Select committee chair says there is a particular problem with Muslim schools

The Commons children, schools and families select committee will grill the schools secretary, Ed Balls, at a meeting on January 9 about the government’s plans to allow local authorities to open as many faith schools as they want. Members are concerned the plans will damage social cohesion and widen existing divisions.

The committee’s chairman, Barry Sheerman, said: “I am getting reports from people in local government who find it difficult to know what is going on in some faith schools – particularly Muslim schools.”

But Chris Keates, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, warned that the debate over Muslim faith schools risked fuelling Islamophobia. “They need to be very careful how they handle this sensitive issue,” she said.

Guardian, 2 January 2008

See also “MPs’ fears on cash for Muslim schools” in the Daily Express, 2 January 2008.

Barclaycard chief quits over Muslims remark

A leading bank executive has been forced to quit after making an insulting remark about Muslims. Marc Howells, who was one of Barclaycard’s leading figures, left his £200,000-a-year job after making the quip during a staff meeting as he discussed quarterly figures. Colleagues were stunned when he said: “The results were like Muslims – some were good, some were Shi’ite.” Offended members of staff complained to senior bosses about the “wholly inappropriate” comment.

Daily Telegraph, 1 January 2008

Posted in UK

Torygraph promotes Islamic reform

“There are signs that a reform movement may emerge among this country’s two million Muslims, aimed at developing an interpretation of Islam that is compatible with liberal democracy. At present the chief spokesmen for Islam are quick to assume the mantle of victimhood and inclined to condemn all criticism as Islamophobia, a pseudo-psychiatric term implying fear and irrational hostility. But a younger generation is emerging, confident that their faith is a guide to a good life but aware that mainstream Islam embodied in Sharia law needs reform.

“The inequality of women under the law will never be acceptable in the West. The freedom to criticise religious beliefs and to join and leave faith traditions as individual conscience dictates is simply not consistent with the Muslim habit of threatening apostates with death. The view that the Koran must be binding for all time is not compatible with our commitment to learning from each other through free inquiry and the clash of opinion. The year 2008 could see the beginnings of a liberal British Islam willing to embrace equality under the law, freedom of religion, and freedom of interpretation.”

David Green of right-wing think-tank Civitas in the Sunday Telegraph, 30 December 2007


Note the sleight of hand here. Green applauds the development of “an interpretation of Islam that is compatible with liberal democracy” (so you can’t accuse him of being an anti-Muslim bigot, can you?) while simultaneously asserting that mainstream Islam in the UK – which he identifies with the oppression of women, death threats against apostates and a literalist intepretation of the Qur’an – is incompatible with liberal democracy.

But Civitas specialises in this sort of double-talk on Islam. See for example here.

Anger over plan to broadcast Muslim call to prayer in Oxford

Oxford_Central_MosqueMuslim plans to broadcast a loudspeaker call to prayer from a city centre mosque have been attacked by local residents who say it would turn the area into a “Muslim ghetto”. Dozens of people packed out a council meeting to express their concerns over the plans for a two-minute long call to prayer to be issued three times a day, saying that it could drown out the traditional sound of church bells.

Dr Mark Huckster, who lives in Stanton Road and works at East Oxford hospice Helen House, told the Oxford Mail: “The proposal to issue a prayer call is very un-neighbourly, especially in a crowded urban space such as Oxford. I have lived in the Middle East and a prayer call has a very different feel to church bells and I personally found the noise extremely unpleasant, rather disturbing and very alien to the western mindset.”

Daily Mail, 24 December 2007

Continue reading

‘Mosque call outrages Oxford’

Central Mosque Oxford“Muslim leaders have sparked outrage with plans to broadcast the Islamic call to prayer over the roof-tops of one of Britain’s most historic cities. Elders at Oxford Central Mosque want to blast it out three times a day. They have already discussed the controversial idea with council chiefs and are set to submit a formal application in the New Year.

But the move has been met with fury by people living near the mosque in Oxford – known as the city of dreaming spires. They claim the two-minute call – to be broadcast over three large speakers – is noise pollution and offensive to other faiths.”

The Sun – rather belatedly – joins in the Oxford mosque hysteria.

Whose liberation?

“One of the most elusive tasks I have faced at conferences has been a definition of ‘Muslim women’ from which I could lay out the terms of their suffering and, in a true pompous academic fashion, advance some proposals for their liberation. The moment the term ‘Muslim women’ is deconstructed, my argument reaches an impasse. On the other hand, incorporating it into any diatribe against misogyny, oppression and persecution threatens to reduce my argument to one where Islam is the sole culprit. More importantly, the conflation between women and Islam inadvertently lumps together close to 1 billion women from around the globe, a homogenising equation which overlooks many other contextual variables that have shaped the plight of these women.”

Salam Al-Mahadin at Comment is Free, 26 December 2007

‘Cardinal’s sermon on immigration shows his staggering ignorance’

“With dreary predictability, our two leading Christian clerics have each used their Christmas messages this year to mouth fashionable political orthodoxies…. In his sermon yesterday the Archbishop of Canterbury, like an earnest Left-wing activist, prattled on about the threat to the environment from ‘humanity’s selfishness’, warning how our ‘greed’ could ‘distort the balance of things’. His opposite number in the Catholic Church, the Archbishop of Westminster Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor, was even more politically correct. In his address at midnight mass he attacked Britain’s supposed failure to embrace immigration. Urging that we do more to welcome migrants, he moaned that too many arrivals ‘feel excluded simply because they are outsiders’….

“For a leading figure in the Christian Church, this is a bizarre stance because mass immigration represents the greatest threat to the foundations of our Christian civilisation. Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor might blather about Christian compassion to newcomers but our national religion will lose all influence if Britain is turned into nothing more than a landmass of disparate global cultures….

“The consequences of multiculturalism and mass immigration can be seen at their most graphic in the creeping Islamification of Britain. This makes a nonsense of the Cardinal’s bleat about ‘outsiders’ feeling ‘excluded’. There is no community more assertive about its rights or more confident in its beliefs than the British followers of Islam. In contrast to the cultural cringe of the Christian Church, Muslims have no hesitation in demanding acceptance of their customs. All too often the enfeebled British state is willing to oblige. So the Government takes a hard line about objections from the Catholic Church towards gay adoption, yet does nothing about the vile Muslim practice of forced marriages.

“Throughout the country, church bells are being drowned out by the wailing from the mosque. In Oxford an application has recently been submitted from one of the city’s biggest mosques to broadcast the call to prayers at least three times a day. Perhaps the most telling symbol of this Islamification is the plan from the Muslim group Tablighi Jamaat to build a mosque in Newham, East London, with a capacity for 12,000. Costing £100million, this will be the biggest Muslim centre in Europe and largest religious building in Britain.

“Muslim supporters of the project do not seem imbued with a spirit of tolerance. Alan Craig, a councillor who belongs to the Christian Alliance and objects to the plan, has received death threats, with a sick memorial notice posted on the internet. But his opposition is correct, for this mosque would be a monument to Muslim aggression and the destruction of our Christian heritage. If the Cardinal wants a cause worth supporting, it is his own religion, not the import of yet more alien culture into Britain.”

Leo McKinstry in the Daily Express, 26 December 2007

Climate of suspicion

“Perhaps it’s not surprising that someone who describes himself as phobic about the concept of Islamophobia and thinks that the invasion of Iraq is a ‘subject of purely historical interest’ might struggle to grasp why the relentless campaign of hostile media stories about the Muslim community is toxic and dangerous – or recognise that it is driven by a neoconservative agenda about terror and war.”

Seumas Milne replies to Andrew Anthony.

Comment is Free, 24 December 2007

Leyton: mosque hits back after extremism claim

Masjid al-Tawhid 2A report claiming that extremist literature was being distributed through a mosque in Leyton was based on forged evidence, according to the mosque’s imam and the BBC. Masjid al-Tawhid, in Leyton High Road, was named in The Hijacking of British Islam – published by the rightwing Policy Exchange think-tank in October.

Imam Dr Usama Hasan says the researchers bought the books from Tayba, an unaffiliated book shop next door, then faked a receipt to suggest the shop and the mosque were the same organisation. He said: “We’re furious about this and we’re considering taking legal action against Policy Exchange unless they correct their errors. The shop is nothing to do with us. It is an independent commercial enterprise. We never promoted these books at all. We’re involved in interpreting the Quran and understanding it in a modern British context. The only message this mosque promotes is tolerance and co-existence.”

Continue reading