Muslims are the real threat, claims Nazi

A Nazi argues that the traditional fascist emphasis on resisting the supposed Jewish control of government and society is now outmoded:

“… the world is facing a bigger threat. Right now our whole way of life is under a threat of the magnitude that no Jew has ever presented us: Sharia Law. Little by little, piece by piece Blair is facilitating the Muslim take over of our society. Burger King remove icecreams because a squiggle on the packaging looks like ‘Allah’. A council removes pictures of pigs during Ramadan. They are pushing and pushing – seeing what they can get away with. If they are refused it’s ‘Islamophobia’. How long before all pork is banned because of ‘Islamophobia’. How long before we are told what to wear, what to drink, what to say?

“At the moment our society is the best on the world (even if it is run by some secret group of Jews!!) Compare our way of life to the real enemy: People who’ll flog your feet for listening to music or being clean shaven. People who’ll behead you for drinking a lager…. Groups like Hisb ut Tarir want an Islamic world, with white people as subservients – paying tax to their caliph king. Despite the noise made by Blair, they are still all around us and still getting stronger.

“Obesssion with ZOG [Zionist Occupation/Occupied Government] is a distraction. Fuck it – forget about the Jews. Focus on the real enemy. Defending the Jews isn’t something I make a habit of, but at least they are more or less like us…. The Jews don’t eat pork, but they don’t shove their religion down our throats, but there are people out there who will – if we lose sight of who the real enemies are.”

Combat 18 Blood & Honour discussion forum, 13 October 2005

‘Don’t sacrifice free speech to appease the Muslim fanatics’ says McKinstry

Leo McKinstry in the Express usefully summarises all the lies and distortions promoted by opponents of the religious hatred bill. “It is a scandal that centuries of the right to free expression can be overthrown because of the craven wish to appease Islamic extremism.” You know the sort of thing.

McKinstry claims: “Our laws already provide ample protection against genuine hate crimes. In 2003, for instance, Mark Norwood, a British National party activist in Shropshire, was prosecuted under the Public Order Act for displaying a poster which read: ‘Islam out of Britain’.”

In fact, the successful prosecution of Norwood was not for inciting hatred – he was convicted (in 2002) on the relatively minor charge of causing religiously aggravated “harassment, alarm or distress”. An attempt to convict another BNP member, Dick Warrington, under racial hatred legislation for displaying a poster with the same “Islam Out of Britain” slogan failed because Islam is not a mono-ethnic religion and therefore it is held that Muslims cannot be victims of racial hatred.

It is nonsense to claim, as McKinstry does, that only Muslim organisations back the proposed new law. The Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Church of England, the Catholic Bishops of England and Wales, the Hindu Council and the Network of Sikh Organisations are among those who support the Bill.

And so on, and so forth.

Continue reading

Revealed: the heroin smuggling shame of Islamic leader’s father

The Mail on Sunday makes an issue of the fact that Inayat Bulglawala’s father was convicted of smuggling heroin back in the 1980s. As Inayat patiently explained to them: “We have a principal in Islam that sins are not inherited. It wasn’t me who committed the crime.” Other papers, to their credit, appear to have ignored the Mail‘s crude stitch-up. However, it did strike a chord with the fascists.

See BNP news article, 4 September 2005

‘The next victims of Islamic terror’ – BNP

“The July attacks on the capital’s transport systems were the opening salvos from the forces of the 5th columnists who have nothing less than the total Islamification of these islands as their ultimate goal. Western ideas … have been undermined by Britain’s Open Door immigration policy which has allowed nearly 2 million adherents of an alien faith walk in and settle here.”

BNP news article, 26 August 2005

BNP launch anti-mosque campaign

Community leaders and residents have spoken out against a BNP campaign to stop plans for a £1.5 million purpose-built mosque in Stoke-on-Trent.

The British National Party yesterday began distributing 20,000 leaflets which claim the mosque, to be built in Regent Road, Hanley, will be an eyesore, with prayers heard throughout the city via loudspeakers. It also claims the 600-capacity mosque will end up being built with council taxpayers’ cash and cause traffic chaos in the city centre.

Rana Tufail, director of the Islamic Centre, in Shelton, said the far-right party was scaremongering. He believes the mosque will be a credit to the city when it is completed.

Members of the public also say they have no problem with the mosque being built and criticised the BNP’s tactics.

Continue reading

Ban public servants wearing headscarves – Dutch opinion poll

A majority of the Dutch public wants a new law to ban public servants from wearing headscarves or “other Islamic attire”, a new poll has found. Polling organisation TNS Nipo carried out the research for the latest edition of independent magazine Binnenlands Bestuur.

Expatica, 5 August 2005

Needless to say, this meets with approval of Rebecca Bynum: Dhimmi Watch, 7 August 2005

The news is also greeted enthusiastically by the fascists of the BNP, who seem to be getting a lot of their inspiration from Ms Bynum and her colleague Robert Spencer these days: “Once again plucky Netherlanders are unravelling the multi-cultural experiment forced upon them by decadent and traitorous politicians. Seen for years as the most easy going, tolerant and liberal nation in Europe, the Dutch people are fighting back to reclaim their society from the twisted multi-culturalists.”

BNP news article, 7 August 2005

However, a closer reading of the Expatica report indicates that it wasn’t in fact “the Dutch public” whose views were surveyed: “TNS Nipo questioned 433 adults – 292 government employees and 50 municipal aldermen – for the poll.”

Muslims invest money in London shock

“One city is emerging as the preferred city for Qu’ran friendly, Shariah compliant property investments and it is not Mecca, Ankara, Dubai or Tehran, it’s London! Yes London is the favourite place for wealthy Muslims to invest their money…. London based branches of global banks and investment funds are falling over themselves arranging for wealthy oil sheikhs, heroin exporters and feudal pillaging warlords to buy up Britain’s shopping centres, tower blocks and country estates. Maybe this is desirable, the lesser of the two evils forced upon us by our ‘Shariah compliant’ government which has eased regulation to allow these financial practices – at least these new landlords have too much money to even think about strapping explosives around their waist.”

BNP news article, 7 August 2005

Nazis denounce ‘life in multi-cultural Britain’

“Multi-culturalism might mean a variety of charming ethnic restaurants for the Islington ‘in-crowd’ but for the vast majority of the indigenous population the mass importation of people from all corners of the globe to act as cheap labour has been an unmitigated disaster. For some unfortunate families in housing schemes across the land, multi-culturalism has made their lives living hell.”

The BNP spews out more filth about “how terrible life can be on housing schemes where whites have to live cheek by jowl with young Muslim thugs who are clearly intent to carry out ethnic cleansing of the unbelievers from what they consider to be ‘their’ areas”.

BNP news article, 3 August 2005