaning attack.

Gandy, of Provosts Land, Leslie, appeared at Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court on Tuesday after previously admitting assaulting Shaheen Khan by pulling her burka from her face and head. He was sentenced to 135 days in prison for the attack. He also admitted breaching bail conditions, for which he was sentenced to an additional 60 days.

Sheriff McCulloch pointed out that the accused had admitted a racially-aggravated assault, and added, “Suddenly, without warning, you pulled the burka from her face. That was clearly offensive, clearly frightening and clearly demeaning for her.

“There is no mitigation that can be put forward other than the fact you were under the influence of illegal substances. That, in my view, is an aggravation not a mitigation and I take the view that only a custodial sentence is appropriate.”

The sheriff said the sentence would have been 180 days had it not been for Gandy’s early guilty plea.

His jail term was welcomed by a Fife organisation promoting racial equality and awareness. Naeem Khalid, co-ordinator of Fairness, Race Awareness and Equality (FRAE) Fife, said Gandy had committed an attack on a vulnerable woman as well as on her faith.

“Everyone’s religion should be respected,” he said. “This was a disappointing event and there needs to be redress towards that. People must have the freedom to practice their religion and the freedom to express that.

“The burka is a principle of her faith and, for me, to remove that is attacking her faith and belief. She was a vulnerable female and the attack will have other repercussions as it will affect her confidence to walk in public.”

The Courier, 13 July 2011

Via ENGAGE

‘Forgotten’ terror suspect from Tooting nears five years in prison

Free Talha AhsanThe family of Tooting’s ‘forgotten’ terror suspect, who remains in jail without trial, are preparing to mark the fifth anniversary of his imprisonment.

Syed Talha Ahsan – a 31-year-old writer with Asperger syndrome – was arrested at his home in Franciscan Road, Tooting, on July 19, 2007, after US authorities requested his extradition. He is accused in the US of terrorism-related offences arising out of an alleged involvement with a series of websites between 1997 and 2004. Mr Ahsan’s case is linked to that of Babar Ahmad – but he has received much less media attention than Mr Ahmad, who was arrested in 2003 and is also still in prison.

Mr Ahsan, who graduated from the School of Oriental and African Studies with a First in Arabic, has never been charged or tried in this country. He is currently in the final stage of proceedings at the European Courts of Human Rights – fighting against extradition.

Speaking to the Wandsworth Guardian this week, Mr Ahsan’s 73-year-old father, Syed Abu Ahsan, said the family was “very very depressed” about the situation, adding he did not hold out much hope his son’s case would be resolved soon. He said: “Nobody is above America. If they say something nobody dares to say differently.”

But Mr Ahsan’s family continue to lobby the Home Secretary to give him a fair trial in the UK, giving special consideration to his medical conditions. On July 19, they will be at the Islamic Human Rights Commission bookshop, in Wembley, where supporters will give readings from a book of poetry Mr Ahsan has written and had published while in Long Lartin Prison.

Mr Ahsan’s MP, Sadiq Khan, who has spoken out about Mr Ahmad’s case in the past, said: “It is extremely distressing for Mr Ahsan’s family that this case continues to drag on. I have met with the Extradition Minister to discuss this case and the case of Babar Ahmad. Although the Government is reviewing its policy on extradition to the United States, they have told me it is unlikely to cover existing cases, which is bad news for the family. I am hopeful that the European Court of Human Rights will make a judgement soon on the case.”

A spokeswoman for the Home Office had not responded to any queries as this week’s paper went to press.

For more information visit freetalha.org

Wandsworth Guardian, 13 July 2014

Lies, damned lies and statistics – misinterpreting the homophobic hate crime figures for Tower Hamlets

In an article published in yesterday’s Guardian, Jack Gilbert of Rainbow Hamlets, the Tower Hamlets LGBT community forum, writes: “In June, we obtained a month-by-month analysis of homophobic crime figures in the borough. It reveals that incidents in Tower Hamlets have risen by a third (33%) between April 2009-March 2010 and April 2010-March 2011, much more than the 21% widely reported in the media.”

The reported 21% rise over that 2009-11 period was based on earlier figures provided by the Metropolitan Police which showed that recorded homophobic crimes in Tower Hamlets had increased from 67 to 81. The Met’s statistics are being continuously revised, and if we look at the latest figures to which Jack Gilbert refers we find that the numbers now show a rise to 81 from 61, which does indeed give an increase of 33%.

However, as you can see, the reason for this higher percentage change is not that the Met’s figure for homophobic crimes in Tower Hamlets during 2010-11 has increased, but rather that the figure for 2009-10 has been revised downwards. Which means that the total figure for homophobic crimes over the period 2009-11 has also been reduced – from 148 to 142. Using these figures to suggest that homophobic crimes in Tower Hamlets are at a higher level than has been reported is disingenuous to say the least.

It would also be interesting to see the 2008-9 figure for comparison, because it seems possible in view of the latest statistics for 2009-10 that the level of recorded homophobic crime in Tower Hamlets might even have fallen over the 2008-10 period, or at least that any increase was lower than previously thought.

The reason why a longer time-frame would be useful in assessing the actual development of homophobic crime levels in Tower Hamlets is that over shorter periods the statistics often show sharp percentage changes for no obvious reason. This becomes clear if you break down the figures for the period from April 2009 to March 2011 into six-month rather than one-year segments.

Between April and September 2009 there were 38 recorded homophobic hate crimes in Tower Hamlets. Over the next six months, October 2009 to March 2010, the figure came down to 23 – a fall of almost 40%. In the following six months, April to September 2010, the figure rose to 46 – an increase of 100%. It then fell to 35 during the six months between October 2010 and March 2011 – a decline of 24%.

It seems highly unlikely that such wild fluctuations reflect the actual rise and fall of homophobia in Tower Hamlets. It’s just that when you are dealing with relatively low figures like these even small numerical changes produce dramatic-looking percentage shifts. Nor do the statistics show that the level of homophobic crime in Tower Hamlets at the end of the two-year period from April 2009 to March 2011 was any higher than at the beginning, as the figure for the final six months is slightly down on that for the first six months (35 as against 38).

The problem is that when people are intent on “proving” that there has been a dangerous increase in homophobia in Tower Hamlets they just interpret the statistics to justify their own prejudices.

The recent notorious Homintern statement denouncing rising homophobia in the borough gave headline prominence to the 21% figure. However, an earlier version of the same statement, published under Andy Tippetts’ name on the National Secular Society website, took the view that there might have been a fall in homophobic crime in Tower Hamlets – but argued that this was because “there are many gay people who have been forced out of the borough, unable to cope with the harassment”. So, according to this reasoning, if there has been an increase in anti-gay crime in Tower Hamlets, that shows a rise in homophobia, and if there has been a fall in anti-gay crime in the borough that shows a rise in homophobia too!

The purpose of exaggerating the level of homophobia in Tower Hamlets is of course to imply that Muslims are primarily responsible for anti-gay hatred in the borough. But the statistics that are available do not bear that out. The only figures I have seen are for violent homophobic crime in Tower Hamlets over the three-year period 2006/7 to 2008/9. These show that 36% of such crimes were committed by people of Bangladeshi heritage, who form 33% of the total population of Tower Hamlets according to the last available census figures. So there is no evidence that Muslims are mainly or disproportionately responsible for homophobic violence in the borough.

Now, it may be that over the past two years there has been a big surge in the proportion of homophobic crimes in Tower Hamlets committed by Muslims. But unless they can produce any evidence that this is the case, LGBT organisations would be advised to avoid giving credence to accusations that have a basis in Islamophobic mythology rather than facts.

And while we’re on the subject of statistics, it would be helpful if those who blame the East London Mosque for the supposed rise in homophobia among local Muslims could provide a figure for the number of speakers who have used the mosque as a platform to preach hostility towards the LGBT community.

In his Guardian article Jack Gilbert argues that the ELM “has accepted it has hosted at least one homophobic speaker, Abdul Karim Hattin, in 2007, whose Spot the Fag lecture was featured on Channel 4’s Dispatches programme”. This lecture was delivered at an event organised by an outside body who had hired a conference room at the London Muslim Centre. And, as Gilbert notes, the ELM’s website now states firmly that “those hate preachers who circumvented our bookings policy in the past are now barred; our vetting procedures for speakers and guests appearing at our mosque and centre have been significantly tightened over the past year”.

The basis on which Islamophobes like the signatories to the Homintern statement justify their charge that the East London Mosque is guilty of “allowing its premises to be used to promote gayhate campaigns” is to compile a list of preachers who have spoken at the mosque over the years, together with homophobic statements these preachers are alleged to have made. But nobody, so far as I’m aware, has claimed that any of these alleged statements, with the sole exception of Abdul Karim Hattin’s 2007 lecture, were actually made at the ELM itself.

In short, the answer to the question of how many speakers have used the East London Mosque as a platform to preach hostility towards the LGBT community would appear to be – one, four years ago, at an event booked by an outside body, and he’s now been banned.

Arson attack on Accrington mosque

Accrington mosque arson attackFour blazes were started in Accrington today (13 July) in an arson spree which spread to a mosque.

Firefighters tackled the most serious fire at the Faizane Madina Mosque in Richmond Road after flames from a nearby shed containing three gas cylinders spread.

Dozens of firefighters from Great Harwood and Haslingden raced to the scene at just before 3.30am as crews from Accrington Fire Station were busy fighting another arson blaze in Fairfield Street.

The fire began to spread to the place of worship as crews fought to keep the propane gas cylinders cool with jets of water. Crews remained at the scene for more than four hours battling the blaze and the people living closest to the mosque had to be evacuated from their home.

And as firefighters began to breathe a “sigh of relief”, believing they had the situation under control, a mains gas pipe leading to the mosque ruptured. Engineers from the National Grid were called to the area and it was cordoned off immediately as they tried to bring the leak under control. The mosque suffered damage to its wall, roof and windows.

Nabeela Kashif, who lives next door, said she saw black smoke pouring in through her bathroom window. The 40-year-old, who was evacuated with her husband, Kashif, 39, and their five-year-old son, Ibrahim, said: “I woke up after I heard a noise and when I looked out of the window we saw a huge fire. It was a really scary experience and the firefighters told us all to leave the house.”

Asian Image, 13 July 2011

Update:  Expose has a screenshot of EDL members’ responses to the attack.

Gay magazine boosts English Defence League

EDL article

The July issue of the gay magazine Out in the City includes a feature article on the English Defence League by James Montague, based on his participation in a couple of EDL protests back in November last year. Masquerading as a piece of investigative journalism, Montague’s article is little more than an extended puff piece for a gang of violent anti-Muslim racists.

The article is a rewrite of a piece that first appeared at the end of last year in a publication called Delayed Gratification, under the title “On the march with the English Defence League”. And even though it has been slightly updated – notably with the addition of a reference to the dispute over a planned East End Pride march earlier this year – much of it has been by-passed by subsequent developments. Which raises the question of why Out in the Citydecided to splash this piece of second-hand pro-EDL propaganda across four pages of its current issue.

Perhaps the answer is to be found in the standfirst to the article, which refers to the cancellation of the East End Pride march “amid claims that one of its organisers had links to the English Defence League”. It looks like Out in the City readers are being invited to conclude, on the basis of Montague’s largely favourable report, that the EDL aren’t so bad really and that the opposition to East End Pride because of its organisers’ far-right connections was an overreaction. (It is worth noting that Linda Riley of Square Peg Media, the magazine’s publishers, was a signatory to the notorious Islamophobic Homintern statement that falsely accused the East London Mosque of responsibility for a rise in homophobic attacks in Tower Hamlets.)

Montague’s portrait of the EDL centres on a leader of the organisation’s LGBT division, who is referred to only as Joe (presumably the individual who operates under the name Joe Bloggs and reportedly had a hand in setting up both the LGBT and Jewish divisions). He is allowed to spout his pro-EDL bullshit without challenge. Joe, we are told, “believes that what he sees as the growing Islamification of Britain is the biggest threat that the country’s gay community has ever faced”. Montague doesn’t bother to point out that the “Islamification” of a country in which non-Muslims make up 97% of the population is nothing more than a paranoid racist fantasy. In the section on East End Pride, Joe is provided with a platform to denounce the cancellation of the march and declare that “one of the biggest enemies to warning the gay community about the dangers of Islamic extremism has been the liberal gay community”.

Some of Joe’s claims are so outlandish as to provoke incredulous laughter. “We are standing up for tolerance, diversity and human rights”, Montague reports him as saying. A quick scroll through the endless stream of hate-filled rants and open threats of anti-Muslim violence that fill the EDL’s Facebook page would have shown Montague the absurdity of that claim. (See for example this selection of comments by EDL supporters in response to the TV programme Does Britain have a problem with Muslims?) But the nearest we get to an exposure of the EDL’s endemic racism is a reference to two of its supporters shouting “Pakis” at a group of Asian youths. Montague merely observes: “Occasionally, though, the self-aware political correctness slipped.”

Montague even uncritically repeats Joe’s assertion that fascists have been “weeded out” of the EDL. But it wouldn’t have taken any in-depth research to expose the spurious character of this claim too. In October 2010 Searchlight published a detailed analysis of the far-right background of prominent figures in the EDL. And earlier that year the BNP links of EDL leader “Tommy Robinson” (Stephen Yaxley Lennon) and his cousin, current EDL co-leader Kevin Carroll, had been exposed by Searchlight and Three Counties Unity. Indeed, at the beginning of November 2010, the same month that Montague joined the EDL at its protests in London and Nuneaton, Three Counties Unity posted a photo of Lennon at a BNP meeting in 2007 listening intently to a speech by veteran neo-Nazi Richard Edmonds. Yet Montague chooses to ignore all this.

Montague also provides a sympathetic profile Roberta Moore, the then leader of the EDL’s Jewish division and a friend of Joe’s (in December 2010 the two of them were among a group of EDLers who disrupted a One Society Many Cultures conference in London). Like Joe, Moore is allowed to recite her lies without any critical questioning from Montague. He quotes Moore as saying that the EDL are “fighting against the prejudice against women, Jews, Hindus, gays, anyone. It’s not Islam. We are against Islamists.” This is from a woman who is on record as stating: “We are anti-Islam, as everyone should be. Islam is not a religion, but a cult. It has all the features of a cult, like the religions of Jim Jones and David Koresh.” Needless to say, Montague has no interest in highlighting that discrepancy.

Nor does Montague think it worth mentioning that earlier this year Moore had a public falling out with the EDL leadership over her support for the Jewish Task Force, a far-right Zionist group in the US led by a convicted terrorist. The EDL papered over that difference but just recently the compromise collapsed when Moore resigned from the EDL to take up what appears to be a job offerfrom the SIOA/SIOE “counter-jihadist” alliance headed by Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and Anders Gravers. Moore justified her decision to leave the EDL by claiming that she was opposed to the growing influence within the organisation of the very Nazi elements that her friend Joe had assured Montague were being “weeded out” of the EDL.

One particular individual Moore had in mind was Hel Gower, the head of EDL admin and PA to the EDL leadership. Gower is an admirer of the British First Party, which is the political wing of an openly Nazi groupuscule called the November 9th Society (opinions differ over whether the date is a reference to Kristallnacht, the Bierhalle Putsch, or both). But who is Moore to come over all indignant about her opponents’ associations with neo-Nazism? She herself was a founding committee member and co-chairperson of another far-right groupuscule, the English Nationalist Alliance, which the EDL leadership proscribed earlier this year on the grounds that ENA chairperson Bill Baker has “links with Nazi groups like Combat 18 and Redwatch”.

Moore hasn’t just fallen out with the EDL leadership but with her friend “Joe Bloggs”, who sided with the leadership in the split. He has complained that he was denounced by a leading supporter of Moore in the EDL Jewish division as a “retarded, dhimmi, kapo, Nazi turd”, adding that “it is that type of insane response that leads others to be hostile to the Jewish Division”. So the picture painted by Montague of an EDL based on a stern rejection of fascism and featuring a cosy relationship between its LGBT and Jewish divisions rather falls apart, doesn’t it? The Jewish division now claims that the EDL has been taken over by Nazis and denounces the founder of the LGBT division in the most vitriolic terms, while the latter accuses the Jewish division of insanity.

Hopefully this will encourage the LGBT community to treat Montague’s disgraceful apologia for the EDL, along with the editorial team who decided to publish it in Out in the City, with the contempt they both deserve.