‘Police covered up violent campaign to turn London area Islamic’

Undeterred by the fact that his shoddy journalism recently led to his employers apologising to the East London Mosque and removing his inaccurate report from their website, Andrew Gilligan returns to promoting his fantasy about the “Islamification” of Tower Hamlets in today’s Sunday Telegraph.

Predictably, this latest episode in Gilligan’s witch-hunt has been taken up by the EDL:

EDL Andrew Gilligan

Here are some of the comments from EDL supporters that the article has inspired. Gilligan must be really proud of himself.

EDL comments on Gilligan's Telegraph article

Homophobia in Tower Hamlets: how a small group of bigots are trying to stitch up the East London Mosque

The statement by a group of LGBT activists reported yesterday by the GuardianPink News and the East London Advertiser draws attention to the worrying rise in homophobic crimes in Tower Hamlets, which increased by 21%, from 67 to 81, during the year up to April. But the statement fails to mention that this phenomenon is to be found across many London boroughs and that Tower Hamlets is by no means the worst example.

Indeed, when the Pink Paper reported last month on increases in homophobic crime revealed by the latest Metropolitan Police statistics, Tower Hamlets didn’t even rate a mention:

“Homophobic attacks in London’s Soho and the gay-friendly borough of Westminster increased last year, according to the Met Police. New figures released by Scotland Yard revealed that anti-gay hate crime increased by 26 per cent, from 117 to 148 incidents, from April 2010 to April 2011…. The borough of Harrow suffered the biggest increase in assaults, with crimes soaring by 125 per cent. Likewise, Islington saw a significant jump with incidents rising from 82 to 131, a surge of 60 per cent. The boroughs of Havering, Kingston-upon-Thames and Enfield weren’t dissimilar, joining Westminster as some of the worst offenders in the Greater London area.”

Continue reading

Muslims, the LGBT community and anti-hatred laws

Homophobic sticker Tower Hamlets2Julie Bindel, Paul Burston and the other signatories to the statement reported in today’s Guardian start from a position of understandable resentment that Mohammed Hasnath, who was convicted last week of posting up “gay free zone” stickers in Tower Hamlets, received such a light sentence, but they wilfully misrepresent the reasons for this.

They write: “There is a strong feeling that homophobia is being covered up, or ignored, in order not to ‘endanger community relations’. The paltry fine issued by the court lends weight to this fear.” The suggestion here is that it would have antagonised Muslims in Tower Hamlets if Hasnath had received a heavier sentence, and that the police and Crown Prosecution Service decided to charge him with a minor offence out of concern for the feelings of the Muslim community. No evidence is offered for either claim, because none exists.

Continue reading

Quilliam calls for Lord Carlile to be appointed counter-terror tsar

Lord CarlileOver at his Independent blog Ben Chu draws our attention to the interesting coincidence that Quilliam and Paul Goodman have simultaneously issued a call for Lord Carlile to be appointed overseer of the Prevent counter-terrorism strategy.

Carlile is a Liberal Democrat, but he is notorious for rejecting his party’s line that defence against the threat of terrorism doesn’t justify attacks on civil liberties. As Chu points out, Carlile has been a vocal critic of the Lib Dems’ opposition to control orders. He has also condemned the European Court of Human Rights for ruling that terror suspects cannot be deported to their country of origin if they face torture there.

Chu observes that “Quilliam’s championing of the peer for the role of counter-terror tsar is not going to change the mind of those Muslims who regard the think tank with suspicion”.

Youth pleads guilty to posting ‘gay free zone’ stickers in East End

Homophobic sticker Tower HamletsThe Telegraph reports that a youth named Mohammed Hasnath has been fined for posting up some of the offensive “gay free zone” stickers that appeared in Tower Hamlets earlier this year.

It is good that a conviction has been secured in connection with that disgraceful campaign, but it would be even better if the police could identify and charge the people who produced the stickers and gave them to Hasnath – as it is they, rather than a naive-sounding 18-year-old, who are the real villains of the piece.

Judging by the Telegraph report Hasnath was convicted under Section 4A of the Public Order Act, which criminalises the display of “any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting” with “intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress”. In his defence Hasnath stated that he was merely expressing his belief that homosexuality is a sin and had not actually threatened anyone – “it doesn’t say that I am going to punish them it just says what God says in the Koran”.

It will be interesting to see if those right-wing – and liberal – commentators who have defended Geert Wilders’ right to free speech will do the same for Mohammed Hasnath. You can bet they almost certainly won’t. Yet, just as members of the LGBT community should be able to go about their lives in Tower Hamlets without suffering abuse and harassment from homophobes, the Muslim community in the Netherlands should equally have the right to live in peace without a far-right politician inciting hatred against them. Freedom of expression is not absolute in either case.

Update:  It turns out that Hasnath wasn’t charged under Section 4A of the Public Order Act but under Section 5, which criminalises the display of “any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby”.

Rainbow Hamlets have issued a press release criticising British Transport Police and the Crown Prosecution Service for not proceeding with a charge under 4A, which is a more serious offence. However, 4A requires the prosecution to prove intent, which is almost impossible to establish. (That is one reason why the law against incitement to religious hatred, which also requires proof of intent, is completely useless.) So, to be fair to the CPS, they drew the not unreasonable conclusion that a prosecution under 4A would be likely to fail.

Award-winning blogger discovers ‘untackled radical Islam’ in London’s East End

EDL Close East London Mosque NowTory blogger Graeme Archer, who was recently awarded the Orwell Blog Prize, has written an unpleasant article for the Daily Telegraph (“The East End villains who thrive behind a veil of multiculturalism”) in which he asserts that the “increasing Islamisation” of London’s East End has led to threats and violence against gay men, women and non-Muslims.

You might have thought the potential for right-wing scaremongering over this particular urban myth had been pretty well exhausted by now, but Archer manages to extract some further poison from the issue, even though we’ve heard most of this before from the likes of Andrew Gilligan or the Daily Mail.

Continue reading

EDL plans confrontation with Muslim community in Tower Hamlets … with help from local Labour MP

Following their protest against “Muslim paedophiles” in Blackpool next Saturday, the English Defence League have announced that their next demonstration will be in the London borough of Tower Hamlets, which they describe as “the heartland of Islamic terrorism” (see here and here).

Comments about the Tower Hamlets protest on the EDL’s Facebook page have included a call to rip off Muslim women’s veils – from an individual currently on bail over charges arising from an attack on Kingston mosque – and even more explicit threats of violence such as this:

EDL threat to Tower Hamlets

Continue reading

Mail gives more free publicity to irrelevant nutter

The Daily Mail continues its campaign to boost the profile of Anjem Choudary’s tiny group of supporters and provide ammunition for far-right racists like the EDL. The latest report is headlined: “The Bin Laden backlash: Angry Muslims demonstrate outside Downing Street as Obama visits Britain.”

The original version of the report began: “Today a handful of protesters from Muslims Against Crusades demonstrated outside 10 Downing Street in London during Barack Obama’s visit.”

But that obviously wasn’t good enough for the Mail‘s editor. The amended version now begins: “Muslim activists descended on Downing Street today in protest at Barack Obama’s state visit to London.”

And the report has been beefed up with a collection of photos that have been carefully cropped to avoid revealing how few MAC supporters actually participated in the Downing Street protest.

(For another recent example of the right-wing press’s irresponsible coverage of Choudary and MAC, see ENGAGE.)

Update:  The Mail‘s report has been reproduced on mad Pamela Geller’s Atlas Shrugs blog. This the sort of vile anti-Muslim propaganda that the UK media’s promotion of Anjem Choudary is assisting.

Organiser of EDL mosque protest: ‘we are not racist, we are not right winged and we are not hooligans’

EDL Shotton protest May 2011More than 100 members of the English Defence League marched through Shotton on Saturday to protest against attempts to convert a former social club into an Islamic cultural centre. Shotton Lane Social Club, which was destroyed by a suspicious fire in February, had been earmarked as a potential site for a new multi-cultural centre by Flintshire Muslim Cultural Society.

The march was organised by EDL Deeside division member Graeme England to oppose what the group describes as “militant Islam”. Protestors met outside The Clwyd pub and marched to the site of the former social club, where speeches were made.

The group, which refers to itself as a “human rights organisation”, first marched through Shotton in protest against the planned cultural centre in January – just weeks before the social club site was torched in a suspected arson attack. No one has ever been caught in relation to the incident.

On Saturday an anti-EDL event was also held at Connah’s Quay Civic Hall, organised by the Deeside Trades Council.

Flintshire Chronicle, 23 May 2011


See also “Hain slates nationalist march against Muslim culture centre bid site as ‘poison'”, Wales Online, 22 May 2011

Expose draws our attention to a post on the Flintshire Chronicle discussion forum by Graeme England, the organiser of the EDL protest, who insists that “we are not racist, we are not right winged and we are not hooligans”.

England then goes on to assert that “Islam hates the western world and our way of life, Sharia law is already starting to infect our society, its happening because nobody will stand up and say NO!!! there are streets in our country where no non muslim would dare to walk…. i have spoken to many muslims in the country and they all say the same ‘ITS NOT YOUR COUNTRY ANYMORE… ITS OURS!’.” But then, don’t you see, “Islam isnt a race its a religion”. So how can inciting hatred against Muslims be racist?

As for not being “right winged”, the EDL’s leaders are former BNP members while their PA backs the British First Party, an openly neo-Nazi organisation. And Graeme England himself was happy to announce that the Shotton demonstration was supported by the North West Infidels, a group who make no attempt to conceal their links with organised fascism.

And to describe the EDL as mere “hooligans” errs on the side of mildness. The EDL Casuals United blog followed up the latest march in Shotton by celebrating the arson attack on the social club that was to serve as the premises of the new mosque.

In short, the EDL is a far-right racist organisation that doesn’t just engage in hooliganism but openly promotes violence. This only serves to reinforce the view that there is indeed a two-tier legal system in this country – because, if a Muslim group behaved in the way the EDL does, it would have been banned long ago.

Göteborg: anti-mosque protestors outnumbered by counter-demonstrators

Goteborg anti-mosque protestors
National Democrat protestors make up for lack of numbers with lots of flags

Hundreds of proponents and opponents held rallies in Sweden’s second-largest city Goteborg on Saturday to voice their opinions over the building of a mosque there.

Heavy police presence kept the two groups appart and a spokesman for the force said only one person had been arrested for violent behaviour toward an officer. It was the biggest police effort in the city since the EU Summit in 2001, when several thousand people gathered to protest against U.S. President George W. Bush, the EU and globalization.

Mosque opponents claim the construction will ruin a nearby park and that the area is not suitable, while supporters say the opposition is racist. The mosque – which will be the city’s second – is due to be completed in mid-June.

Associated Press, 21 May 2011


The anti-mosque demonstration involved the National Democrats and the Swedish Defence League – the sister organisation of the EDL, who sent a delegation. But the National Democrats reportedly refused to co-operate with the SDL who they regard as pro-Zionist.

The National Democrats, who split from the far-right Sweden Democrats in 2001 because they opposed the party toning down its racist rhetoric in the interests of electability, distributed a leaflet headed “Warning! Sweden is occupied by a foreign power!” which claimed Islam was responsible for suicide terror attacks, rape gangs, child marriages and robbing pensioners.

The counter-protest was organised by Göteborg Against Racism and the Left Party. About a hundred people joined the anti-mosque protest and they were met by 700 counter-demonstrators, according to police figures, though the organisers put the figure at over 2,000.

SDL and EDL