‘Muslim’ carnival entry creates controversy

St Columb paradeA dispute over an “insulting” carnival procession entry has developed into a row over political correctness.

Locals dressed as Muslims took part in the carnival in the Cornish market town of St Columb Major in protest over plans for a mosque. A group of students visiting the area thought the act was offensive to Muslims, and called in police.

The group, calling themselves the Page Three Beauties from the Ramalamadingdong Times, carried placards with names including “Miss Poppadomistan” and “Miss Reallyamanistan”. A home-made banner read “Join the Kernow Mosk drekly and become a Musli” over a picture of a Cornish pasty. Kernow is the Celtic name for Cornwall, while drekly is Cornish slang for “get it done quickly”. The group knelt down in mock prayer, using fake compasses to “find” the correct direction to locate Mecca.

The stunt was apparently intended as a harmless send-up of the Prince of Wales’s plan for a mosque in his nearby “Surfbury” model settlement. The plan has been criticised because there are only 33 practising Muslims in a population of 22,000.

The students complained to the police and the carnival organisers. Nina Brenton, one of the event’s organisers, said: “We were approached by about six students from out of the area and they thought it was disgusting and offensive to Muslims.

“They had a real go at us and asked how we could allow it in our carnival. We told them it was not up to us to dictate what is offensive unless a group is clearly causing offence. We did advise the group what had happened and gave them the choice of whether to carry on, and they did.”

She said the act was “all in good fun” and involved “just a group of local lads, mostly in their thirties”. She added: “The crowd seemed to love them. It just offended this small minority.”

Telegraph, 23 August 2007


See also the article “How Miss Slackistan and the Burka Beauties fell foul of the racism zealots” in the Daily Mail, 23 August 2007

Over at the Stormfront fascist discussion list the far right enthusiastically joins in the “fun”, while the British National Party asserts that the evidently rather half-hearted intevention by the police is “just the latest example of appeasement to Islamic sensibilities in OUR country”.

Another unfair, unbalanced discussion about Muslims

“FOX News once again used a discussion that purported to be about problems of religious intolerance as a platform to foment exactly that. On last night’s (8/22/07) Hannity & Colmes, a debate about a smear campaign against CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) turned into a smear campaign as FOX News producers gave Islamophobe Sean Hannity more camera time. Hannity, in turn, gave ‘his’ guest, the hatemongering David Horowitz more time to well, hate-monger. Alan Colmes and civil rights attorney Leo Terrell nevertheless did an excellent job with what they clearly knew was a stacked deck.”

News Hounds, 23 August 2007

‘What on earth are West Midlands Police up to?’

Dean GodsonThe question is posed by Dean Godson of the right-wing think tank Policy Exchange. He writes:

“How did the Crown Prosecution Service and West Midlands Police come to refer Channel 4’s Dispatches programme, Undercover Mosque, to Ofcom? It is one of the most bizarre decisions taken by public authorities in recent times. Having decided that they could not or would not prosecute the purveyors of Wahhabite hate speech portrayed in the film – mostly from the Green Lane mosque in Birmingham – they instead turned round on the documentary-makers and investigated them for allegedly stirring up racial hatred….

“In a packed seminar at Policy Exchange last week, speaker after speaker denounced West Midlands Police for shooting the messenger and for appeasing some of the most sectarian elements in their force area….

“Above all, the referral caters to the sense of ‘victim culture’ peddled by the Muslim Council of Britain and others: that our current discontents are caused as much by media sensationalism and ‘Islamophobia’ as by Islamist ideology itself. It will reinforce that strain of opinion within the MCB that holds that mosques and other institutions don’t need to clean up their act.”

Times, 23 August 2007

Two Muslim candidates is too many, Tories told Sayeeda Warsi

Sayeeda Warsi (2)David Cameron’s Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion was advised against standing in the next election because of fears that voters were not ready for two ethnic-minority candidates to stand against each other, she has disclosed.

Sayeeda Warsi, who was made a peer during Mr Cameron’s reshuffle after Gordon Brown became Prime Minister, had been considering whether to stand again in Dewsbury, Yorkshire, where she was defeated by 4,615 votes by another Muslim candidate, Shahid Malik, at the 2005 election. In an interview with the Yorkshire Post, Baroness Warsi has revealed how a discussion with local Conservative officials made her think twice about standing again.

She said that in a discussion with the local Conservative party chairman, he had said: “You’re the best candidate we have ever had. You would have made a fantastic MP for this town but at the moment, maybe because of the way that this community is, it still needs a bit of time on both sides.” He then added: “Maybe the white community is not ready for two ethnic candidates again and also the Muslim community needs to take a long, hard look at itself.”

Lady Warsi’s account of the conversation, which has not been challenged, will raise concerns among Conservatives who have been trying to widen the party’s appeal to the ethnic minorities.

Times, 22 August 2007

West underestimates the ‘evil of Islam’

Wafa SultanaThe West was still underestimating the evil of Islam, an influential Muslim thinker has warned.

On a two-week “under the radar” visit to Australia, Syrian-born Wafa Sultan secretly met both sides of federal politics and Jewish community leaders, warning them that all Muslims needed to be closely monitored in the West. She insisted that Australia and the US have been duped into believing there is a difference between the religion’s moderate and radical interpretations.

In an interview with The Australian, Dr Sultan – who shot to recognition last year following an interview on al-Jazeera television in which she attacked Islam and the prophet Mohammed – said Muslims were “brainwashed” from an early age to believe Western values were evil and that the world would one day come under the control of Sharia law.

The US-based psychiatrist – who has two fatwas (religious rulings) issued against her to be killed – warned that Muslims would continue to exploit freedom of speech in the West to spread their “hate” and attack their adopted countries, until the Western mind grasped the magnitude of the Islamic threat.

“You’re fighting someone who is willing to die,” Dr Sultan told The Australian in an Arabic and English interview. “So you have to understand this mentality and find ways to face it. (As a Muslim) your mission on this earth is to fight for Islam and to kill or to be killed. You’re here for only a short life and once you kill a kafir, or a non-believer, soon you’re going to be united with your God.”

Dr Sultan, who was brought to Australia by a group called Multi-Net comprised of Jews and Christians, met senior politicians, including Attorney-General Philip Ruddock, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Labor deputy leader Julia Gillard.

Private security was hired for Dr Sultan, who left Australia yesterday, and state police authorities were also made aware of her movements in the country. The organisers of her visit asked the media to not publish anything about her stay until she had left the country because of security-related concerns.

Dr Sultan said Islam was a “political ideology” that was wrongly perceived to have a moderate and hardline following. “That’s why the West has to monitor the majority of Muslims because you don’t know when they’re ready to be activated. Because they share the same basic belief, that’s the problem,” said the 50-year-old, who was last year featured in Time magazine’s list of the 100 most influential people in the world.

The Australian, 21 August 2007

The ‘double standards’ of the Crown Prosecution Service

Right-wing Islamophobe Adrian Morgan (of the notorious Western Resistance blog) joins the ranks of commentators expressing indignation at the behaviour of West Midlands Police and the Crown Prosecution Service over the Channel 4 documentary “Undercover Mosque” (on which, Morgan reminds us, “the respected journalist Martin Bright” acted as consultant).

Morgan charges the CPS with double standards, for prosecuting the leader of the “politically incorrect” (sic) BNP under the racial hatred law while refusing to take action against Muslim “preachers of hate”. This, Morgan opines, demonstrates that “law and order are not applied fairly to all”, i.e. that the state discriminates in favour of minority ethnic communities against the white majority. Which is, of course, the very same ludicrous racist fantasy that the BNP itself promotes.

Morgan writes: “The Crown Prosecution Service took the bizarre decision to prosecute Nick Griffin, the leader of the far-right British National Party, for statements he had made privately in 2004, but were filmed undercover by the BBC. Griffin had called Islam ‘a wicked and vicious faith’ that was turning Britain into ‘a multi-racial hell-hole’, and was prosecuted for inciting racial hatred. Twice. When he was acquitted by a jury for the second time on November 10, 2006, Gordon Brown suggested that race hate laws should be tightened – even though Islam is not, nor has it ever been, a race.

“The Crown Prosecution Service employs double standards. It engages in dogged attempts to prosecute the leader of a ‘politically incorrect’ party, while trying to have a documentary maker prosecuted for highlighting the genuine extremist statements made in some of Britain’s mosques. Yet it does not try to prosecute those preachers of hate – showing how law and order are not applied fairly to all. A free society should have a free press, a free media, and should allow its citizens to express their freedom of speech. Gordon Brown, who is now the unelected prime minister, would stifle all criticism of Islam under race hate laws, but Islamist preachers can apparently spew hatred of Britain, its people and its armed forces, with impunity.”

Family Security Matters, 21 August 2007

Although he reproduces it in his article, evidently Morgan hasn’t bothered to read the joint statement by West Midlands Police and CPS, which states quite clearly that it was the West Midlands Police who wanted to prosecute Channel 4 for inciting hatred and the CPS who rejected the proposal on technical grounds. But what can you expect from the idiot who once claimed that one of the individuals associated with Islamophobia Watch is the former secretary of the Workers Revolutionary Party!

Yet another right-wing Islamophobic defence of ‘Undercover Mosque’

Leo-McKinstry“Freedom of speech is one of the cornerstones of our democracy. The open exchange of views and the expression of controversial opinions are bulwarks against tyranny. Yet the British tradition of liberty is now increasingly under threat because of the state’s cowardly policy of trying to appease radical Islam.

“In the name of promoting a spirit of tolerance, our civic institutions have become ruthlessly intolerant of anyone who dares to challenge some of the most repellent features of hardline Islamism, such as misogyny, the contempt for human rights and the resort to violence for political ends. Blanket accusations of racism are regularly used to suppress debate about the problems caused by Islam.

“Britain fought the last war against an anti-semitic, book-burning, totalitarian regime. Yet in a bizarre twist, the modern British Government now acts as the guardian of those Muslims who want to see an Islamic version of just such a regime in this country. In a monstrous inversion of our values, those seeking to uphold our freedoms against Muslim fundamentalism are now the target of state repression.

“The British bobby, once a symbol of robust common sense, is rapidly being transformed into an agent of the race-fixated thought police. Perhaps the most worrying recent example of this trend was the outrageous conduct of the West Midlands police over a Channel 4 investigation into extremism within Birmingham’s mosques – Undercover Mosque.”

Leo McKinstry in the Daily Express, 20 August 2007

Leyton mosque welcomes decision over ‘Undercover Mosque’

Masjid al-Tawhid 2A documentary featuring a mosque in Leyton has been criticised by police for giving a distorted picture of Islamic teaching. Channel 4’s Undercover Mosque documentary, broadcast in January, featured Masjid al-Tawhid, in Leyton High Road, alongside other mosques and imams around Britain.

Speeches by Shaykh Suhaib Hassan, senior imam at Masjid-al-Tawhid, were among those used in the programme, which claimed to have uncovered extremist preachers encouraging violence against women, homosexuals and non-Muslims.

But West Midlands Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have criticised the documentary’s makers Hardcash Productions for editing speeches to make them appear more inflammatory.

Shaykh Hassan’s son, Dr Usama Hassan, who is vice-chairman and one of the imams at Masjid al-Tawhid, described the police’s assessment as entirely accurate. He said:

“We have given thousands of hours of positive, wholesome, sensible teaching, teaching people to be good citizens as well as good Muslims. It’s egg on their faces for Dispatches and Hardcash. It was a very poor documentary cobbled together in a great hurry, and hopefully they’ll learn from it and be more balanced and professional.

“We should be able to have honest dialogue and that includes criticism. People should be able to politely make their point. Journalists have to have a sense of responsibility. Things like this can be as dangerous as religious fanatics causing problems.”

Waltham Forest Guardian, 18 August 2007

Hizb ut-Tahrir – ‘so extreme that even the BBC criticises it’

Torygraph journalist Damian Thompson whips up hysteria over a video produced by Hizb ut-Tahrir Malaysia, which “represents the new face of Islamic propaganda – slick, plausible, terrifying”. Thompson describes HT as “an Islamic supremacist group that wants to establish a global Caliphate. That means a Caliphate in Britain” (which a moment’s thought would indicate to Thompson is a bit unlikely, given that Muslims make up around 3% of the population in the UK). Indeed, according to Thompson, HT “is so extreme that even the BBC criticises it”!

Daily Telegraph blog, 18 August 2007