MAB: No to Clarke’s house arrest plans

MAB logoThe Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) strongly opposes the plans Home Secretary Charles Clarke intends to announce today to place certain individuals suspected of terrorism under house arrest. The measures are aimed at saving the face of the government and delivering it out of a predicament caused by illegally detaining suspects without trial for prolonged periods of time.

MAB believes that those suspected of offences should be brought before a court of law. If the eleven suspects held at Belmarsh prison cannot be tried in a court of law for lack of evidence then they are innocent until proven otherwise and should not be punished by incarcerating them in any way.

Ahmed Al-Shiekh, President of MAB commented today: “The idea of putting suspects under house arrest while no evidence has been brought against them is simply a violation of a basic value of democracy and a serious encroachment on their human rights. “If adopted, these measures will constitute a dangerous precedent. They will grant powers to the executive at the expense of the judiciary and will therefore compromise the carriage of justice. “MAB calls for the immediate release of every detainee suspected of terrorism so long as the government has no sufficient evidence to try him before a court of law”.

As the election is approaching MAB intends to call on the public to consider this issue, which is an issue of civil liberties and human rights, to be a priority according to which candidates are assessed for eligibility. Therefore, sitting members of parliament are urged to oppose the proposed plans and deny the government the opportunity to undermine the rule of law and the role of the judiciary.

MAB press release, 22 February 2005

‘Qaradawi calls for Jews to be killed’

“He is rabidly Judeophobic. His sermons regularly call for Jews to be killed, along with ‘crusaders’ and ‘infidels’…. He has insisted that all Jews are responsible for Israel’s actions, and on Al Jazeera’s website stated: ‘There is no dialogue between us except by the sword and the rifle’.”

Who was responsible for this attack on Dr al-Qaradawi? Peter Tatchell? Brett Lock? The Alliance for Workers Liberty? The Worker Communist Party of Iran?

No, Daily Mail columnist Melanie Phillips in Front Page Magazine, 21 February 2005

Muslims on ijtihad and sharia

“The survey asked some interesting questions which I haven’t often seen publicly reported before. They asked Muslim respondents whether they believed that ijtihad (interpretation) remains open – a key indicator of one’s attitude towards a more moderate or radical approach to religion: only 3% in Lebanon, 6% in Palestine, 5% in Egypt, 5% in Jordan, and 8% in Syria said that ijtihad was closed. Almost all Muslims surveyed thought that sharia should be a source of legislation, with almost two thirds in Egypt, Jordan and Palestine saying that sharia should be the only source of legislation. This suggests broad-based support for a moderate Islamism, with sharia viewed as mandatory but open to interpretation – essentially the position advocated by Yusuf al Qaradawi.”

The Centre for Strategic Studies at the University of Jordan has just released a major study of Arab public opinion, Abu Aardvark reports.

France’s hijab ban triggers domino effect

A French law banning hijab and religious insignia in state schools, which came into effect last September, has triggered a domino effect, with several ministries seeking to expand its application beyond public schools.

The Health Ministry was the latest to jump on the bandwagon, issuing a written directive on February 2 committing all hospitals to take a “neutral” position in dealing with their patients when it comes to religion. The directive, a copy of which was obtained by IslamOnline.net, provides for concealing any religious symbol in hospitals to protect the secular nature of the staff.

The ministry’s move is a grim reminder of the sacking of a hijab-garbed nurse in 2002 for refusing to take off the headscarf.

Le Figaro Magazine revealed on its Saturday’s edition that the Higher Learning and Labor ministries mull drafting similar laws banning hijab and religious symbols in state-run institutions and universities.

The magazine said that the minister of labor has already entered into talks with relevant French syndicates to ban hijab in public companies and corporations, especially those in direct touch with the lay people. It added that the minister admitted the difficulties of amending the existing labor laws, but said work contracts can include an item obliging female employees to take off their hijab inside the workplace.

The weekly further disclosed that some universities have banned students from wearing religious symbols inside campuses. A binding draft for all universities is being written to ban religious dress codes, according the magazine.

In January, a police station in Paris did not allow a group of veiled women to attend a party thrown for them for being granted French citizenship.

Islam Online, 21 February 2005