Minister criticises Muslim letter

kim howellsForeign Office minister Kim Howells has criticised Muslim leaders for condemning British foreign policy.

An open letter, signed by three Muslim MPs, three peers and 38 community groups, said the stance on the Middle East has put civilians at risk. They went on to say that UK policy has given “ammunition to extremists”.

But Mr Howells denied there was a “rational connection”. He told BBC News 24 the letter’s comments were “facile”.

BBC News, 12 August 2006

Over at Jihad Watch, Robert Spencer applauds this “refreshing anti-dhimmitude from the UK”.

Dhimmi Watch, 12 August 2006

Burchill attacks ‘Masochist Hacks For Mohammed’ who like ‘big swarthy men with tea-towels on their heads’

BurchillJulie Burchill analyses UK media coverage of the Lebanon war for the benefit of Israeli readers:

“One of the most grotesque examples of the almost brainwashed level of bias can be seen on the official BBC Religions Web site, where that ‘peace be upon him’ eyewash is going on like crazy, while other religions are coolly commented on in a strictly ‘objective’ way.

“The conflict has sent this tendency into overdrive, with not just the usual Masochist Hacks For Mohammed such as Robert Fisk (beaten up by Islamists, says they were right to do it) and Yvonne Ridley (kidnapped by Islamists, then became one) getting their chadors in a twist about big swarthy men with tea-towels on their heads treating the West mean and keeping it – in their case at least – keen.

“Even the women’s magazines have gotten in on the act, with lots of first-person eye-witness accounts of British citizens fleeing the Jewish jackboot. Then turn the page and you’ll often find a shocked article about honor-killing or forced marriage, Muslim-style. That Israel is fighting the frontline war, on behalf of the freedom and civilization of all of us, against the very real evils of shari’a law never seems to occur to these bleeding-heart ignoramuses.”

Ha’aretz, 11 August 2006

Torygraph backs Bright, attacks MCB

Meanwhile a Telegraph editorial takes the opportunity to blame “Muslim families” for not preventing terrorism and have a go at the MCB:

“In truth, there is no such thing as a single ‘Muslim community’. The Muslim Council of Britain is held by the Government to be the authentic voice of this frequently disparate group, which hails originally from at least a dozen different countries. But is it? A trenchant analysis – When Progressives Treat With Reactionaries – written by Martin Bright, the political editor of the Left-wing New Statesman, concludes: ‘The Government has chosen as its favoured partner an organisation that is undemocratic, divisive and unrepresentative of the full diversity of Muslim Britain.’ Too frequently, its leaders depict as mainstream what most people would describe as extreme. Its stand against terrorism has been muted.”

Daily Telegraph, 11 August 2006

Terrorism due to testosterone and nihilism not foreign policy, Times explains

“Islam has an identity crisis that it must combat. A virulent strain that mixes testosterone and a nihilistic theology has afflicted a small minority of young Muslims.

“There will also be critics and cynics who are not Muslim, who would like to believe that if only foreign policy would change, the threat would immediately recede and the extremism evaporate. Those who would commit mass murder are not to be appeased by this or that policy fluctuation. Jihadists see Western society as innately evil, an existential threat to their puritanical, obscurantist version of Islam. They cannot come to terms with sexual equality, Western values, tolerance or democracy. To them, the Palestinian or Iraqi contexts are only settings for the introduction of an ideology that is utterly intolerant and regards moderate Muslims as apostates. If policy on either changed, they would look for other justifications for their fanaticism.”

Times, 11 August 2006

‘Britain a soft target for Islamists’

“Britain, like much of Europe, has discarded the anchors that held society in place and enabled it to endure in times of uncertainty. Churches are being turned into mosques…. Britain has made a virtue of its post-colonial guilt and its own loss of values by embracing multiculturalism, a fuzzy notion which holds that all cultures, all standards, all values are of equal merit. Into this morass of uncertainty step the young Muslims, certain of their belief and confident in their identity. Like the stranded passengers at London’s airports, wandering around glassy eyed and lost, Britain has become a soft target for these new Islamists. They know exactly who they are and where they are going.”

Douglas Davis explains the background to the alleged terrorist plot.

National Post, 11 August 2006

Terrorism due to ‘leftist radicalism and appeasement’

“By Thursday morning security forces had arrested some 21 suspects. All are British citizens. All are Muslims. It is not a stretch of the imagination to assume that these British Muslims are jihadists. Indeed, it can probably be assumed that, like their predecessors last July 7, they made their decision to commit an unspeakable atrocity against their countrymen to advance Islam’s takeover of Britain….

“… why is the jihad picking up steam now? Why are fanatical Muslims on the march this summer? It would seem that the answer to this question is found in the increased cultural weakness of the two states leading the war against radical Islam: the US and Britain. In both countries, for the past two years, the forces of leftist radicalism and appeasement have been on the rise.”

Caroline Glick in the Jerusalem Post, 11 August 2006

CAIR on LGF

Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a civil rights organization often vilified on Johnson’s blog, calls Little Green Footballs “a vicious, anti-Muslim hate site … that has unfortunately become popular.” The irony, Hooper says, is that if the same kind of “hatred” that appears on LGF appeared on Muslim sites, it soon would be used by LGF’s fans to justify their worldview.

Like many politically themed blogs, Little Green Footballs doesn’t always traffic in subtlety and nuance. Dissenting points of view often are dismissed as “idiotarian” or “LLL” (for “loony liberal left”), and Islam is mockingly referred to as “RoP,” meaning “religion of peace.”

Hooper says the Reuters incident is unfortunate in itself, but says such sites as Little Green Footballs use such lapses “as a club against the entire mainstream media. Their line is basically that if one freelance photographer alters a photo, then everything Israel does must be justified. Or if one of the sentences that Dan Rather once uttered wasn’t correct, then the media is corrupt and Dan Rather’s whole career is rotten to the core.”

The FBI, according to Hooper, recently investigated several threats of physical harm against Muslims posted by Little Green Footballs readers.

Washington Post, 9 August 2006

‘If they hate us so much, why don’t they leave?’

richard liittlejohnRichard Littlejohn replies to Tarique Ghaffur:

“Mr Ghaffur’s speech coincided with the publication of a new survey which claims almost a quarter of British Muslims believe that the July 7 bombings were justified because of the Government’s support for the war on terror. The most hardline views came from young Muslims under the age of 24 who have grown up in Britain.

“A third of Muslims think Britain has become so morally reprehensible that they would rather live under Sharia law and dream of this country becoming an Islamic state. Plenty of non-Muslims have reached the same conclusion about the state of morals in this country. But they confine themselves to writing angry letters to the Daily Mail or moving to Spain. They don’t believe the answer is to turn Britain into a 7th-century theocracy, where women are second-class citizens and homosexuals are put to death….

“Young Muslims … have been told constantly by their self-appointed leaders and their imams that they are oppressed by widespread ‘Islamophobia’. They are encouraged to put loyalty to their faith above responsibility to their country of birth. They are brainwashed into treating any misfortune which befalls any Muslim anywhere in the world as a personal insult.

“Makeshift mosques in run-down backstreets and demented jihadist websites pump out hatred of the West, which is blamed for all the problems in the Muslim universe. Fanatics are allowed to march through the streets preaching death to the infidel, death to Jews, death to just about anyone. For a peaceful religion, they’re very big on death. This is all coming from within the Muslim community, not from without. Is it any wonder that some of this constant ideological bombardment rubs off? We don’t need a judicial inquiry to tell us any of this.

“The majority of Muslims in Britain make a valuable contribution and want to live a quiet life, just like the rest of us. But, as this survey illustrates, a sizeable minority don’t. They have no desire to adapt to Britain. They want Britain to adapt to them. For a large number of Muslims, their faith is incompatible with Western freedoms and democracy.

“No one is forced to remain here. As discussed in this column recently, hundreds of thousands of British citizens decide to emigrate every year.

“If there are people who hate this country so much they think mass murder of civilians on our streets is justified and they would rather live in a fundamentalist Islamic state, all the judicial reviews in the world are not going to change their minds. If we promise not to profile them at the airport, they should leave – and take their ‘anger and resentment’ with them.”

Daily Mail, 8 August 2006

Pipes on ‘Sudden Jihad Syndrome’

“Mr Haq’s actions are a clear instance of ‘Sudden Jihad Syndrome’, whereby normal-appearing Muslims unpredictably become violent. His attack confirms my oft-repeated call for special scrutiny of Muslims. Because the identity of the next homicidal jihadi cannot be anticipated, Muslims generally need to come under heightened observation.”

Daniel Pipes draws the lessons from the July 28 shooting at the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle.

New York Sun, 8 August 2006

Update:  For Yusuf Smith’s comments, see Indigo Jo Blogs, 10 August 2006