Wilders won’t talk with Muslim Council

THE HAGUE – Freedom Party PVV leader Geert Wilders refuses to enter dialogue with the Dutch Muslim Council, the Volkskrant reports. The council has invited him to talk about the ban on the Koran that the politician suggested in an article two weeks ago. Chairman of the Muslim Council Khairoun says that Wilders was taking passages from the Koran out of context.

The PVV leader said in the AD on Saturday that he was not interested in a talk with the organisation. “I will refrain from doing that not because I don’t want dialogue, but because a debate on this is not possible. It is pointless,” says Wilders. The Muslim Council has proposed a “constructive dialogue” to combat polarisation and feelings of fear in society.

Wilders contests in the AD that he is sowing hate. “That is what the Koran does. It is a fascist book. That is not a book we should have here. Maybe if you take all the harmful verses out of it, but then there wouldn’t be much left. Then the Koran would be about as thick as a comic book.”

Expatica, 20 August 2007

West underestimates the ‘evil of Islam’

Wafa SultanaThe West was still underestimating the evil of Islam, an influential Muslim thinker has warned.

On a two-week “under the radar” visit to Australia, Syrian-born Wafa Sultan secretly met both sides of federal politics and Jewish community leaders, warning them that all Muslims needed to be closely monitored in the West. She insisted that Australia and the US have been duped into believing there is a difference between the religion’s moderate and radical interpretations.

In an interview with The Australian, Dr Sultan – who shot to recognition last year following an interview on al-Jazeera television in which she attacked Islam and the prophet Mohammed – said Muslims were “brainwashed” from an early age to believe Western values were evil and that the world would one day come under the control of Sharia law.

The US-based psychiatrist – who has two fatwas (religious rulings) issued against her to be killed – warned that Muslims would continue to exploit freedom of speech in the West to spread their “hate” and attack their adopted countries, until the Western mind grasped the magnitude of the Islamic threat.

“You’re fighting someone who is willing to die,” Dr Sultan told The Australian in an Arabic and English interview. “So you have to understand this mentality and find ways to face it. (As a Muslim) your mission on this earth is to fight for Islam and to kill or to be killed. You’re here for only a short life and once you kill a kafir, or a non-believer, soon you’re going to be united with your God.”

Dr Sultan, who was brought to Australia by a group called Multi-Net comprised of Jews and Christians, met senior politicians, including Attorney-General Philip Ruddock, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Labor deputy leader Julia Gillard.

Private security was hired for Dr Sultan, who left Australia yesterday, and state police authorities were also made aware of her movements in the country. The organisers of her visit asked the media to not publish anything about her stay until she had left the country because of security-related concerns.

Dr Sultan said Islam was a “political ideology” that was wrongly perceived to have a moderate and hardline following. “That’s why the West has to monitor the majority of Muslims because you don’t know when they’re ready to be activated. Because they share the same basic belief, that’s the problem,” said the 50-year-old, who was last year featured in Time magazine’s list of the 100 most influential people in the world.

The Australian, 21 August 2007

The ‘double standards’ of the Crown Prosecution Service

Right-wing Islamophobe Adrian Morgan (of the notorious Western Resistance blog) joins the ranks of commentators expressing indignation at the behaviour of West Midlands Police and the Crown Prosecution Service over the Channel 4 documentary “Undercover Mosque” (on which, Morgan reminds us, “the respected journalist Martin Bright” acted as consultant).

Morgan charges the CPS with double standards, for prosecuting the leader of the “politically incorrect” (sic) BNP under the racial hatred law while refusing to take action against Muslim “preachers of hate”. This, Morgan opines, demonstrates that “law and order are not applied fairly to all”, i.e. that the state discriminates in favour of minority ethnic communities against the white majority. Which is, of course, the very same ludicrous racist fantasy that the BNP itself promotes.

Morgan writes: “The Crown Prosecution Service took the bizarre decision to prosecute Nick Griffin, the leader of the far-right British National Party, for statements he had made privately in 2004, but were filmed undercover by the BBC. Griffin had called Islam ‘a wicked and vicious faith’ that was turning Britain into ‘a multi-racial hell-hole’, and was prosecuted for inciting racial hatred. Twice. When he was acquitted by a jury for the second time on November 10, 2006, Gordon Brown suggested that race hate laws should be tightened – even though Islam is not, nor has it ever been, a race.

“The Crown Prosecution Service employs double standards. It engages in dogged attempts to prosecute the leader of a ‘politically incorrect’ party, while trying to have a documentary maker prosecuted for highlighting the genuine extremist statements made in some of Britain’s mosques. Yet it does not try to prosecute those preachers of hate – showing how law and order are not applied fairly to all. A free society should have a free press, a free media, and should allow its citizens to express their freedom of speech. Gordon Brown, who is now the unelected prime minister, would stifle all criticism of Islam under race hate laws, but Islamist preachers can apparently spew hatred of Britain, its people and its armed forces, with impunity.”

Family Security Matters, 21 August 2007

Although he reproduces it in his article, evidently Morgan hasn’t bothered to read the joint statement by West Midlands Police and CPS, which states quite clearly that it was the West Midlands Police who wanted to prosecute Channel 4 for inciting hatred and the CPS who rejected the proposal on technical grounds. But what can you expect from the idiot who once claimed that one of the individuals associated with Islamophobia Watch is the former secretary of the Workers Revolutionary Party!

Head count belies vision of ‘Eurabia’

Muhammad is the second most popular name for newborn boys in Britain, if you add together the various spellings. In the Seine-St-Denis suburb of Paris, Mohamed is number one. In the four biggest Dutch cities in 2005, either Mohamed or Mohammed came top.

Facts like these have led some pundits to forecast the Islamicisation of Europe – a future “Eurabia”. Bernard Lewis, a scholar of Islam, cited the immigration from Muslim countries and relatively high birth-rates of immigrants as trends that mean “Europe will have Muslim majorities in the population by the end of the twenty-first century at the latest”.

Most academics who have analysed the demographics dismiss such predictions. Jytte Klausen, a professor of politics at Brandeis University who studies European Muslims, says: “It’s being advocated by people who don’t consult the numbers. All these claims are really emotional claims.”

Nominal Muslims – whether religious or not – account for 3-4 per cent of the European Union’s total population of 493m. Their percentage should rise, but far more modestly than the extreme predictions.

Financial Times, 20 August 2007

Essential misreading

“It is a neocon myth that the left in Britain has compromised its principles in its opposition to the war on terror. On the contrary, for the left or genuine liberals not to have made common cause with Muslims in opposition to military aggression and lawlessness, or defended the Muslim community against racism and Islamophobic attacks, would have been the real betrayal of progressive principles, including that of solidarity with the powerless.”

Seumas Milne replies to Andrew Anthony: Comment is Free, 20 August 2007

Yet another right-wing Islamophobic defence of ‘Undercover Mosque’

Leo-McKinstry“Freedom of speech is one of the cornerstones of our democracy. The open exchange of views and the expression of controversial opinions are bulwarks against tyranny. Yet the British tradition of liberty is now increasingly under threat because of the state’s cowardly policy of trying to appease radical Islam.

“In the name of promoting a spirit of tolerance, our civic institutions have become ruthlessly intolerant of anyone who dares to challenge some of the most repellent features of hardline Islamism, such as misogyny, the contempt for human rights and the resort to violence for political ends. Blanket accusations of racism are regularly used to suppress debate about the problems caused by Islam.

“Britain fought the last war against an anti-semitic, book-burning, totalitarian regime. Yet in a bizarre twist, the modern British Government now acts as the guardian of those Muslims who want to see an Islamic version of just such a regime in this country. In a monstrous inversion of our values, those seeking to uphold our freedoms against Muslim fundamentalism are now the target of state repression.

“The British bobby, once a symbol of robust common sense, is rapidly being transformed into an agent of the race-fixated thought police. Perhaps the most worrying recent example of this trend was the outrageous conduct of the West Midlands police over a Channel 4 investigation into extremism within Birmingham’s mosques – Undercover Mosque.”

Leo McKinstry in the Daily Express, 20 August 2007

Seven-year-old Muslim boy stopped in US on suspicion of being a terrorist

Javaid IqbalFor seven-year-old Javaid Iqbal, the holiday to Florida was a dream trip to reward him for doing well at school. But he was left in tears after he was stopped repeatedly at airports on suspicion of being a terrorist.

The security alerts were triggered because Javaid shares his name with a Pakistani man deported from the US, prompting staff at three airports to question his family about his identity. The family even missed their flight home from the U.S. after officials cancelled their tickets in the confusion. And Javaid’s passport now contains a sticker saying he has undergone high-level security checks.

Salim Mulla, secretary of the Lancashire Council of Mosques, said: “It is ridiculous, I’m shocked. They really should have known he was only a seven-year-old child. I do understand the reasons but this was over the top. I can understand the safety aspect but it doesn’t help relationships with different faiths.”

Daily Mail, 20 August 2007

Leyton mosque welcomes decision over ‘Undercover Mosque’

Masjid al-Tawhid 2A documentary featuring a mosque in Leyton has been criticised by police for giving a distorted picture of Islamic teaching. Channel 4’s Undercover Mosque documentary, broadcast in January, featured Masjid al-Tawhid, in Leyton High Road, alongside other mosques and imams around Britain.

Speeches by Shaykh Suhaib Hassan, senior imam at Masjid-al-Tawhid, were among those used in the programme, which claimed to have uncovered extremist preachers encouraging violence against women, homosexuals and non-Muslims.

But West Midlands Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have criticised the documentary’s makers Hardcash Productions for editing speeches to make them appear more inflammatory.

Shaykh Hassan’s son, Dr Usama Hassan, who is vice-chairman and one of the imams at Masjid al-Tawhid, described the police’s assessment as entirely accurate. He said:

“We have given thousands of hours of positive, wholesome, sensible teaching, teaching people to be good citizens as well as good Muslims. It’s egg on their faces for Dispatches and Hardcash. It was a very poor documentary cobbled together in a great hurry, and hopefully they’ll learn from it and be more balanced and professional.

“We should be able to have honest dialogue and that includes criticism. People should be able to politely make their point. Journalists have to have a sense of responsibility. Things like this can be as dangerous as religious fanatics causing problems.”

Waltham Forest Guardian, 18 August 2007

Racist graffiti in South Wales park

Racist graffiti has been daubed all over a problem-plagued Neath family park. Messages of hate – which included “blacks and Muslims out” – were scrawled on walls and floors at Gnoll Country Park. Local councillor and racial equality champion Peter Rees said: “Gnoll Country Park is a place where many families and nationalities go. So, to have racist graffiti sprayed there is totally unacceptable.” A local mum, who did not want to be named, said: “They were sprayed all over the floor and near the memorial. “They read ‘blacks and Muslims out’ – I could not believe what I was seeing.”

South Wales Evening Post, 17 August 2007