A further reply to George Readings

In a piece for the Guardian’s Comment is Free, George Readings of the Quilliam Foundation has finally got round to replying my Socialist Unity article (crossposted at Islamophobia Watch) in which I defended the noted Islamic scholar and Al-Jazeera TV star Yusuf al-Qaradawi against an attack from Readings.

Readings misrepresents my views – and more importantly those of Qaradawi himself – but at least he has attempted to rebut my criticisms with reasoned argument. This is certainly an improvement on Quilliam’s previous methods, which have involved trying to politically blackmail a London Assembly member for whom I worked into taking action against me, and then, after he told Ed Husain to take his threatening email and shove it, hiring libel lawyers in an attempt to shut me up.

Continue reading

Wilders responsible for rise in anti-Muslim hatred say witnesses

Muslim witnesses said Monday that a Dutch lawmaker’s anti-Islamic comments had led to attacks and intimidation, and they pleaded with judges to convict him and give him a symbolic fine of one euro.

“Arson. Attempted arson. Vandalism. Disturbances. Incivility to people attending mosques. Obscenities. Intimidating behavior – they have all become everyday occurrences” as a result of Wilders’ public remarks, said Mohammed Enait, speaking for an alliance of Dutch mosques that had asked to testify as victims in the case.

Enait said Dutch Muslims have suffered tangible damage as a result of Wilders’ repeated negative remarks about Islam. He said there are countless incidences of “children being cursed at while they walk. Stories from women … who are spit upon, mocked because they wear headscarves.” Enait, who is from Rotterdam, said the mosque he attended as a child had been burned down.

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance found that there has been a “dramatic increase in ‘Islamophobia’ in the Netherlands” since 2000.

Several prominent Muslim organizations have asked the new government, which took office last week, to examine the problem, citing an incident earlier this year where a dead sheep was left on a site where a mosque is being built in the city of Roosendaal. Last month, a mosque in Groningen was burned in an arson attack, and as recently as last weekend, a bullet was fired at a mosque in the city of Dordrecht.

The conservative minority government relies on the support of Wilders’ Freedom Party to pass bills in parliament. It has not reacted to the request from the Muslim groups.

Associated Press, 18 October 2010

Update:  See also Dutch News, 19 October 2010

Police face legal threat over Birmingham spy cameras

West Midlands Police is facing legal action if it does not remove all cameras controversially put up in largely Muslim areas of Birmingham.

More than 200 covert and overt cameras were installed in Washwood Heath and Sparkbrook, paid for with government money to tackle terrorism.

The force said the covert ones had been removed after uproar from residents. But Liberty plans to start a judicial review if there is no commitment made to remove the rest within two weeks.

BBC News, 18 October 2010

Dr Bari replies to Nick Cohen’s smears

In a letter published in today’s Observer the Chairman of the East London Mosque replies to Nick Cohen’s rant in last week’s issue:

The findings of University College London’s thorough inquiry into the Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab affair were presented in a clear, insightful report. Disappointed at the outcome, Nick Cohen chose to attack me personally.

Through the usual tactic of guilt by tenuous association, Nick Cohen brands me, in all but name, an extremist, a label I utterly reject. I abhor extremism of any kind and continue to work tirelessly to bring communities together.

Cohen labours hard to smear the East London Mosque, where I am currently the chairman. In his latest diatribe, he wrongly claims the mosque is dominated by Jamaat-e-Islami. I hold no brief for Jamaat-e-Islami. The East London Mosque is run by British Muslims of diverse backgrounds, with deep roots in the community, who expend time and energy to make it an institution that is welcoming to all faiths and none.

Cohen fails to mention that the “Saudi preacher” he refers to is Sheikh as-Sudais, a leading imam at Islam’s holiest sanctuary in Makkah. The remarks attributed to him have never been uttered at the East London Mosque and I have no hesitation in dissociating myself and our mosque from such views.

Extremism and bigotry of any kind are to be confronted. Nick Cohen would do well to reflect on his own divisive rhetoric.

Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari
Chairman, East London Mosque

Bigotry and Islam: the real problem isn’t Bill O’Reilly but the millions of Americans who agree with him

Bill O’Reilly and his inflammatory speech was on The View this week, and everybody knows it. But, the attention should go elsewhere.

His baseless anti-Muslim rhetoric that led Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg to walk off the set earlier this week was a ratings boon for him and the show. O’Reilly appeared on the Glenn Beck show and The View hosts are scheduled to discuss Thursday’s show on Monday.

The show is likely to grab more ratings and headlines, but really, it’s time to shift gears and focus on the anti-Islam hysteria sweeping over the U.S. Bill O’Reilly is getting bashed in the press, but thousands, maybe millions, agree with him. Some of them are silent. Many are not. It has become mainstream to bash Muslims.

John Esposito and Sheila Lalwani at the Huffington Post, 16 October 2010

Majority of Tennesseans don’t oppose Murfreesboro mosque

A new poll finds a majority of Tennesseans are not opposed to a mosque in Murfreesboro and would not oppose one near their homes, but a majority does oppose a planned mosque in New York City near Ground Zero.

The telephone poll of 614 randomly selected Tennesseans aged 18 and over found that 42 percent neither support nor oppose the planned construction of an Islamic community center near Murfreesboro and 24 percent either “support” or “strongly support” the center’s construction.

Results were similar when people were presented with the prospect of a hypothetical mosque near their homes, with 66 percent saying they would either support or not oppose the proposition.

However, 63 percent of those polled said they were opposed to the proposed mosque near Ground Zero in New York City. Another 20 percent said they neither support nor oppose the mosque’s construction. Only 15 percent said they support its construction.

Two-thirds of those polled said they “agree” or “strongly agree” that Muslims should have the same religious rights as other Americans. The poll also found that 44 percent of Tennesseans do not believe American Muslims heighten the risk of terrorism, while 28 percent believe they do.

Associated Press, 14 October 2010

See also The Tennessean, 15 October 2010

Protest against Geller and Spencer speaking at Philadelphia’s Temple University

Temple University protestor

“Off of our campus, out of our state! We say no to racist hate!” was the chant that rang out October 7 from some 50 antiracist protesters. They could be heard inside Howard Gittis Student Center as two professional Islamophobes, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, prepared to speak.

North Philadelphia’s Temple University prides itself on being diverse. As University President Ann Weaver Hart said in a 2008 Associated Press interview, “You’ll see the world walking about on the Temple campus.”

With this is mind, why was blogger and “birther” Pamela Geller – who believes that the 9/11 hijackers were practicing “pure Islam, original Islam” – and her equally anti-Muslim confidant, right-wing author Robert Spencer, given an audience at such an institution?

Geller and Spencer’s group Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) has been instrumental in drumming up the controversy over the Park51 Islamic community center in Manhattan, which they labeled the “Ground Zero Mosque.” The two led a protest near the site of the future community center on September 11. Park51 was to be the topic of the event at Temple.

The group that brought this duo to Temple is a student organization called Temple University (TU) Purpose. This organization requests funding from the university and has close ties with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, whose namesake is a prominent New-Leftist-turned-right-winger.

TU Purpose claims to be on a mission to “create a dialogue where discussion needs to be had” and to “eradicate obstacles – like political correctness … which deprive us of information that is both essential and critical to our analytical and social development.”

Despite its humanistic claptrap about promoting “dialogue” and supposedly defending “free speech,” TU Purpose has proven to be little more than a right-wing front group – primarily interested in providing a stage for racist hate speech. For instance, last year, TU Purpose hosted an event with Dutch right-winger Geert Wilders, an individual so Islamophobic that he has literally called for the banning of the Koran.

Many were outraged by TU Purpose’s plans to bring Islamophobic speakers to campus for the second year in a row. However, Temple’s chapter of the Muslim Student Association chose not to encourage a demonstration, fearing that protesting the speakers would give Geller and Spencer too much publicity, thus doing more harm than good. Despite this, many activists chose to turn out in opposition to the racist speakers.

Members of the International Socialist Organization, Delaware Valley Veterans Against the War, Socialist Action and various student activists held a demonstration of about 50 people as Geller and Spencer spoke.

Protester and Muslim student Sahar Abdullah noted that she has been the victim of anti-Muslim ostracism several times since the September 11 terrorist attacks. Speaking “as a person of the Islamic faith,” she said in an interview, hate speech is “not what the Koran tells us to stand for.”

Noting the contradiction between Temple’s celebrated diversity and the views of Geller and Spencer, freshman Julia Murphy remarked, “Temple claims to be one of the most diverse campuses,” and “it’s wrong to host these speakers.”

Since the beginning of this year, we have witnessed the bombing of a Florida mosque, arson at a Tennessee mosque construction site and the stabbing of a Muslim taxi driver in New York. In this climate of anti-Muslim hate crimes and Islamophobia, hate speech is ignored at our peril.

It is imperative that those who stand with our Muslim brothers and sisters against racism turn out in full opposition to hate speech whenever possible, and show that such vitriol is not welcome in our communities.

Socialist Worker, 15 October 2010

Fox News promotes belief in false rumours about Park51

A survey analysis released today by Ohio State researchers finds that Fox News viewing contributes significantly to the spread of false rumors about the New York City mosque. Moreover, respondents who held these false beliefs were not only more likely to oppose the NYC mosque but also more likely to oppose the building of a mosque in their own communities.

Big Think, 14 October 2010

Sharia law to conquer North America through Campbell’s soup

Does low-fat cream-of-broccoli soup sound threatening to you? No? Well then clearly you’re unaware of the threat radical Islam poses to baseball, apple pie, and good old Campbell’s soup.

At least that’s the line being taken by opponents of anything even marginally affiliated with Islam, on news that Campbell’s Canada rolled out a line of halal-certified soups earlier this year. (Halal, meaning legal under religious law.)

Apparently, “the 15 soups comply with Islamic dietary regulations which, much like kosher regulations, prohibit certain foods and define the right way to slaughter animals.” But to the self-appointed defenders of America, this wasn’t a business decision, it was a sign that “Sharia is coming to North America – this time, via the grocery store.” …

People (including the Tea Party Nation) are already calling for a boycott of Campbell’s. “This is just another way that terrorism and its sponsors are insinuating themselves into our culture,” wrote one irate Facebooker. “There are stages to the Islamization of non-Islamic countries.”

Stage 1, apparently, is soup.

Bruce Maiman at Examiner.com, 13 October 2010