Muslim in final appeal to stop extradition to US

Ashfaq AhmadLawyers acting for Babar Ahmad are making a final appeal to the European Court of Human Rights to prevent the computer expert from London’s prestigious Imperial College being extradited to the US for allegedly running terrorist websites.

A decision on the case is expected to be made Thursday after Britain’s highest judicial authorities, the House of Lords, refused permission to appeal at the weekend.

“After three years of imprisonment without charge, Babar is being sent to face a flawed justice system in the United States,” said his family, who live in Tooting, south London. They said that his supporters from all over the UK will “hold the British Government responsible if he is subjected to any physical or psychological abuse.”

Law Lords rejected Babar’s appeal on Sunday when concluding that two points of law presented to them were not matters of “public importance”. But his family said that the refusal was a “complete travesty of justice”. The Attorney General and the Crown Prosecution Service had confirmed in writing several times that there is “insufficient evidence to charge Babar with any crime,” they said.

Muslim News, 13 June 2007

State-sanctioned Islam?

“One of the current Prime Minister’s potential legacies is an Islamic studies curriculum in British universities which is shaped by his own personal vision (report, June 5). It is not clear how Mr Blair has acquired the ability to distinguish authentic from inauthentic Muslim belief. Most Muslim theologians, past and present, have sensibly accepted that such judgments can ultimately be known by Allah and no one else. However, armed with this ability to discern true faith, Mr Blair’s Government appears to want to refashion the teaching of Islamic studies in British higher education….

“It seems that Islamicists now have a responsibility to encourage a government-approved version of Islam, and discourage dangerous expressions of the faith. The report by Dr Ataullah Siddiqui, commissioned by the Department for Education, contains a number of interesting suggestions for improving Islamic studies in the UK, but Dr Siddiqui himself would surely be uneasy at the prospect of higher education being used for political ends.”

Letter from Professor Robert Gleave, Times, 12 June 2007

Posted in UK

Pat Robertson: Islam is not a religion

Pat RobertsonOn the June 12 edition of the Christian Broadcasting Network’s The 700 Club, following a report on Muslims in Minneapolis seeking religious accommodations at school and work, host Pat Robertson stated, “Ladies and gentlemen, we have to recognize that Islam is not a religion. It is a worldwide political movement meant [sic] on domination of the world. And it is meant to subjugate all people under Islamic law.”

He characterized the American Muslim community as “Islam light” and went on to say Muslims “want to take over and we want to impose Sharia on you. And before long, ladies are going to be dressed in burqas and whatever garments they would put on them, and next thing you know, men are going to be allowed to have wife-beating and you’ll be beheading adulterers and so on and so forth.”

Media Matters, 12 June 2007

Mad Mel on ‘honour killings’

The loathsome Melanie Phillips takes advantage of the tragic death of Banaz Mahmod to engage in yet more baiting of Muslims:

“The elephant in the room here – as so often – is that ‘honour killings’ are largely a Muslim phenomenon…. honour killings, the need to avenge the shame caused by a loss of honour, are rooted in values intrinsic to the way of life of many Muslims…. Much hot air is expended on how to integrate British Muslims into British society. But look what happens when the women try to do just that. Some of them end up murdered…. It’s quite simple. Integration can lead to murder because of the concepts of honour and shame embedded in Muslim culture…. Britain’s multicultural orthodoxy does not protect women like Banaz Mahmod. It signs their death warrant.”

Melanie Phillips’s Diary, 12 June 2007

Cf. the Times, 13 June 2007

Cardinal calls on Muslims to fight for freedom

Cormac Murphy O'Connor (2)Britain’s most senior Roman Catholic leader has called on Muslims to join forces with the Church to fight for “genuine religious freedom”.

Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, the head of the Church in England and Wales, said that since the September 11 terrorist attacks on America, public opinion had become suspicious of religion in general and of Islam in particular. It was now necessary, he said, for the followers of the two faiths to unite to uphold religious freedom as a “natural right of every human being to be respected by every government”.

The Cardinal said that the problem of Islamist terrorism had “created an atmosphere where ordinary Muslims feel very uncomfortable and unfairly singled out by people who often seem not to understand them at all”. The “spotlight has been firmly locked on to Islam”, he said, adding that as a result Muslims often felt “misrepresented or at least misunderstood by our media and in public opinion”.

He said that although British authorities tended to treat religious communities with respect it was a difficult time for those involved in governing and policing society. Muslims and Christians together had to fight against those who wished to “make sure religion had no public voice”, the cardinal said.

“The space for dialogue between our religions and our culture has to be a public one,” he added. “In other words, religious communities need to be able to operate with a certain degree of autonomy. If politicians at national or local level – or even academics, for that matter – think they know what is best for religions, they will not act in our best interests, and could well be tempted to try to manipulate the ways we contribute to society.”

Daily Telegraph, 12 June 2007

Fascist blogger resists Islamification of London

The MPACUK website has reproduced the article “Is London’s future Islamic?” from the listings magazine Time Out. This fantasy doesn’t find favour with a fascist blogger who, apparently under the impression that the article originates with MPAC itself and represents their plans for the Muslim conquest of London, assures his readers that the Islamic hordes will be driven back: “If these Death Eaters think they can take Our Land without a fight from the BNP, then they are in for a shock. The British National Party will obtain the mandate of the people and they will restore Our Capitol [sic] to its rightful owners. The True British.”

Home of the Green Arrow, 12 June 2007

Is that so, Mr Blair?

Politics After BlairIs that so, Mr Blair?

By Salma Yaqoob

Morning Star, 11 June 2007

EARLY last week, Tony Blair made his latest and, hopefully, last foray into Muslim affairs as Prime Minister.

In a speech in Cambridge to a carefully selected audience that excluded representatives from the leading Muslim organisations, Blair said that he wanted the “voice of moderation” among Muslims to be heard.

It is difficult not to be cynical about the Prime Minister’s motives. In light of the rivers of blood which he has helped unleash in Iraq and Afghanistan, Blair’s lectures on tackling extremism ring hollow.

While Muslim leaders are constantly berated for “not doing enough” to tackle the appeal of Islamic extremism, our government still refuses to acknowledge the role of its foreign policy in fertilising the ground from which such extremism grows.

This denial of their own culpability for the appeal of religious sectarianism makes more difficult any serious discussion with Muslims on how best to marginalise it.

Instead, Muslims are told, somewhat patronisingly, that we need to achieve a greater understanding of “British values” like democracy, rule of law and equal rights, from a government that wages an illegal war based on lies and is planning the introduction of internment in all but name.

Continue reading

Demonstration over BNP councillor

Corsham anti-BNP protestProtesters have gathered outside Corsham town hall after the appointment of a British National Party councillor.

Michael Simpkins, 47, was handed a place on the town council because nobody else stood for election.

The ex-RAF policeman and now taxi driver said he joined the BNP three years ago as his son was being taught about the Muslim faith at school.

“I don’t want to see this country turned in to an Islamic state. That doesn’t make me racist it just makes me a concerned British citizen.”

BBC News, 11 June 2007

See also “BNP councillor addresses crowd”, Wiltshire Times, 11 June 2007

And “Town vents its fury at BNP councillor”, Gazette & Herald, 11 June 2007

7/7 had nothing to do with foreign policy (it says here)

Prospect June 2007In an “Open letter to Tariq Ramadan” in the current issue of Prospect Magazine David Goodhardt rejects Professor Ramadan’s recent Guardian article as a “grievance-seeking, responsibility-avoiding diatribe”. According to Goodhardt, Muslims in Britain have never had it so good:

“Is there some discrimination, racism even? Yes, but there is far less than in the past and less than most other countries in the world…. The ideology of Islamophobia is a mixture of exaggeration (see Kenan Malik’s work on this subject) and a sort of perverted utopianism that interprets the initial suspicion (and sometimes even hostility) towards strangers found in all cultures as proof of deep hatred of a particular religion.”

Goodhardt refers Professor Ramadan to the cover story in the current issue of Prospect Magazine, a study of 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan by Shiv Malik which draws the following conclusion: “Khan may have felt indignant about western foreign policy, as many anti-war campaigners do, but that wasn’t the reason he led a cell of young men to kill themselves and 52 London commuters.” But his lengthy article provides no evidence to back up Malik’s claim.

As is well known, Khan “martyrdom video” contains a clear statement of the reasoning behind the 7/7 bombings:

“Your democratically elected governments continuously perpetuate atrocities against my people all over the world. And your support of them makes you directly responsible, just as I am directly responsible for protecting and avenging my Muslim brothers and sisters. Until we feel security, you will be our targets. And until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture of my people we will not stop this fight. We are at war and I am a soldier. Now you too will taste the reality of this situation.”

Malik dismisses this on the grounds that Khan’s video also contains an attack on established religious leaders:

“Our so-called scholars today are content with their Toyotas and semi-detached houses. They seem to think that their responsibilities lie in pleasing the kufr instead of Allah. So they tell us ludicrous things, like you must obey the law of the land. Praise be God! How did we ever conquer lands in the past if we were to obey this law?… By Allah these scholars will be brought to account, and if they fear the British government more than they fear Allah then they must desist in giving talks, lectures and passing fatwas, and they need to sit at home and leave the job to the real men, the true inheritors of the prophets.”

How does this contradict the view that Khan’s murderous violence was motivated by anger against western foreign policy? It does nothing of the sort.