Islam and European identity – Tariq Ramadan responds to the Pope

Tariq_RamadanTariq Ramadan argues that the problems with Pope Benedict’s recent controversial speech go deeper than the mere use of an offensive medieval quotation:

“…. the pope attempted to set out a European identity that would be Christian by faith and Greek by philosophical reason. Islam, which has apparently had no such relationship with reason, would thus be foreign to the European identity that has been built atop this heritage.

“A few years ago, when he was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, he set forth his opposition to the integration of Turkey into Europe on a similar basis. Muslim Turkey never was and never will be able to claim an authentically European culture. It is another thing; it is the Other.

“These are the messages that cry out for an answer, far more than talk of jihad. This profoundly European pope is inviting the peoples of the continent to become aware of the central, inescapable Christian character of their identity, which they risk losing. The message … is deeply troubling and potentially dangerous in its reductionism.

“This is what Muslims must, above all, respond to; they must challenge a reading of the history of European thought from which the role of Muslim rationalism is erased, in which the Arab-Muslim contribution would be reduced to mere translation of the great works of Greece and Rome.

“The selective memory that so easily forgets the decisive contributions of rationalist Muslim thinkers like al-Farabi (10th century), Avicenna (11th century), Averroes (12th century), al-Ghazali (12th century), Ash-Shatibi (13th century) and Ibn Khaldun (14th century) is reconstructing a Europe that practices self-deception about its own past. If they are to reappropriate their heritage, Muslims must demonstrate, in a manner that is both reasonable and free of emotional reactions, that they share the core values upon which Europe and the West are founded.

“Neither Europe nor the West can survive if we continue to attempt to define ourselves by excluding, and by distancing ourselves from, the Other – from Islam, from the Muslims – whom we fear.”

New York Times, 20 September 2006

A political pope

“In recent Islamophobic diatribes, the Pope and others have castigated the Muslims for their resort to the sword to spread their religion. This tactic is outrageous for it airbrushes the crusades, the Inquistion and the Holocaust out of history. All of these atrocities were perpetrated by Christians against millions of victims among the unfortunate non-believers, pagans, Jews and Muslims who lost their lives in wars, in courts of Inquistion or in the Nazi extermination camps arrayed across Germany and Poland….”

Brilliant demolition of Pope Benedict’s ignorant bigotry towards non-Christian religions by Michael Carmichael.

Planetary Movement, 19 September 2006

Benedict’s Papal bull is worthy of Blair

“The Pope’s sectarian attack on Islam at Regensburg was strikingly reminiscent of Tony Blair’s Los Angeles speech on August 1, whooping it up for the War on Terror…. In Los Angeles, Blair referred to an ‘elemental struggle about values … for the soul of the region’, in which the West, perforce, must play a part: ‘We want moderate, mainstream Islam to triumph over reactionary Islam.’ Both men defend Western intervention in the Muslim world to sort out good Islam from bad Islam. The difference between Pope and Premier is the difference between Tweedledum and Tweedle DD.

“This is the main reason Muslims are outraged at Benedict. It doesn’t have to do with irrational sensitivity on the part of religious fundamentalists. It has to do with the function of the Regensburg speech as war propaganda. Aggressors in all wars call history in evidence to elevate their own purpose while demonising (it’s the right word in this context) the enemy. Thus, Benedict’s specific charge was that Islam, of its nature, in contrast to Christianity, endorses the notion of ‘spreading the faith through violence’. The dishonesty is of positively Blairite proportion.”

Eamonn McCann in the Belfast Telegraph, 21 September 2006

Canadian students set up task force to study Islamophobia

The Canadian Federation of Students launched a task force yesterday that will go from school to school across the province to hear from Muslim students who have had good and bad experiences because of their religion.

“I’ve noticed differences in how people treat you,” U of T student Ausma Malik said, adding the treatment can be subtle and come from both students and faculty. Malik will sit on the task force made up of Muslims and non-Muslims from inside and outside the student community.

The task force started as a campaign against “Islamaphobia, anti-Semitism and racism” after Muslim students at Ryerson University were targets of hateful graffiti and posters two years ago, said Jesse Greener, the federation’s Ontario chairman.

Toronto Sun, 21 September 2006

Muslims respond to Reid

There’s quite a decent piece in today’s issue of the freesheet thelondonpaper on the response to Reid’s call on Muslim parents to control their children. After dealing with the disruption of his visit to East London, the article continues:

Despite their differences most Muslims are determined not to let the furore overshadow what they say is the hidden agenda behind Reid’s speech. While they agree that security is an issue, there is a feeling that his speech will serve to feed Islamophobia.

Azad Ali, a 37-year-old Londoner and chairman of the well-respected Muslim Safety Forum is one of those we polled yesterday who believe that Reid’s words were incendiary and naive.

“It is a huge assumption to make that Muslim parents are not concerned about their kids,” said Ali. “Regard less of your religion, what young child does not have a time-keeping issue or make new friends? it is an unfair spotlight on Muslims.

“There was already an atmosphere of unease before Reid’s speech. I just don’t see how these words help to build a cohesive society. They were ill-advised. They will further promote Islamophobia and alienate the Muslim community,” he said.

Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the Islamic Human Rights Commission, said: “The Government talks about terrorists as though there is a sign you can spot, but they should be appealing to everyone for help, not just one community.” Shadjareh added that Reid’s demands were “unrealistic and not demanded from any other community”….

On Brick Lane yesterday London Muslims gave their reaction to Reid’s speech – and opinion was divided.

Shopkeeper Ali Hussain, 29, said it should come as no surprise that Reid was heckled, even if Izzadeen was a known firebrand. “If you have a dog and keep kicking it, it will eventually bite you. And that’s what is happening over Iran and Afghanistan with British Muslims.”

Abdul Rouf, another Brick Lane shopkeeper, said he believed bad feeling should be seen as a political issue. “It’s world politics that turns British Muslims against Tony Blair and his government, but it’s not a problem between Muslims and other ethnic groups at ground level,” he said.

Fatima Mahmood, 24, said Izzadeen’s tirade was pointless and the frustration felt among Muslims must be expressed another way. “Maybe we are treated unfairly, but making a scene won’t change people’s point of view,” he said.

Other Londoners were also critical of the speech. Londonpaper reader Rebecca Priddle believes Reid should show more respect to the Muslim community. In a sarcastic letter to the paper, she wrote:

“Why doesn’t the government ‘go the whole hog’ and install ‘telescreens’ in Muslim houses? That way, the parents will not have to bear the guilt of having to report their radicalised toddlers themselves, and Mr Blair can ensure that all of the infants are rounded up and put into good, Catholic schools where they will receive a well-rounded, Western upbringing.”

What’s right about Islam?

“This is, we are told over-often, the Information Age. So how did it happen that we know nothing of Islam? Nothing good, at any rate. At this point, we in Israel and the West can recite chapter and verse the excesses of those who speak in the name of Islam, bomb in the name of Islam, burn churches in the name of Islam, kill a nun in the name of Islam.

“We smile our thin, knowing smile when we learn that a previously unknown Muslim group calling itself ‘The Army of Guidance’ vows to attack Christian sites in Gaza in retaliation for the remarks of ‘the accursed infidel the Vatican’. We smirk inside when the ‘Lions of Monotheism’ denounce the ‘dogs of Rome’…. But we know nothing. Certainly, we in the news media are guiltier than most of spreading the image of the Muslim as terrorist, of Islam as the enemy.”

Israeli journalist Bradley Burston appeals to Israel and the West to develop a more informed understanding of Islam.

Ha’aretz, 20 September 2006

Kofi Annan warns against clash of civilisations

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan called on Tuesday for sensitivity towards religious beliefs and sacred symbols, warning that mistakes – intentional or not – could trigger a global war of religion. He said the international migration movement, which brought millions of people of different creed and culture to live together, has not united them.

“The misconceptions and stereotypes underlying the idea of a clash of civilisation have come to be more and more widely shared. Insensitivity towards other people’s beliefs or sacred symbols – intentional or otherwise – is seized on by those who seem eager to foment a new war of religion, this time on a global scale,” Annan said in an address opening the political debate in the UN general assembly.

News24.com, 19 September 2006

Pope pursues medieval Islamophobic fantasy

Madeleine Bunting argues that the Pope is a dangerous bigot suffering from “a deep arrogance rooted in a blinkered Catholic triumphalism”. She writes:

“By an uncanny coincidence the legendary Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci died last week…. the Pope had already run into controversy in Italy by inviting the rabid Islamophobe to a private audience just months ago. This is the journalist who published a bestseller in 2001 which amounted to a diatribe of invective against Islam. This is the woman who was only too happy to fling out comments such as ‘Muslims breed like rats’ and ‘the increasing presence of Muslims in Italy and Europe is directly proportional to our loss of freedom’. At the time of her papal audience, Fallaci’s ranting against Islam had landed her in court and there was outrage at the Pope’s insensitive invitation. The Pope refused to backtrack and insisted the meeting was purely ‘pastoral’.

“Put last week’s lecture in Bavaria and the Fallaci audience alongside his vocal opposition to Turkish membership of the EU, and the picture isn’t pretty. On one of the biggest and most volatile issues of our day – the perceived clash between the west and the Muslim world – the Pope seems to have abdicated his papal role of arbitrator, and taken up the arms in a rerun of a medieval fantasy.”

Guardian, 19 September 2006

Pope Benedict trashes John Paul II’s legacy

“As protests against the Pope continued to rumble around the Muslim world yesterday, Catholics began asking themselves if this highly intelligent man can really have been so crass as to have ignited the passions of millions of Muslims without realising that he was doing it.

“If the alternative version is more credible – that he knew exactly what he was doing – then the next question arises: why? The gloomy conclusion of some Vatican experts is that there was no inconsistency in the Pope’s choice of the words ‘inhuman and evil’ – quoted from the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Palaeologus – to characterise Islam. Such a negative view, they say, is consistent with all his words and actions with regard to Islam.

“Their claims make for a tragic contrast with the decades devoted by John Paul II to the challenge of bringing Islam, Judaism and Christianity closer together after many centuries of hatred and bloodshed. Now all that hard work, rowing against the tide of history, seems to be at risk.”

Peter Popham in the Independent, 19 September 2006