Islamists = Nazis (according to Searchlight)

In the latest issue of Searchlight, Nick Lowles and Steve Silver offer us another example of the increasingly prevalent Islamism = fascism line.

Some of their analysis is unexceptional. When they write that “Omar Bakri Mohammed and his ilk are recruiting sergeants for the BNP”, who could disagree? Indeed, three years ago Inayat Buglawala of the MCB made exactly the same point about Bakri and Abu Hamza:

“Every time these two figures open their mouths it seems they are determined to help the cause of the racist British National Party in their goal of portraying Muslims as being disloyal and potential ‘fifth-columnists’. I doubt whether the BNP have two better recruiting sergeants than Omar Bakri and Abu Hamza.”

But Lowles and Silver go further than this. Take the following excerpt:

“The BNP and Islamist groups also have a symbiotic relationship, their activities fuelling each other. Racism from organisations such as the BNP, high votes for fascists and racist attacks all create a climate in which some young Asians in particular feel that they are victims of, and in conflict with, wider society. In turn, Islamist groups preach that Muslims not only face racism in Britain, but are oppressed across the world, particularly in Palestine and Iraq.”

Er … but isn’t it the case that Muslims are oppressed in Palestine and Iraq? Not necessarily so, according to Lowles and Silver. They refer blandly to “the Iraq war and other perceived [sic] injustices across the world”.

Worse still, according to their formulation, opposition to Zionist oppression of the Palestinians and to the imperialist conquest of Iraq is equated with the BNP’s racist hatred of minority ethnic groups.

And, as with Islamophobic right-wingers like Anthony Browne, the term “Islamism” is used without distinguishing between its reformist and violent extremist tendencies. The existence of bodies which are Islamist, in the sense of organising Muslims to engage in social and political activism, but which pursue their objectives through peaceful methods, is obliterated

Thus all forms of Islamism are reduced to a variant of fascism.

As Inayat Bunglawala wrote in criticism of Anthony Browne’s Times article that attacked MAB and Qaradawi as fascists: “it simply will not do to glibly compare ‘Islamists’ with Nazis. This type of incendiary rhetoric only adds to the prejudice which British Muslims have to face daily.”

All religious texts face both ways

“The bombings (or attempts) of 7 and 21 July seem to have thrown commentators and politicians back yet again to endless ponderings on what it means to be British. Into this steaming pot are thrown various statements about religion, culture, nationhood and patriotism. And since these particular terrorists happen to be Muslims, at first glance it would seem completely appropriate to examine the Koran for any possible link to what happened.

“But there are problems with this. We can quite reasonably ask the question of why Islam should be probed for its links to terrorism, when Christianity isn’t probed for its links to IRA bombings and Judaism isn’t probed for its links to the Zionist terror of 1946-48 in Palestine? It rather looks as if something selective is going on here.”

Michael Rosen in Socialist Worker, 20 August 2005

Iqbal Sacranie and Inayat Bunglawala, ‘Jew-haters’ – Rod Liddle

Inayat_Bunglawala“Sometimes things are altogether more simple than we wish them to be. Sir Iqbal Sacranie, the eminent chairman of the Muslim Council of Britain, recently refused to attend the Holocaust memorial day. When asked why this was so, he muttered something about how lots of people had been killed all over the place, not least the poor Palestinians and why shouldn’t we remember them, etc., etc. In the liberal press, extravagant excuses were made for Sacranie and his ludicrous chef de cabinet, Inayat Bunglawala. But I suspect that the simple answer, the one we didn’t want to hear, is the most accurate: Sacranie and Mr Bunglawala don’t like Jews. They are both unequivocal anti-Semites.”

Rod Liddle in the Spectator, 20 August 2005

So who wrote the following, then?

“The Nazi Holocaust was a truly evil and abhorrent crime and we stand together with our fellow British Jews in their sense of pain and anguish. None of us must ever forget how the Holocaust began. We must remember it began with a hatred that dehumanised an entire people, that fostered state brutality, made second class citizens of honest, innocent people because of their religion and ethnic identity. Those who were vilified and seen as a threat could be subjected to group punishment, dispossession and impoverishment while the rest of the world stood idly by, washing its hands of despair and suffering that kept getting worse.”

Yup, it was the “Jew-hating” MCB. See the MCB’s statement on this year’s Holocaust Memorial Day, 24 January 2005.

Tebbit attacks ‘unreformed’ Islam

Semi house trained polecatIslam is so unreformed there have been no real advances in art, literature, science or technology in the Muslim world in 500 years, Lord Tebbit says.

Multiculturalism is in danger of undermining British society, the former Conservative Party chairman also tells the e-politix website.

In the 1980s he questioned the loyalty of immigrants who backed cricket teams from their countries of origin. Now he says if he had been heeded it might have stopped the London bombings.

“To reduce the terrorism problem to simply blaming multiculturalism is blinkered and indeed dangerous,” a spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain said.

BBC News, 18 August 2005

See also ePolitix.com, 18 August 2005

‘Stone the gays, says Ken’s friend’

The Alliance for Workers’ Liberty takes up the now entirely discredited story (originating at Harry’s Place, and then publicised by GALHA and Outrage!) about Yusuf al-Qaradawi calling for the Crown Prince of Qatar to be stoned to death.

AWL website, 16 August 2005

For the background to this slander, see here, here and here

Plus the AWL informs us that Dr al-Qaradawi is “even worse” than Ariel Sharon! See here.

Muslim students refute unsubstantiated extremism on campuses

FOSIS logoThe Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS) Saturday strongly refuted allegations of excessive ‘Islamic extremism’ on university campuses. “What we are seeing is an attack on some of the most active and respected Islamic societies across the country,” said Faisal Hanjra, head of FOSIS Student Affairs.

Articles in the British press on Friday quoted a report to be published next week claiming that extremist organizations are operating on more than 30 university campuses across Britain. The leaking of the report came after Education Secretary Ruth Kelly urged vice-chancellors to clamp down on student extremists as part of the government’s new focus in its so-called war on terrorism following July’s bombing attacks in London.

But FOSIS, an umbrella organization representing over 90,000 Muslim students, said that the allegations of “Islamism” being rife on campuses were made without either defining it or outlining any methods of research to base such claims.

IRNA, 17 September 2005

See also MAB Online, 17 September 2005

Echoes of another time and a state that lost its tolerance

“There is a climate of thinly-disguised racialism in the popular press. Every picture of a Muslim cleric or detainee depicts a sneering, leering bearded fanatic – a kind of comic-book villain straight out of John Buchan. There is a striking resemblance between these contemporary depictions of Muslims and the images of Jews circulated by anti-semitic journals in Weimar Germany.”

Iain MacWhirter in the Herald, 17 August 2005

This critique would carry more weight if MacWhirter himself avoided writing scaremongering articles about the threat of “Islamofascism”. (Read Sohaib Saeed’s response here.)

BNP launch anti-mosque campaign

Community leaders and residents have spoken out against a BNP campaign to stop plans for a £1.5 million purpose-built mosque in Stoke-on-Trent.

The British National Party yesterday began distributing 20,000 leaflets which claim the mosque, to be built in Regent Road, Hanley, will be an eyesore, with prayers heard throughout the city via loudspeakers. It also claims the 600-capacity mosque will end up being built with council taxpayers’ cash and cause traffic chaos in the city centre.

Rana Tufail, director of the Islamic Centre, in Shelton, said the far-right party was scaremongering. He believes the mosque will be a credit to the city when it is completed.

Members of the public also say they have no problem with the mosque being built and criticised the BNP’s tactics.

Continue reading

Defend multiculturalism – Keith Vaz

In an interview in the current edition of the Parliamentary Monitor magazine, Keith Vaz expresses fears that “communities and not individuals” are being blamed for the attacks of July 7 and 21. Revealing that he has received scores of racially motivated “hate mail”, Vaz says that the drive for multiculturalism should continue despite growing fears about Muslim extremism.

“There is no better place to celebrate multiculturalism than Britain in 2005,” says the Labour MP.”Multiculturalism is different cultures and different religions within one society. And I would defend it right to the end. It has been a great benefit to our country – to our great cities. It has given Britain the face it has.”

ePolitix.com, 17 August 2005

Asian men targeted in stop and search

The use of counter-terrorism stop and search powers has increased sevenfold since the July 7 attacks on Britain, with Asian people bearing the brunt of the increase. People of Asian appearance were five times more likely to be stopped and searched than white people, according to the latest figures compiled by British Transport police. None of the stops have resulted in a terrorism charge, the force said.

Azad Ali, chairman of the Muslim Safety Forum, said: “This does not look like intelligence-led stop and search. This is disproportionate on an unacceptable scale.” He said police should record whether those stopped were Muslim or not.

Guardian, 17 August 2005