TUC urges action on Muslim plight

Muslim communities in Britain have faced too many “cheap calls to integrate” since last month’s London bomb attacks and should instead receive increased government funding to tackle widespread poverty and poor health, the TUC leader, Brendan Barber, said yesterday.

Publishing a report saying that people of Pakistani and Bangladeshi origin are among the most deprived in the UK, Mr Barber warned that greater social inclusion was being jeopardised by high levels of poverty that risked potentially fuelling extremist beliefs.

“Social deprivation and poverty is no excuse for criminality, but it can be a breeding ground for poisonous beliefs of all kinds,” he said. “Even if there had been no bomb attacks, a civilised country should not tolerate such high levels of poverty and deprivation.

“We have had too many cheap calls for Muslims to integrate, some of which have come close to asking people to give up crucial parts of their identity. Building a tolerant liberal society where we are all free to express the different sides that make up anyone’s identity will be that much harder when some groups suffer from such extreme levels of deprivation and poverty.”

The TUC’s report, to be launched by Mr Barber today at the East London mosque, calls for government job creation and other programmes to be targeted at Muslims from Pakistan and Bangladesh. Out of every 100 white people, 20 live below the government poverty line, but 69 out of every 100 Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in Britain live in poverty, the study says.

Guardian, 24 August 2005

See also “End UK Pakistani and Bangladeshi poverty and deprivation says TUC”, TUC press release, 19 August 2005

Another attack on ‘anti-semitic’ MCB

Brett Lock of Outrage! joins the witch-hunt against the Muslim Council of Britain, repeating the sort of accusations of anti-semitism that we’ve already heard from the likes of Rod Liddle. According to Lock, arguing that some of those responsible for the campaign against the MCB are pursuing a pro-Israel agenda is the same as blaming it all on a plot by “the Jews”.

Lock & Load, 23 August 2005

A disappointingly thin selection of links on this new blog, I notice. I’m sure Brett’s readers would appreciate being directed to some of his co-thinkers, such as Jihad Watch or Melanie Phillips.

MAB urges Home Secretary to be consistent

The Muslim Association of Britain today said that the Home Secretary Charles Clarke should try any terrorist suspects in the UK rather than deporting them. The organisation also queried what the definition of “terror” would be when judging if someone had “justified” or “glorified” it abroad.

Ahmed Al-Sheikh, President of MAB said:

“It’s only right that if someone is suspected of a crime that they should be tried for it. By saying the government is simply going to deport people instead, it leaves the suspicion that they are trying to appear tough on the issue. In reality, it’s not a very clever policy. To fight terrorism, the government needs to win hearts and minds through serious engagement and dialogue rather than introducing draconian measures which will alienate communities and erode civil liberties.

“One added complication seems to be the definition of terror which Mr Clarke has consistently avoided. We are concerned that recently the government has branded legitimate struggles against oppression and occupation as terrorism. This should not be the case, but if it is, then anyone glorifying or justifying the killings on the side of illegal military occupiers should also be guilty of inciting terror. There should not be a different moral standard whether the killing is carried out by homemade bombs or by F16s and tanks.”

MAB press release, 24 August 2005

Clarke unveils deportation rules

The home secretary has published the grounds on which foreigners considered to be promoting terrorism can be deported or excluded from the UK. Charles Clarke issued the list of “unacceptable behaviour” by those said to indirectly threaten public order, national security, or the rule of law. The grounds, drawn up after the 7 July London bombings, include provoking and glorifying terrorism.

But civil liberty groups fear deportees could be tortured in their homelands. Amnesty’s Halya Gowan said: “The vagueness and breadth of the definition of ‘unacceptable behaviour’ and ‘terrorism’ can lead to further injustice and risk further undermining human rights protection in the UK. And the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) says the list of “unacceptable behaviours” is “too wide and unclear”.

BBC News, 24 August 2005

Muslims must learn to appreciate football

Mike Baker offers his impressions of a conference of Muslim students in Leicester:

“They made an arresting sight. Many wore traditional caps, headscarves and flowing robes. There were plenty of beards amongst the young men. Incongruously, they met at the Walkers Stadium, the home of Leicester City Football Club. Welcoming them, the chief executive of the club asked how many of them were football fans. Only a small minority indicated they were.

“Hardly any had been to a match at the ground, even though they all came from fairly nearby, either Leicester itself, Coventry or Birmingham. This was a sharp reminder of the cultural divide that can exist. The Muslim community in Leicester is large and well-established. The football club is well supported in the city. But local Muslim students do not join their fellow white and black students on the terraces.”

BBC News, 23 September 2005

What is this – the “football test”? If so, this member of the Islamophobia Watch collective would certainly fail it.

Posted in UK

BBC defends Panorama’s Muslim film

The BBC has received 250 complaints about Sunday’s controversial Panorama documentary on the challenges faced by the Muslim community in the wake of the July 7 bombings, which was yesterday labelled “a complete travesty” by the Muslim Council of Britain.

The lobby group said yesterday that it planned to send a formal letter of complaint to the BBC director general, Mark Thompson, calling the programme “deeply dishonest”.

Guardian, 23 August 2005

See also “Muslims attack BBC over ‘unfair’ film”, Daily Telegraph, 23 August 2005

And “MCB demands BBC apology”, Islam Online, 23 August 2005

Panorama was a hatchet job on Muslims

“Being in denial has much in common with living a lie. The distorted picture in your mind becomes ever more detached from reality as it is challenged, to the extent that the two eventually bear no resemblance at all. That’s an apt description of the political and media reaction to the July bombings. Instead of directing the heat at politicians whose neo-colonial and Islamophobic motives led Britain into a quagmire in Iraq, the chattering classes have been digging the nation into an ever bigger hole by pointing the finger at its Muslim minority. Notwithstanding fitful spurts of interest in foreign policy, ‘the problem with Islam’ has become the dominant narrative.”

Faisal Bodi in the Independent, 23 August 2005

‘Talking freely about the enemy’

Daniel Pipes takes exception to the US State Department’s description of Tom Tancredo’s call to nuke Mecca as “insulting and offensive”, and to the sacking of radio talk show host Michael Graham for describing Islam as “a terrorist organisation”. Daniel explains:

“I do think it vital that they and others be able to conduct a freewheeling discussion about the Koran, jihad, radical Islam, Islamist terrorism, and related topics, without fearing a reprimand from the U.S. government or a loss of their livelihood…. nothing can be off limits in this debate; and there must be no penalty for those who express their views.”

Daniel Pipes blog, 22 August 2005

If these are ‘moderate’ Muslims, give me the lunatic fringe any day, says Liddle

If these are ‘moderate’ Muslims, give me the lunatic fringe any day

By Rod Liddle

Evening Standard, 23 August 2005

I hope you’ve already got your tickets for today’s gig at the London School of Economics by Imam Zaid Shakir. It’s going to be a sell-out and Zaid will be reprising his popular hit: “We Are All Collateral Damage in the War Against Terror”.

The good imam is one of those “respected” and “moderate” Muslims who has “condemned” the terrorist attacks upon London last month “unequivocally”.

You may judge for yourself whether that cumbersome superfluity of quotation marks is warranted by mulling over his assertion that both the 7 July terrorists and our own Prime Minister are “self-righteous murderers whose motives and proclamations mirror each other.”

For Mr Shakir, there is no distinction whatever to be made between a democratically elected politician and a fanatical medieval nutter with seven pounds of gelignite strapped to his waist. There’s condemned unequivocally and “condemned unequivocally”.

I don’t know if Ticketmaster has any seats left for Zaid’s performance, but you can always check the man out by tapping “Muslim Council of Britain” into Google and scrolling down its list of affiliates: Zaid’s gig is keenly awaited by a whole bunch of respected, moderate Muslims (you can supply your own quotation marks from here on in).

Continue reading