Sun and Sunday Times agree to pay substantial libel damages to Yusuf Islam

The UK’s Sunday Times and Sun newspapers have agreed to pay Yusuf Islam (formerly known as the singer Cat Stevens) substantial damages in respect of articles published on 17th and 19th October 2004.

Both reports falsely alleged that Yusuf Islam was or had been involved in supporting terrorism and suggested that, as a result, the US authorities had been right to refuse Mr Islam entry into the United States in September 2004.

As well as agreeing to pay substantial damages in relation to these false and highly defamatory allegations, both newspapers also published prominent apologies in which they acknowledged that Mr Islam is not, and never has been, involved in or supported terrorism, and that he abhors all such activities. Indeed, in apologising to Mr Islam both newspapers also pointed out that Mr Islam was recently presented with the “Man for Peace” award by a group of Nobel peace Laureates.

The newspapers have undertaken not to repeat these false allegations and also agreed to pay Mr Islam’s legal costs.

Mr Islam said: “It seems to be the easiest thing in the world these days to make scurrilous accusations against Muslims, and in my case it directly impacts on my relief work and damages my reputation as an artist. The harm done is often difficult to repair. However, I am delighted by the settlement, which helps vindicate my character and good name.”

Yusuf Islam intends to contribute the damages from both newspapers to relief projects for orphans which he has started in tsunami-hit South East Asia. He visited Indonesia in January and is set to release a charity single entitled Indian Ocean later this month, the proceeds of which will go to the same children’s fund.

“I have been supporting orphans and needy families for many years now,” continued Mr Islam, “and I don’t intend to stop. I have never knowingly aided any terrorist group or any charitable organization that equips or supports terrorists. I will continue working for peace and supporting the poor and destitute around the world.”

Muslim News, 15 February 2005

Qaradawi not anti-semitic shock

The Middle East Media Research Institute, a right-wing organisation headed by a former colonel in Israeli intelligence, has become notorious for its distorted coverage of Middle East politics. Its speciality is to provide partial translations of articles and broadcasts from the Arab media in order to present Muslims in general, and opponents of the Israeli government in particular, in the worst possible light.

Yusuf al-Qaradawi has been a notable victim of MEMRI’s propaganda operation. In July 2004, at the time of Dr al-Qaradawi’s visit to London, MEMRI published a Special Report accusing him of acting as “a spiritual guide for many … Islamist organizations across the world, including supporters of Islamist terrorist organizations such as Al-Qa’ida”.

That same month, MEMRI approvingly quoted the article ‘Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi: Liberal or Extremist?’ by pro-US Arab journalist Abd Al-Rahman Al-Rashed, which falsely accused Qaradawi of rejecting all dialogue with Jews.

However, a recent dispatch by MEMRI struggled hard to maintain the fiction that Qaradawi is a hate-filled anti-semite. Even MEMRI’s selective extracts from Qaradawi’s Al-Jazeera programme could not obscure the truth about his firm rejection of anti-semitism.

Perhaps Peter Tatchell, who in the November 2004 issue of Labour Left Briefing summarised Dr al-Qaradawi’s philosophy as “destroy the Jews – all of them”, will now be writing to the Sheikh to apologise?

Tatchell’s Islamic conspiracy theory

“Peter Tatchell’s slander that I seem ‘willing to sacrifice gay rights if it is politically expedient to do so’ (Qaradawi not welcome, LLB, November 2004) shows the depths of the errors to which he has been dragged by his ‘Muslim-fundamentalist-plot-to-take-over-the-world’ conspiracy theory.”

Ken Livingstone writing in Labour Left Briefing, February 2005

Islamic culture: A convenient scapegoat

“Ever since the monumental day of 11 September 2001, the world has been inundated by stale clichés and dim-witted myths, poorly disguised as honest academic research and free objective journalism.

“In this great hyperbole, the world appears broken into two opposite trenches: a sphere of freedom, morality and civility, confronted by its antithesis: an enslaved barbaric realm that encapsulates all that “we” are not.

“The far-stretching lands of Islam loom largely in this bleak uncivilised sphere. If the modern West is dynamic, the world of Islam is stagnant. If it is governed democratically and honours self-ownership, Islam is plagued by a despotism that crushes the individual altogether out of existence. If it is rigorously rational, the world of Islam is the embodiment of raving instincts and wild emotionalism.”

Soumayya Ghannoushi on the Muslim Association of Britain website

Kenan Malik denies Islamophobia exists

“In reality, discrimination against Muslims is not as great as is often claimed.” So says Kenan Malik. See:

‘What hate?’, Kenan Malik in The Guardian
‘Are Muslims Hated?’ Transcript of Kenan Malik’s Channel 4 documentary
‘Islamophobia Myth’, Kenan Malik on Frontpagemag.com
Inayat Bunglawala of the Muslim Council of Britain responds to Malik’s views in The Guardian letters page
Waqar Khan comments in Asians in Media magazine
Dead Men Left blog takes on Malik

‘Britainistan: The Labour Party is nursing a viper’

“New antiterrorism measures proposed by Britain’s Labour government in late January – including curfews, electronic tagging, and house arrest for terror suspects – were a step in the right direction for a nation increasingly beset by radical Islamists…. Yet, despite the almost-daily reports of terrorist schemes and anti-Semitic attacks coming out of Scotland Yard, some leading Labour-party officials still don’t grasp the severity of the Islamist threat – in fact, they are advancing ideas and policies that would strengthen it…. Rather than condemn the rise of Islamism in Britain, they seek to appease and cajole the country’s restless and growing Muslim minority by bowing to its every demand, no matter how much it would infringe on the rights of the British majority.”

Erick Stakelbeck and Nir Boms in the National Review, 9 February 2005

MCB calls on MPs to vote for equal treatment under the law

The Muslim Council of Britain has written to party leaders and all members of parliament laying out its case for supporting the proposed legislation to prohibit incitement to religious hatred.

In a letter sent to all MPs, the Secretary-General of the MCB asked everyone to consider: “The question that is not being answered is why certain faith communities should be allowed to suffer unjustly and unfairly because they happen to be of a different faith. Surely, it is important for members of parliament to send a powerful message clearly stating that people of all faiths and none should be treated equally under the law? The proposal is not to create a new type of law but to extend existing laws in order to close the current loophole in legislation, thus ending the hierarchy of rights that we have at present.”

MCB press release, 7 February 2005