Mad Mel to join BNP?

madmelMelanie Phillips explains why Britain is under threat from the Muslim hordes:

“Like much of Europe, Britain’s demographic composition is changing radically and very fast. At the most conservative estimate, its population of sixty million will rise over the next three decades by six or seven million, with 83 per cent of that new growth coming from immigration and most of that from the third world. The undesirability of such a drastic – and never debated – development is one of Britain’s great Unmentionables….

“The prevailing culture of non-discriminatory entitlement and minority rights meant the courts came to thwart all government attempts to enforce immigration controls. At root was the judges’ belief that the citizens of the world were entitled to exactly the same rights as the citizens of Britain. The result has been the deconstruction of British citizenship and the loss of sovereignty over national borders, laws and values…. the resulting chaos has made security impossible as the intelligence service has no means of keeping tabs on suspected terrorists.

“This was one of the key drivers behind the creation of what is known derisively as ‘Londonistan’, as Britain became the epicentre of the Islamic jihad in Europe. The country’s homage to freedom of speech, generous welfare entitlements and the fact that immigrants could simply lose themselves in the system turned Britain into a magnet for Islamist terrorists and extremists. But anyone who questioned the desirability of such trends was promptly denounced as a racist. Immigration was held to be an absolute good. Multiculturalism became the driving force of British life, ruthlessly policed by an army of local and national bureaucrats enforcing a doctrine of state-mandated virtue to promote racial, ethnic and cultural difference and stamp out majority values….

“The more the free world defends itself, the more the Islamists claim they are under attack. So the more atrocities there are against the west, the more the Islamists claim they are victims of Islamophobia…. The national identity of Britain is based on a particular culture, history, language, religion, law, customs and values. It cannot still remain recognisably itself if it makes itself home to large numbers of people who cannot or do not wish to assimilate into that identity. That’s not racism. It’s national survival.”

TCS Daily, 11 May 2006

I’m increasingly coming round to the view that the ideal political home for Phillips would be the British National Party.

Islamophobia, a retrospective

“If propaganda is a weapon of war, Islam is under carpet bombing. Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels described the methods, which define those used today: ‘Concentrating the fire of all the media on one particular point – a single theme, a single enemy, a single idea – the campaign uses this concentration of all media, but progressively…’

“Theme: ‘War on Terror’ Enemy: Muslims. Addressing the 2006 AIPAC ‘Now is the Time to Stop Iran’ Conference, Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Daniel Gillerman summarized the Idea: ‘While it may be true – and probably is – that not all Muslims are terrorists, it also happens to be true that nearly all terrorists are Muslim.’ Former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami put it another way: ‘the West needs an enemy, and this time it is Islam. And Islamophobia becomes part of all policies of the great powers, of hegemonic powers’.”

Trish Schuh in Counterpunch, 6 May 2006

Australian Muslims reject attack by Cardinal Pell

The Islamic Council of Victoria have put out a media release in response to an article on Islam by Cardinal George Pell, Catholic Archbishop of Sydney, which drew on such writers as Daniel Pipes, Andrew Bostom and William Dalrymple to portray Islam as an inherently violent religion that poses a threat to Western democracies.

Dervish weblog, 5 May 2006

Predictably, Robert Spencer rallies to Pell’s defence: Dhimmi Watch, 5 May 2006

See also “Aussie Muslims slam priest for ‘ignorant’ Qur’an remarks”, Islam Online, 5 May 2006

Bush’s historian

“… in recent years his ideas have been based less and less on solid research, and directed more and more towards providing a scholarly veneer for the Bush administration’s Middle East policies. His track record in that area is pretty bad. He was one of the key figures promoting the invasion of Iraq and, presumably drawing on his knowledge of Turkey, he argued that his chum Ahmad Chalabi, the convicted fraudster, could become an Iraqi version of Ataturk. More recently, he has had some batty thoughts about an Islamic takeover of Europe by the end of the century – a prediction that is now ‘widely accepted’ according to at least one fear-mongering American commentator.”

Brian Whitaker celebrates the 90th birthday of Bernard Lewis, the man who discovered the “clash of civilisations”.

Comment is Free, 2 May 2006

‘While Europe slept’

“In Europe’s supremely politically correct climate … it is considered racist and culturally oppressive to negatively talk about anything that is even peripherally related to Muslim immigration…. In many ways, Old Europe is already culturally destroyed. After the trauma of two world wars, Western Europe decided that its culture is not worth saving…. Anti-Americanism is not a philosophy that fills the void. Islam fills the vacuum more completely…. family unification rights are exploited in much of the European Union to bring whole clans of people from Muslim countries.”

David Forsmark in FrontPage Magazine, 3 May 2006

Still, it’s not all doom and gloom. Happily there are “small indications that there may be a silent majority in Europe who can be appealed to – Fortuyn, after all, probably would have been the Prime Minister of the Netherlands had he not been shot”.

Europe threatened by Muslim hordes (part 346)

Jamie Glazov interviews Morten Messerschmidt of the Danish People’s Party. “Tell us the impact that Muslim immigration is having on Europe”, Glazov asks, to which Messerschmidt replies:

“It is well know that the Muslim immigrants are disproportional in representing crime records; that the hate towards Jews is increasing in Europe, because of these groups. The serious mistreatment of women, which we see in the Muslim world, is now also taking place in Europe. Therefore, we know that the lack of labor-participation, which is connected to these people living on welfare, is an economic threat to the stability of our societies. In many European countries we speak about the necessity of changing the welfare-payments, but the truth is that if we did not have the Muslim burden, many of these changes would not be required.”

Front Page Magazine, 26 April 2006

US university won’t reprimand professor for racial slurs

Distancing itself from the remarks, Michigan State University (MSU) said professor Indrek Wichman was exercising his free speech right when describing Muslims as “brutal and uncivilized” and telling Muslim students to return to their “ancestral homelands.”

“He was cautioned that any additional commentary … could constitute the creation of a hostile environment, and that could … form the basis of a complaint,” Terry Denbow, a spokesman for MSU, was quoted as saying by Detroit Free Press. He stressed that the remarks, though “very inappropriate,” do not violate the university’s antidiscrimination policy.

In an e-mail to the university’s Muslim Students’ Association (MSA) on February 28, Wichman wrote: “I counsul [sic] you dissatisfied, agressive [sic], brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Moslems [sic] to be very aware of this as you proceed with your infantile ‘protests’.” He was referring to global protests against Danish cartoons that ridiculed Prophet Muhammad.

“If you do not like the values of the West – see the 1st Ammendment [sic] – you are free to leave. I hope for God’s sake that most of you choose that option. Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.”

The Muslim Students’ Association called Monday for the university to issue a letter of reprimand. They have met several times with university officials since February 28 and went public with the e-mail Monday because the school had not acted. The student group also wants the university to implement diversity training programs for faculty and a mandatory freshman seminar on hate and discrimination.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), America’s largest Muslim civil liberties group, has also urged the university to reprimand the professor.

“The university needs to take appropriate disciplinary action in this case to demonstrate through its actions that anti-Muslim bigotry will not be tolerated on campus,” Dawud Walid, head of the Michigan chapter of CAIR, said in a statement on the group’s website. He said that it is “unconscionable” for a professor to use his university e-mail account to “foster a hostile learning environment for Muslim students.”

Continue reading

Pipes warns against sharia law … in Tennessee!

Pipes 9-11In the USA the case of Bill Hobbs has become a cause célèbre for the Right.

In February, as part of his defence of Jyllands-Posten’s decision to publish anti-Muslim caricatures, Hobbs invited readers of his weblog to “exercise your right to free expression by drawing pictures of Islam’s Prophet Mohammed”. As his own contribution to this worthy cause, Hobbs posted a stick drawing of the Prophet holding a bomb. The cartoon was entitled “Mohammed Blows”.

In response to a (Christian) critic who accused him of showing “distasteful insensitivity to people of other faiths”, Hobbs wrote: “I am insensitive toward religions that have a large number of adherents who are running around blowing stuff up and threatening to kill non-believers over cartoons. Yes, I plead insensitivity. I would prefer my children not grow up in a world governed by Islamofacists.”

As a result of the furore, Hobbs resigned from his job as an editor and news writer on the marketing and communications staff at Belmont University in Nashville, the assumption being that he jumped before he was pushed. Hobbs was immediately adopted as a hero by right-wing bloggers in the US. And now Daniel Pipes has waded into the fray. According to Pipes, writing at FrontPage Magazine, “this firing in Tennessee amounts to a capitulation to Islamic law. Each surrender means the Shari‘a will move inexorably forward.”

I used to think that Pipes was perhaps marginally less barking than Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, but these days it’s becoming increasingly difficult to tell them apart.

Muslim ‘must pay for visa checks’

Mohammed Umar Haleem KhanA Muslim student had to pay extra for security checks when applying for a visa to visit the United States, because his name was Mohammed. Mohammed Umar Haleem Khan, 22, was told by US Embassy officials that “a lot of bad people” shared his name. The Manchester Metropolitan University student had to pay an extra $80 (£45) to have his fingerprints checked against a US terror suspect database.

Mr Khan was planning to work for the Camp America project in Philadelphia. He said: “She asked me all the usual questions like what was my purpose for visiting and what was the nature of my job and then she said there was a problem with my name. She said there were a lot of bad people in the world with that name, meaning terrorists…. I’m sure that if some white candidate came along there would have been no problem.”

Mr Khan added that he had never visited Afghanistan or any other trouble hotspots and could think of no reason why his name would cause a problem.

A spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain Inayat Bunglawala said: “This is a worrying incident and seems to fit a recent pattern whereby the USA appears to be treating all Muslims as potential terrorists just because of their religion. Although Muslim parents name their children from a wide variety of names – just like other parents – many of them, especially those from the Indian subcontinent, will often give their male children the name of Muhammad as a kind of respectful prefix in honour of the Prophet, even though the actual name by which these children are known will be something else.

“US Embassy officials ought really to have had the training to cope with basic elements of Muslim culture which would help prevent these kinds of unfortunate situations.”

BBC News, 24 April 2006