Michigan: opponents decry anti-Sharia bill as racist

Rashida Tlaib and Dawud WalidDetroit — Prominent Muslim leaders and others on Tuesday announced their opposition to a bill to ban “foreign laws” in Michigan, calling the measure a racist attack on Islam.

State Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Harvey Santana, D-Detroit, joined activists at a press conference outside Cadillac Place in Midtown to denounce a bill sponsored by Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, to outlaw state courts from implementing foreign laws, including Sharia, or Islamic law.

“I’m appalled as the first Muslim woman serving in the Michigan legislation,” Tlaib said. “This is taking a community and casting suspicion on them … targeting them, and it’s completely wrong. It’s racism at its core.”

Santana said the bill “polarizes people based on fear”. “Dave Agema has a history of making bigoted comments,” Santana said.

Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, attended the event Tuesday and said his group plans to file a lawsuit if the legislation is passed. A House committee has yet to take up the bill.

Darnell White, the interim director of the Detroit Branch NAACP said, “We have too many issues – jobs, (home) foreclosures – to be focused on this”. “This is wrong and we denounced this type of legislation,” White said at Tuesday’s news conference.

Detroit News, 16 August 2011

See also MLive.com, 16 August 2011

Pamela Geller hails the Middle East Media Research Institute

Geller on MEMRI

Over at Atlas Shrugs, Pamela Geller reports: “MEMRI does an excellent report on the sweeping global movement to Islamicize the world and compel all peoples to live under Islamic law – the sharia (the imperialistic goal of Islam).” And she reproduces in its entirety a lengthy analytical study by MEMRI which begins:

“Over recent years, a new phenomenon has emerged among radical Islamist circles: the rise of a global network of groups calling for the total Islamization of Western states and societies via the implementation of shari’a law and the abolition of democratic states and their replacement by Islamic regimes. These groups, which have referred to themselves as the global shari’a movement, strive to globalize ideas and tactics hatched within radical Salafi circles in the U.K.”

And what is this “global network of groups” to which MEMRI thinks it appropriate to devote such an in-depth study? It consists of the minuscule sects inspired by Anjem Choudary! Even MEMRI itself admits: “It would seem that the only group outside Britain with a sizeable presence on the ground is Shariah4belgium.” And the “sizeable presence on the ground” that Choudary’s organisation enjoys in the UK may be gauged by the fact that a recent demonstration in London in support of his ludicrous campaign for Sharia law attracted a mere 50 participants. In other words, the “global network of groups” that MEMRI depicts as representing some sort of serious danger to western democracy is just a fantasy.

But this is par for the course with MEMRI. It is a hardline right-wing Zionist organisation whose purpose is to defend the state of Israel by presenting Islam as a threat to the West and thereby marginalising Muslims – who, of course, overwhelmingly support the Palestinian cause. So popular mainstream figures like Yusuf al-Qaradawi are depicted as dangerous maniacs by MEMRI and irrelevant buffoons like Anjem Choudary are portrayed as representing significant forces within the Muslim community. Much of MEMRI’s “research” is little more than an exercise in fiction. No wonder Geller takes the view that “MEMRI is the most vital source of news from the Middle East. Hands down.”

And this is the organisation that has just been granted $200,000 by the US State Department.

ADL leader poses ‘danger to the fabric of US society’

Abe Foxman ADLOver at the American Thinker the one-time Jihad Watch collaborator Andrew Bostom (he and Robert Spencer have since fallen out) takes issue with Abe Foxman’s recent JTA op ed condemning the spread of Sharia hysteria in the US. According to Bostom:

“Abraham Foxman’s latest uninformed rant, ‘Shout down the Sharia myth makers’, re-affirms his nonpareil status as the most blindly agenda-driven organizational Jewish ‘leader’. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL)’s Foxman sprays defamatory charges – rooted in willful ignorance – against all those legitimately concerned with the ceaseless efforts of mainstream institutional American Islam to insinuate Sharia mores and jurisdiction into US society.”

Bostom’s conclusion? Foxman and his views “pose an unacceptable danger to the fabric of US society”.

Put Babar Ahmad on trial in the UK – sign the petition

Babar Ahmad familyThe family of a terror suspect has launched a fresh petition urging the government to finally give him his day in court.

This month marks seven years since Babar Ahmad, from Fountain Road, Tooting, was imprisoned without trial following an extradition request from the United States.

To mark the unhappy milestone, his family has set up an e-petition calling on the official government website urging them to put him on trial in the UK. They are aiming to get 100,000 signatures to force a parliamentary debate about the case.

Mr Ahmad’s father, Ashfaw Ahmad, said: “This anniversary brings back dreadful memories of that day seven years ago when I received a call from the police telling me that my son had been arrested. Babar – it’s been 7 years but we will not let you be forgotten.”

Babar Ahmad remains in a maximum security prison in Worcestershire where he has become the longest-serving British terror detainee without a formal charge.

An IT technician at Imperial College, London, he was believed to be the leader of a small UK based group providing “logistical support, financial assistance, recruits and computer expertise” for overseas Jihadi groups when he was arrested.

He was later released without charge but was placed back in custody in August, 2004, awaiting extradition to the United States on terror charges. His final appeal against extradition is currently with the European Court of Human Rights, with a judgement expected later this year.

Wandsworth Guardian, 13 August 2011

Sign the petition here

Michigan bill targets Sharia

A state lawmaker wants Michigan to join the trend of states banning “foreign laws”, but Muslim activists say the effort is a thinly veiled attack on Islam.

Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, is pushing a bill to bar the implementation of foreign laws. It doesn’t mention Sharia – Islamic law – but he acknowledged it would be prohibited in courts under the legislation intended to prevent anyone “who tries to shove any foreign law down our throats”.

“No foreign law shall supersede federal laws or constitution or state laws or constitution,” Agema said. “Our law is our law. I don’t like foreign entities telling us what to do.” Agema said his bill would protect the “vast majority” of Muslims, whom he contended “come to this country to get away from Sharia”.

The legislation comes at a time of heightened debate about Sharia, a set of religious rules governing personal conduct, family relationships and religious practice for Muslims. Critics fear Sharia could supersede civil law and have an impact on divorce and child custody cases, and similar legislation has been introduced in 25 states.

Some say the bills are unnecessary and pander to anti-Muslim paranoia. “Agema … is a reflection of a segment of the GOP that is openly xenophobic and Islamophobic,” said Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Michigan chapter.

State Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, plans to speak out about the bill during a press conference Tuesday in Midtown. Victor Begg, a prominent Republican and co-founder of the Council of Islamic Organizations of Michigan, called the bill “appalling”. “Some in our party find it politically opportune to target my faith by sponsoring an innocuous sounding bill, knowing well that their intent is so-called ‘creeping Sharia,'” Begg said.

Agema called the criticism “hogwash”. “If anybody has a problem with this that means they don’t agree with U.S. laws,” he said. “If they don’t want it passed then they have an ulterior agenda.”

Detroit News, 13 August 2011

New York congressional election: Republican candidate resurrects ‘Ground Zero mosque’ controversy to attack Democratic opponent

In a special election to take place just two days after the 10th anniversary of 9/11, the GOP candidate running to fill former Rep. Anthony Weiner’s seat attacked his Democratic opponent for supporting the “Ground Zero mosque” last year.

Republican businessman Bob Turner released a TV ad Thursday, juxtaposing video of the burning World Trade Center with images of President Barack Obama. Turner blasted his opponent, Democrat David Weprin, for siding with the president on the issue.

“It’s been ten short years. Everyone remembers,” the ad says, with dreary music playing over images of smoke billowing from the World Trade Center. “Some, though, want to commemorate the tragedy by building a mosque on Ground Zero.”

The ad then says the president “thinks it’s a good idea,” as a photo of a smiling Obama appears next to a photo of a mosque, as well as video of the Twin Towers on 9/11. “And so does Congressional candidate David Weprin,” the ad says.

The ad then plays a soundbite of Weprin saying in a 2010 debate that he supported those who wanted to build the Cordoba House, an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from Ground Zero. Protests over the project spilled over into a national controversy last summer. “But Bob Turner says ‘no’,” the ad says. “He knows Weprin and Obama are wrong.”

CNN, 12 August 2011

Needless to say, Bob Turner enjoys the enthusiastic backing of mad Pamela Geller:

“Turner is going to need our help. And I like what he is saying. Gutsy! … Bob Turner opposes the Ground Zero mosquestrosity. It takes courage to take this stand publicly, although the overwhelming majority of Americans oppose this cultural obscenity…. We must support candidates who have the poltical [sic] will to stand up for America and against the leftist/Islamic machine.”

US taxpayers to fund MEMRI

Yes, really. The US State Department has awarded a $200,000 grant to the right-wing Zionist propaganda organisation the Middle East Media Research Institute. What were they thinking? Even leaving aside its reputation for attacking Muslim critics of Israel, and the inspiration this provided for Anders Breivik, MEMRI notoriously intervened in the 2004 US presidential election with the baseless claim that Osama bin Laden was supporting the Democrats’ campaign by offering to refrain from attacking US states that voted for Kerry rather than Bush.

See Jim Lobe and Philip Weiss. Also Ali Gharib at Think Progress.

CAIR defends prayer rights of Muslim employees

The Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-MN) today announced that more than a dozen Muslim employees it represented have won a favorable ruling by the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EEOC) in a complaint filed against H.J. Heinz Company subsidiary, Dianne’s Gourmet Desserts, in Le Center, Minn. CAIR-MN said the employees received a “reasonable cause” determination from the EEOC on all allegations of discrimination, including failure to accommodate religious practices and retaliation.

In December 2010, Muslim employees at the Heinz subsidiary were terminated from their jobs for requesting legally protected prayer accommodation. They were forcibly removed and local law enforcement was called to ensure they left the premises. The company had created a new policy that abolished a break time used by Muslim employees to pray their evening (Maghrib) prayer. The employees were prohibited from praying outside of the newly implemented work breaks, which did not coincide with prayer times. Performance of the five daily prayers is a mandatory and essential part of life for Muslims.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Minnesota Human Rights Act prohibit employers from discriminating against employees or prospective employees on the basis of religion. Title VII also requires employers to reasonably accommodate the religious practices of their employees. Courts have been clear in articulating that each individual employee who has a bona fide religious belief must be reasonably accommodated by an employer.

CAIR-MN negotiated with Dianne’s Gourmet Desserts to rehire the employees in January 2011, however the issue of discrimination still prevailed and was investigated by the EEOC. CAIR-MN will be entering in the settlement phase with Dianne’s Gourmet Desserts to remedy their illegal acts. “Employers need to understand their legal obligation to accommodate bona fide religious practices in the workplace for all employees,” said CAIR-MN Civil Rights Director Taneeza Islam. “We thank the EEOC for its diligent investigation and commitment in mandating religious accommodation on employers.”

CAIR press release, 10 August 2011

Minneapolis man pleads guilty to hate crime in assault on Somali man

George ThompsonA 64-year-old man pleaded guilty Wednesday to violating the civil rights of an 83-year-old Somali man he assaulted in Minneapolis last year while yelling that he was a Muslim and should go back to Africa.

George Thompson, of Minneapolis, appeared before U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson in federal court today in St. Paul.

Thompson, a former employee of the Transportation Security Administration, was charged under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Protection Act, passed in 2009. Shepard was tortured and murdered in Wyoming by two men who believed he was gay; Byrd, a black man, was dragged to his death behind a truck by three men in Texas.

Court papers said Thompson attacked his victim on May 4, 2010, because of the man’s “actual and perceived religion and national origin.”

Continue reading