Muslim undesirables need not apply

Baden-Württemberg is described in the guidebooks as having more universities than any other German state as well as a “rich cultural and religious diversity.” I am afraid the cultural diversity bit won’t go down well these days – at least not among German liberals and Muslims, who are outraged over a questionnaire that the state proposes to put before those seeking German citizenship. In Germany the states have say in these matters.

Not every applicant has to fill out the questionnaire. If you are Portuguese applying for German citizenship, chances are you wouldn’t have to bother with it. But since January, if the authorities have some reason to think that you might not make a good citizen, then you might find yourself being grilled. For the instructions say that if the naturalization authority doubts that the applicant has really understood the content of his or her declaration, or doubts that the answers reflect “inner convictions,” then the authorities will “conduct a conversation with the applicant.”

Defenders say Baden-Württemberg is being careful to screen out undesirables, and that only people the authorities have reason to be suspicious of would be questioned. But critics are sure the questionnaire is specifically aimed at Muslims. “This questionnaire is a very dangerous thing and has to be stopped,” one of the best-known politicians of Turkish origin in Germany, Cem Ozdemir, told me. Ozdemir, a member of the European Parliament, says the danger comes from the discretionary powers it gives junior officials. Baden-Württemberg’s government would never say it wanted to make it harder for Muslims to become citizens. But the tone of the questionnaire would lead underlings to assume that was the intention, according to Ozdemir.

“When you read these questions you see the mind of the bureaucracy and German society, not what Muslims may think,” said Barbara John, who was for 20 years involved with migration and integration affairs here in the state of Berlin.

Christian Hoffmann, a convert to Islam who is chairman of the Muslim Academy in Germany, says: “The spirit of these questions is so Islamophobic and ethnically biased. It is an assault against underprivileged people.” Educated people would smell out the trap, he said.

One question asks applicants to comment on the following statements: “Humanity has never experienced such a dark phase as under democracy. In order to free himself from democracy, man has to understand first that democracy cannot offer anything good to him.” Monarchists might agree, but that’s not the group the questions were designed to catch.

Continue reading

‘The pope’s unexploded bombshell’

Diana West takes up Pope Benedict’s reported statement that Islam is unreformable: “… the question shouldn’t be: ‘Why Can’t Islam Be More Like the West?’ It should be: ‘How can the West prevent itself from becoming more like Islam?’ One obvious answer is an immigration policy aimed at preventing the kind of Islamic demographic shifts we already see transforming Europe.”

TownHall.com, 23 January 2006

Muslim memorial to the Holocaust

Inayat_BunglawalaIn a letter in today’s Independent, Inayat Bunglawala of the Muslim Council of Britain replies to Yasmin Alibhai-Brown’s article in yesterday’s paper:

“Yasmin Alibhai-Brown casually misrepresents the position of the Muslim Council of Britain, accusing us of declining to ‘mourn victims of one of the deadliest mass exterminations in human history’ (23 January). The MCB fully accepts and recognises the monstrous horror and cruelty that underpinned the Nazi holocaust.

“The reason the MCB has called for a more inclusive ‘Genocide Memorial Day’ is because across the globe – not just among Muslims – there is a widespread view that we in the west practise double standards and devalue the lives of non-westerners. In the MCB’s view, the subtext of the Holocaust Memorial Day would thus be better served and help make the cry ‘Never Again’ real for all people who suffer, even now.

“In the last decade we have seen genocide take place in both Rwanda (one million killed in 1994 in the space of a few weeks) and Chechnya (10 per cent of its population has been killed since the Russians launched their invasion of the tiny republic.) We need to do more than just reflect on the past. We must be able to recognise when similar abuses occur in our own time.”

Nazis denounce Islam Expo

BNP Islam Out of Britain“The Mayor of London looks set to win the supreme accolade of being Britain’s ‘number one’ Islamophile after announcing his plans to host an exhibition of ‘modern Islam’ in the capital on the anniversary of the July 7th bombings which killed 52 innocent passengers and the four suicide bombers themselves….

“Islam is an aggressive proselytizing religion and this exhibition has to be seen in that light. It is another attempt to win over followers to the religion of submission and Livingstone and his fellow travellers in the Labour Party must be viewed as quislings, responsible for aiding and abetting followers of this mediaeval, desert religion who seek to turn Britain from being Dar-al-Kufr to Dar-al-Islam.”

BNP news article, 23 January 2006

Strange, I thought Nazis were in favour of quislings.

Exhibition will combat myths about Islam

Europe’s biggest exhibition of modern-day Islam will take place in London a year after the 7 July bombings in an effort to depict the religion in a positive light.

The Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, is set to launch the event which hopes to “combat the myths, misconceptions and misunderstandings of Islam”. IslamExpo will consist of a series of exhibitions on Islam’s cultural heritage, lectures, debates, films, stand-up comedy and workshops at Alexandra Palace. Organisers plan to invite survivors of the Tube attacks to attend with a special commemoration on the day.

It is hoped that the event will help to improve relations between Britain’s 1.8 million Muslims and the wider community.

Independent, 23 January 2006

For details of Islam Expo, see here.

For the thoughtful comments of Jihad Watch supporters, see here.

More misrepresentation of Manji

Another puff piece for Irshad Manji, who is apparently a leader of “reform-minded Muslims”.

Sunday Times, 22 January 2006

This despite the fact that Manji is almost universally loathed by Muslims, including the most “reform-minded” of her co-religionists. On the other hand, Manji is greatly admired by the likes of Melanie Phillips and Daniel Pipes.

And while the Murdoch press is happy to promote Manji, it has no hesitation in also publishing articles entitled “How my neighbourhood was lost to the multiculture“.

Christian-Muslim Forum and Islam Expo seek to build bridges

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, is to host the inaugural meeting and formal launch tomorrow of a new Christian-Muslim Forum in the UK. The event coincides with the unveiling in London today of what is claimed to be Europe’s largest-ever exhibition to “combat the myths, misconceptions and misunderstandings of Islam” – headed up by the Muslim envoy who has been seeking the release of four Christian Peacemaker Teams activists in Iraq.

Ekklesia news report, 23 January 2006

Muriel Gray on the dangers of Islamic education

“To conduct oneself properly as an adherent Muslim, one must obey the Koran and guidance of the prophet Muhammed. With regard to artistic endeavours, he was unambiguous about Allah’s will. It is haram (forbidden) for a Muslim to make a drawn or modelled representation of any animate living thing, as Allah’s creations must not be imitated by the hand of man. Trees, flowers and landscape are fine, say the scholars, but humans, birds and animals are out. It is also haram to make or listen to music for pleasure, or to dance for pleasure or artistic expression. It is haram to view filmed or theatrical images of entertainment or read ‘un-Islamic’ literature.”

Muriel Gray explains why a state-funded Catholic primary school in Glasgow, 90% of whose pupils are from Muslim families, should not be allowed to become a state-funded Muslim school.

Sunday Herald, 22 January 2006

Update:  For Osama Saeed’s response, See Rolled Up Trousers, 23 January 2006

Dutch immigration restrictions draw fire

Dutch Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk’s recent anti-immigrant measures, including a rule to speak Dutch in public, drew fire from Muslim minority leaders as well as from her own party.

“Linking integration to speaking Dutch in the street is nothing but an attempt to turn a blind eye to certain realities on the ground,” Dris Boujoufi, the deputy chairman of the council of Muslim representatives in the Netherlands, told IslamOnline.net Sunday, January 22. “Immigrants of the second and third generations who were born, raised and taught in the Netherlands are yet unable to integrate though they speak Dutch.”

Verdonk told a meeting of her liberal VVD party on Saturday, January 21, that immigrants must comply with a national code of conduct by speaking Dutch in the street.

Her proposal drew immediate fire from some members of her own party. “I can’t see what would hurt the minister or others if I spoke Surinamese with a friend in the street?” asked Laetitia Griffith, a member of Amsterdam’s College of Aldermen which creates and maintains the city’s systems and policies jointly with the city council and mayor.

Islam Online, 22 January 2006