Torygraph promotes Islamic reform

“There are signs that a reform movement may emerge among this country’s two million Muslims, aimed at developing an interpretation of Islam that is compatible with liberal democracy. At present the chief spokesmen for Islam are quick to assume the mantle of victimhood and inclined to condemn all criticism as Islamophobia, a pseudo-psychiatric term implying fear and irrational hostility. But a younger generation is emerging, confident that their faith is a guide to a good life but aware that mainstream Islam embodied in Sharia law needs reform.

“The inequality of women under the law will never be acceptable in the West. The freedom to criticise religious beliefs and to join and leave faith traditions as individual conscience dictates is simply not consistent with the Muslim habit of threatening apostates with death. The view that the Koran must be binding for all time is not compatible with our commitment to learning from each other through free inquiry and the clash of opinion. The year 2008 could see the beginnings of a liberal British Islam willing to embrace equality under the law, freedom of religion, and freedom of interpretation.”

David Green of right-wing think-tank Civitas in the Sunday Telegraph, 30 December 2007


Note the sleight of hand here. Green applauds the development of “an interpretation of Islam that is compatible with liberal democracy” (so you can’t accuse him of being an anti-Muslim bigot, can you?) while simultaneously asserting that mainstream Islam in the UK – which he identifies with the oppression of women, death threats against apostates and a literalist intepretation of the Qur’an – is incompatible with liberal democracy.

But Civitas specialises in this sort of double-talk on Islam. See for example here.

Another non-terrorist imprisoned

Taliban Fanatic...“A Halifax man with extreme Islamic beliefs has been jailed for four years. Rizwan Mahmood Ditta, 29, of Royd Terrace, Savile Park, supported the Taliban and the July 7 London bombings, a court heard. He admitted two offences under the Terrorism Act.

“Ditta, an English tutor for Asians in Halifax, would have been keen to take part in terrorist activity, said prosecutor Jonathan Sharp. Video footage found in his possession, showed military vehicles being blown up and audio messages encouraging terrorism.

“Ditta was arrested when counter-terrorism officers raided his Halifax home in January. He was charged with two counts of having data on a computer hard drive that contained information likely to be useful to a person preparing an act of terrorism.”

Halifax Courier, 18 December 2007

An accompanying editorial describes Ditta as having engaged in “a subtle type of terrorism” and observes: “Some may feel the sentence is lenient for a person described as supporting the Taliban and the London bombings on 7/7.”

Some, on the other hand, may note that Ditta didn’t actually engage in any form of terrorism at all, “subtle” or otherwise, nor did the prosecution present any evidence that he intended to do so. He was charged on the basis of downloading material from the internet.

As for the supposed “leniency” of the four-year prison sentence, some may wish to contrast that with the two-and-half-years that BNP member Robert Cottage received after being convicted of possessing explosives.

‘Geert Wilders is evil, and evil has to be stopped’

Doekle TerpstraThe welcome campaign launched by the prominent Christian Democrat and former trade unionist Doekle Terpstra against anti-Muslim racist Geert Wilders has been roundly denounced by the Right.

At Pipeline News Bella Rabinowitz (who finds it significant that the campaign is supported by “the ultra-left Amnesty International”) denounces Terpstra’s initiative as an attempt to deny freedom of speech to Geert Wilders and claims that “the assault on Wilders is reminiscent of the hysteria which led to the assassination of another Dutch politician, Pim Fortuyn”.

Over at the Brussels Journal Thomas Landen opines: “Last month one of Holland’s most prestigious institutes, the University of Leiden, appointed the Islamist ideologue Tariq Ramadan to the post of professor of Islamology. Mr Ramadan is at least as controversial as Mr Wilders. One wonders why Mr Terpstra, contrary to Mr Wilders, did not oppose Mr Ramadan’s appointment. Mr Terpstra did not make any effort to say ‘Tariq Ramadan is evil, and has to be stopped’. Why has no-one heard him call upon his countrymen ‘to rise in order to stop Ramadan’?”

‘Muslim prayer beds’ – more lies from the Daily Star

Dewsbury Hospital“Hospital chiefs who told nurses to point Muslim patients’ beds towards Mecca five-times-a-day last night climbed down. They said they would now only do it for the ‘terminally ill’. Nurses had been breaking off from health care duties to perform the ritual at Dewsbury and District Hospital in West Yorks….

“There were claims last night that the bed shifting policy almost cost one 80-year-old her life. Staff at Dewsbury Hospital were so busy gran Mavis Fox was able to slip out unnoticed and walk over three miles home. She was rushed back after falling and gashing her head. Overworked nurses had failed to spot that she was missing. Mavis’s family are now fuming that she was able to walk out.

“One angry relative said: ‘They said the nurse was busy and they didn’t have enough staff. My gran could have died that day. It was really cold and no one even knew that she’d gone. If they can make moving beds for Muslims a priority why can’t they make it a priority to look after other patients?'”

Daily Star, 6 December 2007


There has been no “climb down” by the Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust. There never was a policy of moving Muslim patients’ beds five times a day, nor were there any plans to implement such a policy. Read the original press release by the Trust and their correction of the Daily Star‘s lies here.

A shabby triumph

Geoffrey Alderman reckons that the Sudan teddy bear incident was manuipulated by the British Government  in order to allow UK Muslims to gain some positive publicity for speaking out against the jailing of Gillian Gibbons and intervening on her behalf with the Sudanese government.

Clearly annoyed at being unable to smear the Muslim Council of Britain in general and Inayat Bunglawala in particular as being supporters of barbarism, Alderman constructs a conspiracy theory to… smear the MCB and UK Muslims.

Comment Is Free, 5 December 2007

Giving aid and comfort to Muslim terrorists and their Koranic jihad

The Christian fundamentalist website Movieguide.org is not happy about the new Brian DePalma directed film Redacted. With a summary of the film that it is “Giving aid and comfort to Muslim terrorists and their Koranic jihad”, the website lists its complaints:

“REDACTED is a controversial left-wing movie about two despicable American soldiers in Iraq leading a raid to rape and murder a teenage Iraqi girl and her family. This unbalanced, abhorrent movie will be used as propaganda by the brutal anti-Christian, anti-American Muslim terrorists who want to murder anyone who opposes their totalitarian aims.”

With attitudes towards women making up a substantial part of criticisms of Muslims in the 21st Century it is interesting to note that one of Movieguide.org’s complaints is of “an anti-American diatribe by some goofy-looking young woman on the Internet”.

‘Pat Condell at his brilliant, hilarious and topical best’

At least, that’s how the fascists of the BNP describe the latest anti-Muslim video from the National Secular Society’s favourite comedian. This one is on the Gillian Gibbons case: “Well, it’s another public relations triumph for Islam…. I bet they’re even laughing at this over in Pakistan.” Pakistan and its inhabitants, of course, being a byword for ignorance and backwardness.

But could Condell not at least give credit to the Muslim Council of Britain, I hear you ask, for their unequivocal condemnation of Gillian Gibbons’ arrest and conviction? But you’re forgetting, according to Condell the MCB are nothing more than “duplicitous, mealy-mouthed, unprincipled, terrorist-sympathising scum“.

Opposing the mega-mosque … on the basis of bigotry and ignorance

Andy Armitage, former editor of Gay & Lesbian Humanist and the man responsible for its notorious “Sick face of Islam” issue (“redundant churches are sprouting onion domes and minarets. We are becoming strangers in our own land”), offers his insights into the dispute over the proposed Newham mosque:

“The ultra-orthodox Muslim group Tablighi Jamaat are behind the building. Among their adherents has been the Glasgow airport bomber, Kafeel Ahmed, the ‘shoe bomber’ Richard Reid and two of the 7/7 bombers…. And the fact that it could be stuck right in the middle of the British landscape is obviously worrying its opponents.”

Armitage warns that the building “could become Europe’s biggest mosque, with a capacity [of] 70,000 (according to last weeks Sunday Times), which is only 10,000 fewer than the proposed Olympic stadium only 500 yards away”. The Sunday Times article he links to is in fact from November 2005 – and the plans by architects Mangera Yvars to which the article refers have since been scrapped.

But don’t get the idea that the atheist Armitage is dogmatically opposed to all religions. Not at all. He’s happy to recommend the Christian Peoples Alliance website MegaMosqueNoThanks.com as “full of links and ideas for opposing the mosque”.

The Freethinker, 2 December 2007

MCB finally embraces ‘British values’

The Muslim’s Council of Britain’s uncompromising backing for Gillian Gibbons has rather thrown Islamophobes. How to register grudging support for the MCB’s stand while at the same time maintaining the implication that they are at heart dangerous extremists? Jasper Gerard finds the appropriate tone: “Could a row over a teddy have finally convinced them that the values of their homeland – Britain – are more sympathetic than a violent interpretation of Islam?”

Observer, 2 December 2007

‘No, I am not a racist’ claims Amis

Martin Amis (2)Martin Amis responds indignantly to Ronan Bennett: “I DO NOT ‘ADVOCATE’ ANY DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT OF MUSLIMS. AND I NEVER HAVE. And no one with the slightest respect for truth can claim otherwise.”

Sure, Martin, sure. When you said that stuff in the interview with Ginny Dougary (“The Muslim community will have to suffer until it gets its house in order. What sort of suffering? Not letting them travel. Deportation – further down the road. Curtailing of freedoms. Strip-searching people who look like they’re from the Middle East or from Pakistan. Discriminatory stuff, until it hurts the whole community”) you were merely “adumbrating”, engaging in a “thought experiment”.

Mart goes on to claim that his hostility is solely towards Islamism as an ideology (needless to say, he equates Islamism with terrorism) and that his words in the Dougary interview were “not racist but simply retaliatory”. Which makes it difficult to explain his proposal for “strip-searching people who look like they’re from the Middle East or from Pakistan”.

And how would Amis characterise this statement from the interview? “They’re also gaining on us demographically at a huge rate. A quarter of humanity now and by 2025 they’ll be a third. Italy’s down to 1.1 child per woman. We’re just going to be outnumbered.” As Terry Eagleton pointed out, this is almost indistinguishable from the sort of paranoid fantasies you expect from the BNP.

Guardian, 1 December 2007