‘NUTS!’ Allen West’s response to CAIR’s call to break links with anti-Muslim extremists

Congressman and possible senator Allen West lives in his own serene and strange reality where, no doubt, his recent response to a local Islamic group makes perfect sense.

In early August, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) sent a 679-word letter to West urging him to cut ties with “anti-Islamic extremists”. CAIR singled out Brigitte Gabriel, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, and Rev. Neil Dozier as Muslim-haters with whom West has shared stages.

“Muslims protect and serve our great country and are afforded equal protection under law,” the letter read. “We shouldn’t have to defend our rights to worship freely or participate in the governing of our society.”

Soon afterward, CAIR received the following letter, which was first reported by CBS4. The Muslim group sent us a copy, which we’ve embedded below. We believe it might be the dumbest thing ever written on congressional stationery.

Executive director Nezar Hamze tells Riptide he’s befuddled: “Obviously, I was expecting a little more from an elected official. I don’t know if he was calling me nuts or calling my request nuts or what.”

(West’s spokesperson has yet to explain to New Times what the congressman meant.)

Hamze doesn’t think he’ll write West back. “How can I respond to this?”

Miami New Times, 16 August 2011

Allen West NUTS

Norway: Progress Party official claimed the Qur’an makes Muslims mentally ill and potentially violent

Trond RedThe month of Ramadan came into full effect last week, and followers of Islam must be truly amazed by what Norway has been saying about them. In a week when the Progress Party has been put under scrutiny due to Carl I. Hagen’s “most terrorists are Muslims” comments, FrP are dealing with more criticism today.

It has been revealed that Trond Røed, respected leader of the Buskerud region, was forced to apologise after admitting to sending out an eleven-page document to almost 100 party members in 2004. Contained in it are suggestions that people who follow Islam must be “deprogrammed” using psychiatric help, as well as arguments for imposing a veto on further preaching of their faith.

VG alleges the document consists of several highly controversial statements about Islam and Muslims, including one that alleges repeating certain Qur’an verses could lead to indoctrination leading to tendencies that are more violent.

“One should therefore question whether hour-long Qur’an citations over many years can cause serious psychological damage, with a consequent risk of committing criminal and destructive acts. Another question is whether it is possible to establish suitable psychiatric treatment institutions that can carry out the deprogramming,” one paragraph read.

Mr Røed also believed this document could be a useful contribution towards the Progress Party’s immigration policy views, alleging Islam has strong connections with violence.

Muslim Anne Sofie Roald, a Norwegian-born professor and Islam researcher at the Christian Michelsen Institute, says his statements indicate “a lack of history”. “Even though Islam has more of a political background, Christianity has been used politically and is, amongst other things, used for such purposes in the U.S. today,” she says, “not to mention in a politically violent manner under the Crusades.”

Trond Røed has since apologised for his actions, telling VG “I don’t stand for what I said then any longer, regret sending it and that I didn’t conduct better research at the time”. He has refused to comment on the matter further.

The Foreigner, 17 August 2011

Ken Livingstone explains why he supports a ban on the EDL march in Tower Hamlets

We need calm on the streets of London, not this EDL march

By Ken Livingstone

The far-right English Defence League proposes to march in Tower Hamlets on September 3rd.

I want to set out here why I am supporting a ban on this march.

The EDL use religious hatred in a way that stirs up racial hatred. Their activities have often led to violence and physical intimidation.

There are many who have put forward civil liberties arguments for allowing the far right to demonstrate, however unpalatable their views may be. The context of this EDL march is now radically different following the riots and disturbances we have seen on our streets. We need to put good community relations and peace on the streets before division and extremism.

As Mayor my case to the Home Secretary would be this: the last thing we need in the uneasy aftermath of the riots is a march through one of London’s most diverse areas by far right provocateurs intent on stirring up division. We need calm and peace on our streets, not the threat of further street violence. It should be obvious that an EDL march in East London could be extremely dangerous.

We should be putting Londoners first, not the rights of the EDL to intimidate people.

It is right to be tough on those who have broken the law in the past few weeks. Equally, we cannot allow the extreme right to march with impunity into an area with the express intent of stirring up division. Not least because so many EDL actions have led to violent confrontation.

The EDL’s aim is to divide people, incite religious hatred as a means to create racial division, and turn people against each other.

In the past few weeks I have joined with politicians and community leaders from a range of backgrounds to call on the Home Secretary that this march to be banned. It is a welcome step to see such unity. Unity across party labels, faiths and backgrounds is essential opposing the dangerous threat of far-right violence.

In the aftermath of the massacre in Norway there was a clear case for halting the EDL demonstration in East London. Alleged links subsequently emerged between the EDL and Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian who murdered scores of people in Norway.

Now, in the context of the riots and disorder on our street, there is a compelling case that such a march should not be permitted to go ahead. For the sake of order and peace on our streets and preserving calm it would be irresponsible to let it happen.

The Home Secretary must act to ensure that the EDL is not able to bring its tour of hate to the streets of East London on September 3rd.

French businessman pays Belgian face veil fines

French businessman Rachid Nekkaz stands next to Halima and Imen after he paid their fines for wearing a niqab in BrusselsA French businessman paid fines Wednesday for two women in Belgium who wore full-face veils in public and said he would take Belgium and France to court over laws banning Muslim niqabs and burqas.

Property dealer Rachid Nekkaz has set up a 1 million euro ($1.4 million) fund to cover fines and paid the first 50-euro penalties imposed in Belgium on two women in Brussels.

“France and Belgium have decided to forbid the possibility and the liberty of women to wear what they want,” he told reporters outside a municipal office in Brussels. The two fined women, both wearing niqabs, were also present.

“I consider that … it’s not acceptable that European governments vote in laws that don’t respect individual rights.”

Belgium’s law banning any covering of the face in public came into effect late last month. France was the first country to introduce a ban in Europe in April.

Nekkaz said he planned a legal challenge in both countries. “I will pursue the French and Belgian states in their national courts and then in the European Court of Human Rights so that they are sanctioned for violating individual liberties.”

Reuters, 17 August 2011

Show Racism the Red Card defies budget cuts to fight Islamophobia

Islamophobia FilmA Tyneside charity is widening efforts to rid North East schools of racism, despite suffering budget cuts of more than £80,000.

Show Racism the Red Card chief executive Ged Grebby criticised the “growing influence” of the English Defence League in the region’s schools and claimed a “rise in Islamophobia” and the increased support for far right organisations threatened to exploit youngsters and spread through classrooms.

Last night he said that his charity – which was originally formed in Newcastle in 1996 with the aim of booting racism out of professional and grassroots football – had plans to grow its operations and tackle the issue.

But deep Government cuts and a reduction in local council spending has meant the charity has seen more than £80,000 disappear from its spending purse. Mr Grebby said the charity had been forced to draw on reserves in an effort to maintain its fight against racism.

He said: “The issues have become much more complex than 15 years ago, especially with the rise of Islamophobia and the EDL. The EDL have latched on to this and have exploited the issue and it is a huge issue.” He added: “Public sector cuts have had an impact on all charities and although we have made a loss this year, the success of previous years has meant we were able to use some of our reserve funds.”

Journal Live, 16 August 2011

See also “Anti-racism charity ups efforts to combat EDL”, TES, 12 August 2012

Michigan: opponents decry anti-Sharia bill as racist

Rashida Tlaib and Dawud WalidDetroit — Prominent Muslim leaders and others on Tuesday announced their opposition to a bill to ban “foreign laws” in Michigan, calling the measure a racist attack on Islam.

State Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Harvey Santana, D-Detroit, joined activists at a press conference outside Cadillac Place in Midtown to denounce a bill sponsored by Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, to outlaw state courts from implementing foreign laws, including Sharia, or Islamic law.

“I’m appalled as the first Muslim woman serving in the Michigan legislation,” Tlaib said. “This is taking a community and casting suspicion on them … targeting them, and it’s completely wrong. It’s racism at its core.”

Santana said the bill “polarizes people based on fear”. “Dave Agema has a history of making bigoted comments,” Santana said.

Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, attended the event Tuesday and said his group plans to file a lawsuit if the legislation is passed. A House committee has yet to take up the bill.

Darnell White, the interim director of the Detroit Branch NAACP said, “We have too many issues – jobs, (home) foreclosures – to be focused on this”. “This is wrong and we denounced this type of legislation,” White said at Tuesday’s news conference.

Detroit News, 16 August 2011

See also MLive.com, 16 August 2011

Complaint to Charity Commission over Barnabas Fund’s ‘Islamisation’ booklet

Barnabas Fund Slippery SlopeThe Charity Commission has received a complaint about a charity that is campaigning against the “Islamisation of the UK”.

The commission said concerns had been raised about the Barnabas Fund, which is selling a booklet it has produced called Slippery Slope: the Islamisation of the UK.

The Barnabas Fund offers financial support to projects around the world that help Christians suffering oppression and persecution “as a consequence of their faith”.

The booklet claims that DVDs featuring radical preachers are “widely disseminated” in mosques and says that on one such DVD a speaker argues that “if a girl refuses to wear the hijab, she should be hit”. It also claims that radical Muslim preachers say “women are created with deficient intellect”.

A commission spokeswoman said: “Concerns have been raised with us regarding the Barnabas Fund after recent media coverage of a booklet produced by the charity. We are currently considering the issues raised to determine what, if any, regulatory interest there is for the commission.”

Continue reading

ADL leader poses ‘danger to the fabric of US society’

Abe Foxman ADLOver at the American Thinker the one-time Jihad Watch collaborator Andrew Bostom (he and Robert Spencer have since fallen out) takes issue with Abe Foxman’s recent JTA op ed condemning the spread of Sharia hysteria in the US. According to Bostom:

“Abraham Foxman’s latest uninformed rant, ‘Shout down the Sharia myth makers’, re-affirms his nonpareil status as the most blindly agenda-driven organizational Jewish ‘leader’. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL)’s Foxman sprays defamatory charges – rooted in willful ignorance – against all those legitimately concerned with the ceaseless efforts of mainstream institutional American Islam to insinuate Sharia mores and jurisdiction into US society.”

Bostom’s conclusion? Foxman and his views “pose an unacceptable danger to the fabric of US society”.