Rally in support of Sheepshead Bay mosque

Sheepshead Bay mosque supporters

Rev. Matthew Westfox (Associate Minister at All Souls Bethlehem Church), playing the guitar and leading a sing-along of Woodie Guthrie’s, “This Land is Your Land” at the proposed building site of a mosque at Sheepshead Bay. Rev. Westfox stepped into the controversial fray on the side of religious freedom.

Only The Blog Knows Brooklyn, 27 September 2010

Across the road, opponents of the Sheepshead Bay mosque turned out to protest against it for the second Sunday running. Last week the Brooklyn Tea Party was behind the demonstration, this week (see placard below) it was a group calling themselves Bay People Inc., who had organised a previous rally back in June.

Sheepshead Bay anti-mosque placard

See also The Brooklyn Paper, 27 September 2010

Update:  And see “Brooklyn mosque rally turns ugly”, The Brooklyn Ink, 1 October 2010

Zakir Naik appeal hearing set for 20 October

Zakir_NaikAn Islamic scholar barred from entering the UK for his “unacceptable behaviour” has won the first round of his court battle against the Home Secretary’s ruling. A High Court judge decided the case for Dr Zakir Naik should be fast-tracked despite objections from Theresa May’s lawyers.

Dr Naik’s solicitor Tayab Ali is being assisted by two QCs from the chambers of Tony Blair’s wife Cherie Booth. He said: “It is manifestly unfair to proceed to judgment on the basis of remarks made many years previously.” Mr Ali added: “His comments have been taken extremely selectively and completely out of context.”

Dr Naik, 44, was banned from coming to Britain on June 16 for a charity tour. His supporters said the decision was blatant political posturing and unfair victimisation. The founder and chairman of global satellite channel Peace TV was due to address thousands in London, Birmingham and Sheffield. He has given more than 1,300 lectures around the world in the past 20 years.

Mr Justice Nichol ordered a two-day hearing to begin on October 20.

Sunday Express, 26 September 2010


Stand by for a renewed campaign from the right-wing press against Dr Naik and those who have opposed the ban. See for example “Anti-terror chief tried to secure UK entry for Muslim preacher” in the Daily Telegraph, which adds little to a report that appeared in the Sunday Times back in August.

For an illustration of the double standards applied by the Home Office when it comes to determining who is allowed into the country, see “Hindutva terrorist enters UK” in the Pakistan Daily Mail and Sunny Hundal’s post at Pickled Politics.

PCC upholds complaint against Daily Star over ‘Muslim-only public loos’ story

Muslim-Only Public LoosThe ever-excellent Tabloid Watch draws our attention to yesterdays’s Daily Star, which reports that the Press Complaints Commission has upheld a complaint against the paper over its front page story, about a shopping centre in Rochdale installing “squat” toilets, which was headlined “MUSLIM-ONLY PUBLIC LOOS” with the sub-heading “Council wastes YOUR money on hole-in-ground toilets”.

As ENGAGE pointed out at the time, this non-issue, involving just two toilets in one shopping centre in Greater Manchester, was blown up into a major controversy by the Daily Express and other papers – and even by the BBC, who as ENGAGE observed “once again picked up on a non-story, utilised by the right-wing press to foment fear about the ‘Islamification’ of Britain”.

(The Daily Star followed up the story with another front-page article, based on information from an anonymous source that the toilets were being reconsidered, which was headlined “DAILY STAR BLOCKS MUSLIM-ONLY LOOS!” with the sub-heading “We get hole-in-the-ground toilets banned”.)

Continue reading

Patriot Alliance takes stand against killing of Murfreesboro Muslims who leave Islam

Patriotic Alliance press conferenceA newly-formed group of local citizens concerned about teachings under Islam’s Shariah Law called for the imam of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro to sign a Pledge of Friendship Friday.

The Patriot Alliance of Rutherford County called a press conference at Grace Baptist Church on Bradyville Pike, next door to the site of the Islamic Center’s new construction site.

The Pledge of Friendship asks local Imam Ossama Bahloul to declare, among other things, banning the teaching of Redda Law, the part of Shariah Law that “allows the killing of Muslims who leave Islam,” the killing of homosexuals, and not to allow the facility to be used for fundraising or teachings that contradict the U.S. Constitution and other national laws.

The pledge was based on a document presented to the imam in of the mosque in Temecula, Ca., earlier in the week, said Lou Ann Zelenik, the group’s spokesperson, who also ran in the Republican primary for the Congressional seat to be vacated Rep. Bart Gordon. “I think it’s important we remain unified across the nation,” she said.

Speaking on behalf of evangelical pastors affiliated with the group was Pastor Darryl Whaley of Kingdom Ministries Worship Center in Walter Hill. He said the group was invited to attend an event to promote peace and tolerance earlier this month at the Islamic Center, but that the clergy did not have time to consult with their congregation on a week’s notice.

He said that even though the pastors respect the rights of Muslims to pray and practice their religion, “we continue to have fundamental differences in faith and practice,” and did not want their congregations to be confused by “joining hands under the banner of tolerance and religious freedom.”

The Tennessean, 24 September 2010


See also the WGNS report which reproduces the Patriot Alliance’s list of demands.

Imam Bahloul is also required to renounce “Shariah doctrine which justifies violence and abuse of women and children” and to refrain from teaching the doctrine of jihad, on the grounds that it compels Muslims to “engage in war so that Islam will dominate the world”. And, as we all know, “when Islam becomes dominant, Non-Muslims are offered three options: to convert to Islam, to pay Jizya (a humiliating tax), or to be killed”. Who would want that fate to befall the citizens of Murfreesboro?

But don’t get the idea that the Patriot Alliance of Rutherford County is insensitive to the needs of minority ethno-religious communities. Not at all. They insist that Imam Bahloul should also recognise that “the Islamic teaching that Muslims must ‘fight and kill all Jews before the end of days’ is totally unacceptable”.

Update:  See also “Rutherford Co. religious leaders unite in support of mosque”, WKRN, 24 September 2010

Texas education board adopts anti-Islam resolution

AUSTIN, Texas — The Texas State Board of Education adopted a resolution Friday that seeks to curtail references to Islam in Texas textbooks, as social conservative board members warned of what they describe as a creeping Middle Eastern influence in the nation’s publishing industry.

The board approved the one-page nonbinding resolution, which urges textbook publishers to limit what they print about Islam in world history books, by a 7-5 vote.

Critics say it’s another example of the ideological board trying to politicize public education in the Lone Star State. Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, which advocates for religious freedom, questioned why the resolution came at a time when “anti-Muslim rhetoric in this country has reached fever pitch.”

“It’s hard not to conclude that the misleading claims in this resolution are either based on ignorance of what’s in the textbooks or, on the other hand, are an example of fear-mongering and playing politics,” Miller said.

Associated Press, 24 September 2010

See also Texas Tribune, 24 September 2010

Italy: veil ban back in the spotlight

National debate over a “burqa ban” was back in the spotlight on Tuesday following an official request for the Senate to discuss the security implications of Islamic face coverings. Senator Ada Spadoni Urbani of Premier Silvio Berlusconi’s People of Freedom party group (PdL) presented a motion on behalf of her party addressing the issue. The motion is aimed “at resolving the public security issues raised by the custom of wearing the burqa or other clothing that prevents accurate identification,” she explained. “This is not intended to discriminate in any way against religious beliefs”.

The rightwing Northern League party promised a bill on the issue on Friday, while a row has been simmering for a number of days over whether a mother should be permitted to wear a face veil while dropping her child off at nursery school. Other parents at the school in the small Lazio village of Sonnino had reportedly complained to the school’s head that the woman’s niqab scared their own children. On Monday, Sonnino Mayor Gino Cesare Gasbarrone announced a compromise had been reached following a meeting with all parties whereby the woman had agreed to remove the veil once on the school premises.

Meanwhile, the Northern League proposal, a translation of the recently approved French bill, will join eight other draft laws already under consideration by parliament. The bill would prevent women from wearing a face veil in public, including in schools, on public transport or in any kind of office. The penalty for transgressors would be a fine of between 150 and 300 euros or alternatively some kind of community service “aimed at encouraging integration”, explained League Deputy Whip Carolina.

But unlike other proposals, the new bill will also punish anyone “who forces someone else to wear it, using either physical or psychological violence”. This offence would be punishable by a year in prison and a 30,000 euro fine.

A 1975 law already prohibits any mask or clothing that makes it impossible to identify the wearer. In its current form, it permits exceptions for “justified cause”, which has been interpreted as including religious reasons in court rulings against local attempts to ban the burqa and niqab. Most of the bills currently before the Italian parliament would amend the 1975 law to make specific reference to Islamic face coverings.

Commenting on the Sonnino case, Isabella Bertolini of the PdL said the case demonstrated a “growing imperative for a complete ban on the burqa in all places, not just in schools”. “Our society’s flexibility leads our institutions at all levels to interpret laws in the most politically correct way possible, causing incalculable damage,” she said.

ANSA, 21 September 2010

Republican candidate attacks ‘victory mosque’ in campaign ad

A Republican House candidate claims in new ad that Muslims want to build a “victory mosque” near Ground Zero.

The building of an Islamic cultural center and mosque near Ground Zero has faded from the midterm campaign conversation over the past week, but here’s an ad that might change that. It’s the first offering from the campaign of Republican Renee Ellmers, who is challenging Rep. Bob Etheridge (D-N.C.), and the message is a provocative one.

“After the Muslims conquered Jerusalem and Cordoba and Constantinople, they built victory mosques,” the ad’s narrator says. “And now, they want to build a mosque by ground zero. Where does Bob Etheridge stand? He won’t say.”

The Hill, 21 September 2010

Daniel Pipes accuses Obama of enforcing Sharia law

Pipes 9-11Over at the Washington Times Daniel Pipes opines that he found Pastor Terry Jones’ plan to ban the Qur’an “distasteful”. But the actual object of his attack is the Obama administration, who Pipes claims capitulated to the threat of “Muslim violence” when they persuaded Jones to call off his book-burning stunt.

Pipes explains: “That violence stems from Islamic law, Shariah, which insists that Islam, and the Koran in particular, enjoy a privileged status. Islam ferociously punishes anyone, Muslim or non-Muslim, who trespasses against Islam’s sanctity.”

Pipes concludes with the following charge against the Obama administration: “Its pressure on Mr. Jones further eroded freedom of speech about Islam and implicitly established Islam’s privileged status in the United States, whereby Muslims may insult others but not be insulted. This moves the country toward dhimmitude, a condition whereby non-Muslims acknowledge the superiority of Islam. Finally, Mr. Obama, in effect, enforced Islamic law, a precedent that could lead to other forms of compulsory Shariah compliance.”

Pipes has found himself rather sidelined recently by more newsworthy Islamophobes like Pamela Geller or Newt Gingrich. Maybe this is Pipes’ attempt to show he is still a major player when it comes to whipping up hysteria against the US Muslim community.