Gay magazine boosts English Defence League

EDL article

The July issue of the gay magazine Out in the City includes a feature article on the English Defence League by James Montague, based on his participation in a couple of EDL protests back in November last year. Masquerading as a piece of investigative journalism, Montague’s article is little more than an extended puff piece for a gang of violent anti-Muslim racists.

The article is a rewrite of a piece that first appeared at the end of last year in a publication called Delayed Gratification, under the title “On the march with the English Defence League”. And even though it has been slightly updated – notably with the addition of a reference to the dispute over a planned East End Pride march earlier this year – much of it has been by-passed by subsequent developments. Which raises the question of why Out in the Citydecided to splash this piece of second-hand pro-EDL propaganda across four pages of its current issue.

Perhaps the answer is to be found in the standfirst to the article, which refers to the cancellation of the East End Pride march “amid claims that one of its organisers had links to the English Defence League”. It looks like Out in the City readers are being invited to conclude, on the basis of Montague’s largely favourable report, that the EDL aren’t so bad really and that the opposition to East End Pride because of its organisers’ far-right connections was an overreaction. (It is worth noting that Linda Riley of Square Peg Media, the magazine’s publishers, was a signatory to the notorious Islamophobic Homintern statement that falsely accused the East London Mosque of responsibility for a rise in homophobic attacks in Tower Hamlets.)

Montague’s portrait of the EDL centres on a leader of the organisation’s LGBT division, who is referred to only as Joe (presumably the individual who operates under the name Joe Bloggs and reportedly had a hand in setting up both the LGBT and Jewish divisions). He is allowed to spout his pro-EDL bullshit without challenge. Joe, we are told, “believes that what he sees as the growing Islamification of Britain is the biggest threat that the country’s gay community has ever faced”. Montague doesn’t bother to point out that the “Islamification” of a country in which non-Muslims make up 97% of the population is nothing more than a paranoid racist fantasy. In the section on East End Pride, Joe is provided with a platform to denounce the cancellation of the march and declare that “one of the biggest enemies to warning the gay community about the dangers of Islamic extremism has been the liberal gay community”.

Some of Joe’s claims are so outlandish as to provoke incredulous laughter. “We are standing up for tolerance, diversity and human rights”, Montague reports him as saying. A quick scroll through the endless stream of hate-filled rants and open threats of anti-Muslim violence that fill the EDL’s Facebook page would have shown Montague the absurdity of that claim. (See for example this selection of comments by EDL supporters in response to the TV programme Does Britain have a problem with Muslims?) But the nearest we get to an exposure of the EDL’s endemic racism is a reference to two of its supporters shouting “Pakis” at a group of Asian youths. Montague merely observes: “Occasionally, though, the self-aware political correctness slipped.”

Montague even uncritically repeats Joe’s assertion that fascists have been “weeded out” of the EDL. But it wouldn’t have taken any in-depth research to expose the spurious character of this claim too. In October 2010 Searchlight published a detailed analysis of the far-right background of prominent figures in the EDL. And earlier that year the BNP links of EDL leader “Tommy Robinson” (Stephen Yaxley Lennon) and his cousin, current EDL co-leader Kevin Carroll, had been exposed by Searchlight and Three Counties Unity. Indeed, at the beginning of November 2010, the same month that Montague joined the EDL at its protests in London and Nuneaton, Three Counties Unity posted a photo of Lennon at a BNP meeting in 2007 listening intently to a speech by veteran neo-Nazi Richard Edmonds. Yet Montague chooses to ignore all this.

Montague also provides a sympathetic profile Roberta Moore, the then leader of the EDL’s Jewish division and a friend of Joe’s (in December 2010 the two of them were among a group of EDLers who disrupted a One Society Many Cultures conference in London). Like Joe, Moore is allowed to recite her lies without any critical questioning from Montague. He quotes Moore as saying that the EDL are “fighting against the prejudice against women, Jews, Hindus, gays, anyone. It’s not Islam. We are against Islamists.” This is from a woman who is on record as stating: “We are anti-Islam, as everyone should be. Islam is not a religion, but a cult. It has all the features of a cult, like the religions of Jim Jones and David Koresh.” Needless to say, Montague has no interest in highlighting that discrepancy.

Nor does Montague think it worth mentioning that earlier this year Moore had a public falling out with the EDL leadership over her support for the Jewish Task Force, a far-right Zionist group in the US led by a convicted terrorist. The EDL papered over that difference but just recently the compromise collapsed when Moore resigned from the EDL to take up what appears to be a job offerfrom the SIOA/SIOE “counter-jihadist” alliance headed by Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and Anders Gravers. Moore justified her decision to leave the EDL by claiming that she was opposed to the growing influence within the organisation of the very Nazi elements that her friend Joe had assured Montague were being “weeded out” of the EDL.

One particular individual Moore had in mind was Hel Gower, the head of EDL admin and PA to the EDL leadership. Gower is an admirer of the British First Party, which is the political wing of an openly Nazi groupuscule called the November 9th Society (opinions differ over whether the date is a reference to Kristallnacht, the Bierhalle Putsch, or both). But who is Moore to come over all indignant about her opponents’ associations with neo-Nazism? She herself was a founding committee member and co-chairperson of another far-right groupuscule, the English Nationalist Alliance, which the EDL leadership proscribed earlier this year on the grounds that ENA chairperson Bill Baker has “links with Nazi groups like Combat 18 and Redwatch”.

Moore hasn’t just fallen out with the EDL leadership but with her friend “Joe Bloggs”, who sided with the leadership in the split. He has complained that he was denounced by a leading supporter of Moore in the EDL Jewish division as a “retarded, dhimmi, kapo, Nazi turd”, adding that “it is that type of insane response that leads others to be hostile to the Jewish Division”. So the picture painted by Montague of an EDL based on a stern rejection of fascism and featuring a cosy relationship between its LGBT and Jewish divisions rather falls apart, doesn’t it? The Jewish division now claims that the EDL has been taken over by Nazis and denounces the founder of the LGBT division in the most vitriolic terms, while the latter accuses the Jewish division of insanity.

Hopefully this will encourage the LGBT community to treat Montague’s disgraceful apologia for the EDL, along with the editorial team who decided to publish it in Out in the City, with the contempt they both deserve.

Community support for Blackpool mosque

Noor-A-Madina mosqueA community turned out in force to show their support for a mosque which has become the subject of an English Defence League campaign.

Members of the Noor-A-Madina mosque on Waterloo Road were joined by the North West branch of United Against Fascism, the Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre Trade Union Council and Blackpool Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT).

All of the people present were there to show defiance to the EDL, a group which one UAF member claims is “trying to whip up racism”.

Continue reading

Peter Tatchell joins campaign to suppress Hizb ut-Tahrir’s right to free speech

Joel_TitusPeter Tatchell has announced that he will be joining a demonstration against Hizb ut-Tahrir’s International Khilafah Conference at the Water Lily Centre in Tower Hamlets on Saturday.

The demonstration has been organised by a new group called the Anti-Extremism Alliance, which has already issued an Open letter to Tower Hamlets Council and East London Advertiser demanding that the Water Lily cancel the booking.

You might wonder how an avowed defender of free expression like Tatchell got involved in this. As we have previously pointed out, he holds the formal position that “freedom of speech is so precious that it must be defended, even when we disagree with the sentiments expressed” and “should be limited only in exceptional circumstances – when it slips into inciting violence and murder”. And nobody supposes that Hizb ut-Tahrir will be using Saturday’s conference to advocate violence or murder. We can only conclude that Tatchell’s absolute commitment to free speech ceases to apply when the people expressing the disagreeable sentiments are Muslims.

Continue reading

Lies and Andrew Gilligan: Who accused the East London Mosque of harbouring a child molestor?

Last month, in response to complaints about its coverage of the case of a former Hizb ut-Tahrir member convicted of sexually abusing young girls to whom he was giving religious instruction, theTelegraph published the following retraction on its website:

Our report “Extremist leader jailed for child abuse” (Jan 20) wrongly said that some of the victims of Ashraf Miah, described in a court report as a former teacher at the East London Mosque, were introduced via the Mosque. We are happy to confirm that the Mosque has no record of him ever having taught there and that there was no suggestion at trial of his victims having been introduced to him there.

The Telegraph‘s retraction referred to a report posted by Andrew Gilligan on his Telegraph blog (reproduced below), which stated:

The court heard that Miah also taught at the hardline East London Mosque, controlled by the Islamic Forum of Europe, which also believes in turning the UK into a sharia state, though by different methods. The mosque has hosted many hate, extremist and terrorist preachers, including Anwar al-Awlaki, the al-Qaeda spiritual leader. Some of the victims were introduced to Miah via the mosque.

This was the link to the offending report: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewgilligan/100072691/extremist-leader-jailed-for-child-abuse/

As you can see, the article has been deleted (either by Gilligan himself or by the administrators of the Telegraph website) and the link is now dead. But the report can still be found online, for example here.

You might think that Gilligan owed the East London Mosque an apology – after all, the accusation that the mosque harboured a child molestor who used its premises to target his victims was an extremely damaging one. But that would involve Gilligan admitting he got it wrong, and that would never do. So instead Gilligan has simply denied that he had any responsibility for publishing this false accusation. In a recent post on his Telegraph blog he wrote:

It is untrue to claim, as the mosque and its echoes in the blogosphere often do, including in its latest statement, that the Daily Telegraph has corrected any story I wrote about it: the correction was to a news-in-brief item (six months ago!) written by someone else. And if that 50-word piece, in all the tens of thousands of words we’ve written about the East London Mosque, is the only fault they’ve been able to find, I think we’re doing pretty well.

And in an earlier post on the East London Mosque, Gilligan had a go at yours truly over the same issue. After attacking my piece defending the mosque against charges of inciting homophobic violence, he added:

Bob’s passion for truth was also evident the other week, when he attacked me for an incorrect news-in-brief item about the mosque in the Telegraph which I did not write.

Now, it is true that the Telegraph did publish a news-in-brief piece on Ashraf Miah’s conviction in its print edition of 19 January (it is reproduced below). And the Telegraph also published a retraction of the inaccurate claims in that article:

Our report “Muslim extremist jailed for abusing girls at mosque” (Jan 19) wrongly said that Ashraf Miah, described in a court report as a former teacher at the East London Mosque, committed his offences on its premises. We are happy to confirm that he did not and that the Mosque has no record of him ever having taught there.

However, nobody has attributed this news-in-brief report to Gilligan. My own post reproduced the Telegraph‘s online statement regarding the false accusations against the East London Mosque in Gilligan’s blog article, from which I quoted. I didn’t refer at all to the short report in the print edition, still less claim that Gilligan had written it. In its response to the Telegraph‘s retractions the East London Mosque, too, clearly distinguished between the article on Gilligan’s blog and the news-in-brief report in the print edition, and made no claim that Gilligan was the author of the latter.

So what is Gilligan on about? The reality is that he did post a report on his Telegraph blog making false accusations against the East London Mosque. Having subsequently accepted that the accusations in that article were without basis, the Telegraph published a retraction and removed the article from its website. Now, in an attempt to deflect attention from this, Gilligan indignantly denies that he was the author of a different report in the Telegraph‘s print edition which nobody has in fact claimed he wrote.

Gilligan is very ready to accuse his critics of being liars, and you might be inclined to level the same charge against Gilligan himself. But that is possibly unfair. Liars are generally capable of recognising objective facts but choose to cover them up. Gilligan is perhaps better understood as a man living in a private fantasy world who is psychologically incapable of distinguishing between what’s true and what isn’t.


Muslim extremist jailed for abusing girls at mosque

Daily Telegraph print edition, 19 January 2011

A man has been jailed for a series of sex attacks on children while he was leader of a Muslim extremist group and a teacher at a hardline London mosque. Ashraf Miah, 38, from Mile End, repeatedly molested girls while they recited religious texts at the East London Mosque, Snaresbrook Crown Court heard. His victims were aged between five and seven. Miah, a senior member of the extremist group Hizb ut Tahrir, was jailed for three years and three months.


Extremist leader jailed for child abuse

Andrew Gilligan’s Telegraph blog, 20 January 2011

A man has been jailed for a series of sex attacks on committed while he was leader of a Muslim extremist group and a teacher at a hardline London mosque.

Ashraf Miah, 38, from Mile End, a former teacher at the East London Mosque, repeatedly molested the girls whilst they recited religious texts. The youngest victim was five and the oldest only seven.

Miah was at the time the East End leader of the notorious extremist group Hizb ut Tahrir, which believes that voting and democracy is forbidden in Islam and wants to turn Britain into a sharia state. He is listed as its contact for a number of events.

“He was a bit of a loner in the Hizb and did not have many friends, but he was a senior figure,” said one former member of the group.

During his trial, Miah claimed that the prosecution was a “conspiracy” against him because of his political views. Senior members of Hizb ut Tahrir gave evidence in Miah’s defence. However, the jury rejected his claims.

The assaults took place over a four-year period, from 2003 to 2007, during lessons at Miah’s flat and other houses in east London. Some of the girls complained to their parents about the abuse, but were not believed.

Snaresbrook Crown Court heard that the offences came to light after one of the girls’ fathers had a change of heart and reported her case to police. More victims were traced and Miah was convicted of a total of 13 sexual assaults against five different youngsters.

Sentencing him to three years and three months, Judge William Kennedy told Miah: “The children in this case came from three entirely separate and different families.

“Your suggestion at trial, and apparently still now, was and is that somehow the parents of those children have conspired to destroy your reputation. The suggestion that any parent would willingly encourage his or her daughter to lie about events in these circumstances was one which the jury considered and rejected.

“The possibility of coincidence of similar complaints by unconnected children is simply impossible.”

The court heard that Miah also taught at the hardline East London Mosque, controlled by the Islamic Forum of Europe, which also believes in turning the UK into a sharia state, though by different methods. The mosque has hosted many hate, extremist and terrorist preachers, including Anwar al-Awlaki, the al-Qaeda spiritual leader. Some of the victims were introduced to Miah via the mosque. The mosque said last night that it had “no record” of his working there.

The judge told Miah: “You were entrusted with these children as a religious teacher. As such you occupied a position of great importance and reputation. You repeatedly abused that trust.

“Right thinking people find it impossible to understand what gratification could possibly be achieved by the almost surreptitious touching of very small children. That the touching was sexual is beyond doubt.

“The offending was persistent, extending over a period of four years, and always involving children unlikely to be able to complain believably about what you were doing to them.

“Whatever may be the answer as to why you committed offences of this sort, the fact is that all decent people reserve a particular condemnation for those who abuse positions of trust to interfere with children.”

A Hizb ut Tahrir spokesman said last night that Miah had not been part of the group for two years and it was “satisfied that he did not use Hizb ut Tahrir for any criminal purpose.” The spokesman said that Hizb ut Tahrir members who testified for Miah “did so in a personal capacity.”

‘Muslim intimidation’ has struck fear in the ‘British Christian majority’, claims Benny Morris

Benny MorrisIsraeli historian Benny Morris has written an account of last week’s visit to the London School of Economics where he addressed a meeting on the subject of the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

The visit understandably provoked some controversy, given Morris’s support for ethnic cleansing and his bigoted comments about Muslims, and he complains that he was harangued by demonstrators on his way to the lecture theatre. (“Several spoke in broken, obviously newly acquired, English.”)

And what conclusion does Morris draw from this experience of political opponents exercising their legitimate right to protest against him? He writes: “Uncurbed, Muslim intimidation in the public domain of people they see as disagreeing with them is palpable and palpably affecting the British Christian majority among whom they live, indeed, cowing them into silence. One senses real fear….”

Of course, such comments are hardly unexpected, coming from a man who is on record as stating that “the phenomenon of the mass Muslim penetration into the West and their settlement there is creating a dangerous internal threat”.

However, imagine the outrage that would result if a Palestinian speaker at the LSE had been harangued by Zionist students and responded by writing: “Uncurbed, Jewish intimidation in the public domain of people they see as disagreeing with them is palpable and palpably affecting the British Christian majority among whom they live, indeed, cowing them into silence. One senses real fear….”

One thing is certain, that individual would never again be invited to speak at the LSE.

Wilders trial verdict due tomorrow

Wilders in court (3)The trial of Geert Wilders is nearly over. On Thursday, the three Amsterdam district court judges conducting the trial will announce their verdict. It is widely expected that Mr Wilders will be acquitted on all the charges facing him.

If that is the case, the 29-month legal struggle which saw one of the country’s most popular and influential politicians accused of hate-mongering will come to an end.

It started back in January 2009 when justices of the Amsterdam court ordered the public prosecutor to bring charges against Mr Wilders of inciting hatred and discrimination, based on a number of his anti-Islamic statements published in the national media, as well as Mr Wilders’ film, Fitna.

One moment during the dozens of courtroom sessions encapsulated what, for many, the trial was supposed to be about. Twenty-four-year-old law student Naoual Abaida, daughter of a Moroccan immigrant, stood in the courtroom not two metres from Geert Wilders. She was allowed to speak as one of the “injured parties”; one of the people who had initially petitioned the Justice Ministry to prosecute Geert Wilders.

Looking into his eyes she said his “insulting, polarising and provocative language has set the tone for a country becoming increasingly intolerant”.

Continue reading

Pat Condell claims all rapists in Oslo are ‘Muslim immigrants’

Oslo rapes TV report
Misleading Norwegian TV report on the findings of police study of rapes in Oslo

Last week the National Secular Society’s favourite “comedian” Pat Condell posted his latest video on YouTube. Entitled “Islamic cultural terrorism”, it was enthusiastically received by Condell’s fellow anti-Muslim racists in the English Defence League.

EDL Pat Condell

Continue reading

Peter Tatchell not only encourages Islamophobia – he defends the right of homophobes to incite hatred against the LGBT community


Banner at an English Defence League ‘support Israel’ demonstration in October 2010

What a popular man Peter Tatchell is. His article on the Mohammed Hasnath case, titled “Gay Free Zone conviction is disturbing”, which originally appeared on the New Statesman blog, has been crossposted at both Pink News and Harry’s Place, not to mention on a website rejoicing in the name of 9-11 Do more than Never Forget – Stop ISLAM. It has also been reproduced by the English Defence League’s Casuals United faction, who have provided their own approving headline, “Peter Tatchell piles into the Islamists”.

Continue reading

Don’t worry, Islamophobia isn’t a problem – we have Andrew Gilligan’s word for it

EDL Close East London Mosque NowAndrew Gilligan has a piece on his Telegraph blog, titled “Islamophobic crime fell in London last year – MCB spins the opposite”, in which he responds to the Independent on Sunday report on rising anti-Muslim hatred in the UK.

Gilligan accuses the Muslim Council of Britain’s secretary-general Farooq Murad of falsely claiming that hate crime against Muslims has risen in London. Now, I realise that Gilligan is the Telegraph‘s London editor and has a bit of an obsession with events in the capital, but if he had bothered to read the Independent report properly he would see that Farooq Murad was referring to the situation nationally, and made no reference to London.

Gilligan goes on to assert that “anti-Muslim hatred in Britain … is, thankfully, diminishing”, although he offers no real evidence for this. True, as the Independent article points out, police data on Islamophobic offences are not collated centrally and many forces do not compile such statistics at all, so hard evidence regarding hate crime nationally is lacking. However, you might have thought that the secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain would be in a better position than Gilligan to make an informed judgement on whether anti-Muslim hatred is on the increase across the UK.

And then there is the question of whether the figures for London are themselves reliable, given that a spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police accepts that hate crime against Muslims has been significantly under-reported. Indeed, taking the Met’s figures at face value, Gilligan would be forced to conclude that between 2008 and 2009 there was a massive rise in anti-Muslim hatred in London, with Islamophobic offences increasing from 106 to 368 and incidents of religiously motivated violence against Muslims from 96 to 303.

Of course, you can understand why Gilligan might have an interest in denying that there is a problem with rising Islamophobia in the UK, and in accusing the Independent of having fallen for “the Islamists’ grievance-mongering agenda” – because his disgraceful witch-hunting of the East London Mosque has fed the very anti-Muslim hatred whose existence he denies.

Update:  See also “Andrew Gilligan on anti-Muslim hate crimes”,ENGAGE, 14 June 2011

‘Spooks unmask burka death squads’ – Daily Star announces a ‘world exclusive’

Brit spooks have stopped SIXTY terror plots involving Black Widow bombers. Many of the Muslim women who were pulled in were carrying explosives, we can reveal. Other radicals as young as 17 had bomb materials stashed in their homes across the country.

The operation started when a dozen women in the London and Greater Manchester areas were picked up in security sweeps but allowed to go free. They were put under surveillance and led the spooks to more than 30 terror group leaders. But it is feared there are at least 20 of the Black Widow bombers still at large and ready to carry out their deadly missions.

A senior security source said: “The terrorists rely on a woman in a black flowing dress not being stopped. They can’t be searched easily because of their strict rules and it’s hard to see what they are hiding under their robes. A lot of people would think twice about searching them for fear of offending religious rules or being accused of sexual harassment or indecency.”

A senior security source has revealed that in the past year between 50 and 60 attacks have been averted after spies infiltrated Muslim terror cells.

Female suicide bombers have been used by the Taliban and rebels in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and by groups including the Tamil Tigers and Hamas to target civilians and soldiers.

Last year, two women bombed two Moscow subway stations killing at least 38 people and injuring over 60. Chechen “shahidkas” or Black Widows attacked Russian troops in Chechnya and were among a group that took 850 hostages in the Moscow theatre siege in 2002. The stand-off lasted two-and-a-half days. Russian forces killed 38 attackers and at least 129 hostages.

Daily Star on Sunday, 12 June 2011


Yet another anti-Muslim scare story from the Star. Of course, they provide no evidence at all that the security services have uncovered “sixty terror plots involving Black Widow bombers”. And if you read to the end of the report, the only quotes the Star‘s intrepid reporter can get from the police give no support to the story at all.

You do wonder what point there is in Richard Desmond formally distancing the Star from the English Defence League when this sort of irresponsible journalism feeds the culture of ignorant bigotry in which the racist far right can thrive and grow.

Casuals United Daily Star burka death squads story