‘Suicide bomb backer runs Ken’s campaign’

“An advocate of suicide bombing is among leaders of a group trying to mobilise Muslim voters to back Ken Livingstone, the Standard reveals today. For the past year, the group has been working on a strategy to win an estimated 200,000 Muslim votes in an effort to re-elect the Mayor. It includes a campaign of vilification aimed at his Conservative rival, Boris Johnson. It is being waged by Muslims 4 Ken, led by 39-year-old lecturer Anas Altikriti and Palestinian-born Azzam Tamimi, a supporter of Hamas, the militant group dedicated to the creation of an Islamic state of Palestine.”

Evening Standard, 16 April 2008

See also “Embracing Islam gives Ken new election hope” and “Ken’s friends“.

Read the response by the British Muslim Initiative and Muslims 4 Ken here and here.

And see also the statement by Liberal Democrat mayoral candidate Brian Paddick: “We have seen in the past how Ken Livingstone has invited the likes of Yusuf al-Qaradawi to City Hall, someone who holds abhorrent views, including treating women as second class citizens, the murdering of gay people and hatred towards Jews.”

Readers might also like to check out Tim Sebastian’s interview with Dr Tamimi which formed the basis of the Standard‘s headline (transcript here). Sebastian hectored, interrupted and badgered Tamimi throughout this long interview, basically accusing him of cowardice because he wouldn’t go to Palestine and become a suicide bomber himself. Eventually, Tamimi was provoked into making the remarks quoted by the Standard, which have been used against him ever since.

In clarification of his views, Tamimi later stated: “I said if I were to be put in the same circumstances that the Palestinians are put in, I might resort to doing that.” This may not be exactly what Tamimi said under the pressure of Sebastian’s harassment, but it’s the position he actually holds.

Update:  See also Anas Altikriti at Comment is Free, 17 April 2008

Why the BNP backs Boris

Spectator Muslims are Coming“When confronted about his infamous choice of language to describe black people – ‘piccaninnies’ with ‘watermelon smiles’ – Boris Johnson’s responses ranged from claims of being misinterpreted to apologies for the offence caused. And when, a few days ago, Nick Ferrari questioned him on his no less distasteful statements on Islam, the Conservative candidate for the London mayoralty denied ever making them. He insisted that Ken Livingstone, the mayoral incumbent and his fellow guest on the breakfast show, was seeking to smear him. Islam, he emphatically declared, was ‘a religion of peace’.

“What a difference a mayoral race can make. Only two years ago, Johnson’s writings – readily available in the online archives of the Spectator and Daily Telegraph – were peppered with talk of the ‘paranoia of the Muslim mind’, of Islam’s ‘medievalism’, ‘heartlessness’ and ‘disgusting arrogance’. Islamophobia was, he maintained, ‘a natural reaction’ to ‘any non-Muslim reader of the Qur’an’. We must, therefore, dispose of the ‘first taboo’, he counselled, and accept ‘that the problem is Islam. Islam is the problem’….

“Given Johnson’s record on minorities, his endorsement by the far right as a second-preference candidate seems understandable, shocking though it may be. This signifies a worrying precedent in the history of the BNP – notwithstanding Johnson’s claim that he has no wish ‘to receive a single second-preference vote from a BNP supporter’. Never before has the BNP felt sufficiently fond of a mainstream mayoral candidate to lend him or her its support.”

Soumaya Ghannoushi in the Guardian, 16 April 2008

It might be added that during his tenure as editor of the Spectator Boris Johnson repeatedly published anti-Muslim articles by the likes of Rod LiddleAnthony Browne, Patrick Sookhdeo and Mark Steyn.

Read Johnson’s views on Islam here.

Europe or Eurabia?

Pipes 9-11Daniel Pipes poses the question. His conclusion:

“… indigenous Europeans could yet rediscover their Christian faith, make more babies and again cherish their heritage. Yes, they could encourage non-Muslim immigration and acculturate Muslims already living in Europe. Yes, Muslims could accept historic Europe. But not only are such developments not under way, their prospects are dim. In particular, young Muslims are cultivating grievances and nursing ambitions at odds with their neighbours.

“One can virtually dismiss from consideration the prospect of Muslims accepting historic Europe and integrating within it. American columnist Dennis Prager agrees: ‘It is difficult to imagine any other future scenario for western Europe than its becoming Islamicised or having a civil war.’ But which of those two remaining paths will the continent take? Forecasting is difficult because the crisis has not yet struck. But it may not be far off. Within a decade, perhaps, the continent’s evolution will become clear as the Europe-Muslim relationship takes shape.”

The Australian, 15 April 2008


See also Pipes’ article in the Jerusalem Post, where he tells us that “Islamism represents the world’s leading anti-democratic force” and that Yusuf al-Qaradawi, one of the Muslim world’s leading advocates of representative democracy, “argues that elections are heretical”.

SNP courting ‘radical Muslims’

Osama Saeed (4)“Osama Saeed, who has openly called for ‘a caliphate’, a pan-Islamic global state, has a serious chance of being elected for Glasgow Central when the failing Brown government finally calls a general election. Salmond doesn’t seem to care about the harm being done to the Muslim community by elevating someone such as Saeed, who last week was appointed to be a member of the Scottish government’s working group to look at the issue of Trident replacement.”

Tom Gallagher renews his campaign against the Scottish National Party and one of its leading Muslim activists.

Sunday Times, 13 April 2008

Update:  See also Postman Patel, 15 April 2008

He draws attention to the fact that Gallagher is a research fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy in Washington.

‘Jails go soft on Muslim perverts’

The Daily Star has a perfect storm of scare stories: sex offenders and Muslims.

In the latest instalment of The State Goes Soft On Muslims stories from the Richard Desmond owned rags, now it is the UK’s jails which are capitulating to Muslims.

Except they are not.

A Muslim has written a letter to the prisoners’ paper Inside Time but that doesn’t stop Shadow Justice Minister Nick Herbert providing the Daily Star with an outraged quote.

Daily Star, 10 April 2008

Gloves are off as Ken accuses Boris of 7/7 smear on Islam

Boris Johnson today accused the Mayor of “demeaning” his office by suggesting Mr Johnson had smeared Islam after the London bombings. The Tory candidate said he took “deep offence” at Ken Livingstone’s claim he had said the Koran was “inherently” violent.

However, the Mayor insisted Mr Johnson’s remarks – in contrast to his own rousing response to the 7 July attacks – showed his true reaction to the tragedy.

In the first radio hustings on LBC radio between the three main candidates, Mr Johnson insisted he would have issued “exactly the same” kind of remarks after the bombings, which killed 52 people, as Mr Livingstone had if he had been running the city at the time. “What Londoners want in the event of a tragedy of that kind … is someone who will speak for the city and give a voice to our defiance and our unwillingness to submit to that kind of terror and kind of cowardly attack,” he said.

However, the Mayor claimed: “I know what Boris would have said because he wrote it in the Spectator the following week. Very different. I said this is a criminal act by a handful of men. It doesn’t define a faith or an ideology. What you said, Boris, was Islam was the problem… And the Koran is inherently violent. I actually made certain that we were looking at individuals. You smeared an entire faith.”

An audibly furious Mr Johnson responded: “Can I tell you what deep offence I take at that? I think you really traduce what I said. My view is that Islam is a religion of peace and indeed I am very proud to say I have Muslim ancestors. My great-grandfather knew the Koran off by heart, Ken Livingstone, and I really wish you would leave off these kinds of tactics, which demean this race and demean your office.”

Evening Standard, 10 April 2008


For an example of the Spectator‘s coverage of Islam during Boris Johnson’s stint as editor, see our accompanying illustration.

For a selection of Johnson’s statements about Islam, see here.

Ontario Human Rights Commission slams Islamophobia

In a recent decision, the Ontario Human Rights Commission (the “Commission”) decided not to proceed with complaints filed against Maclean’s magazine related to an article “The future belongs to Islam“. The complainants alleged that the content of the magazine and Maclean’s refusal to provide space for a rebuttal violated their human rights.

Denying a service because of human rights grounds such as race or creed can form the basis for a human rights complaint. However, the Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code“) does not give the Commission the jurisdiction to deal with the content of magazine articles through the complaints process.

Nevertheless, the Commission has a broader mandate to promote and advance respect for human rights in Ontario, forward the dignity and worth of every Ontarian and take steps to alleviate tension and conflict in the community, including by speaking out on events that are inconsistent with the spirit of the Code.

While freedom of expression must be recognized as a cornerstone of a functioning democracy, the Commission has serious concerns about the content of a number of articles concerning Muslims that have been published by Maclean’s magazine and other media outlets. This type of media coverage has been identified as contributing to Islamophobia and promoting societal intolerance towards Muslim, Arab and South Asian Canadians.

The Commission recognizes and understands the serious harm that such writings cause, both to the targeted communities and society as a whole. And, while we all recognize and promote the inherent value of freedom of expression, it should also be possible to challenge any institution that contributes to the dissemination of destructive, xenophobic opinions.

Ontario Human Rights Commission statement, 9 April 2008

‘Get off my bus, I need to pray’

81 busThat was the headline to an article in the Sun, which informed its readers that “a Muslim bus driver told stunned passengers to get off so he could PRAY. The white Islamic convert rolled out his prayer mat in the aisle and knelt on the floor facing Mecca. Passengers watched in amazement as he held out his palms towards the sky, bowed his head and began to chant.”

This story, along with the accompanying video clip, was widely circulated around the right-wing blogosphere, where it was presented as yet another example of the “Islamification” of the West. The Freethinker took it as conclusive proof that “the lunacy that is Islam has now insinuated itself into Britain’s public transport system”. Dhimmi Watch introduced the Sun report as a case “from our ever-expanding You Can’t Make This Stuff Up file”.

Continue reading

Anti-sharia protestors bound over

Cathedral protestTwo men who protested against adopting Muslim laws in Britain during an Easter sermon by the Archbishop of Canterbury have had charges against them dropped.

Kyle Spotswood, 26, and Sidney Cordle, 52, from Sheffield, were arrested after waving placards and shouting in front of the pulpit as Dr Williams spoke.

The men were bound over to keep the peace at Canterbury Magistrates’ Court.

The Canterbury Cathedral protest came after Dr Williams spoke about the UK adopting aspects of Islamic Sharia law.

Mr Spotswood, of Dagenham Road and Mr Cordle, of Knowle Lane, were arrested in March after they interrupted Dr Williams’ Easter Sunday sermon at the cathedral.

They stood in front of the pulpit shouting and waving placards which read “Support the persecuted church” and “No to Sharia law”.

The men were charged under section two of the 1860 Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act, which says it is an offence to disrupt a cathedral service.

Speaking outside court, Mr Spotswood said: “I would like to take this opportunity to issue a challenge to the Archbishop of Canterbury to take part in a public debate at the venue of his choice to discuss what should be the Christian response to Sharia law.”

BBC News, 7 April 2008

In 2006 Spotswood stood unsuccessfully for Sheffield council as a Christian Peoples Alliance candidate.