Muslims to be offered Sharia-compliant pensions by Government

Muslims are to be offered Sharia-compliant pension funds by a new Government body. The scheme to provide retirement funds for millions who do not already have a company pension is likely to include a special option that would not invest in companies deemed sinful under Islam.

The decision to provide a Sharia-compliant pension fund is another sign of the growing influence of Islamic law in British public life and in particular the country’s finance industry.

Douglas Murray, director of the Centre for Social Cohesion think tank, said the Government should not be creating parallel financial or legal systems for different groups in Britain. He said: “It’s a great mistake for the Government to think this is desirable or even necessary.”

Daily Telegraph, 22 November 2008

Prosecute BNP says Bruce Kent

Bruce Kent“I have received, unsolicited, from the leader of the British National Party, a 12-page document supposedly setting out details of crimes against whites committed by other ethnic groups.

“One intended effect will be to increase racism in general and Islamophobia, in particular. When the document describes gang rape and teenage grooming, it says: ‘One community, however, is different. Wherever there are large numbers of young Muslim men, groups of them team up to lure girls – often as young as twelve or thirteen – into a nightmare world of sexual abuse, rape, beatings, drug addiction and prostitution … the Muslim sex gangs … never target girls from their own community.’ The pamphlet also claims that there is a refusal by ‘Muslim leaders to condemn what is going on’.

“To suggest that gang rape is a normal feature of Muslim male life and that Muslim leaders tolerate it, is not only untrue, but is designed to fan the flames of racial and religious hatred. It is certainly immoral and ought to merit criminal prosecution as well.”

Letter from Bruce Kent in the Times, 21 November 2008

Islamaphobia behind the harassment and intimidation of a British charity

The British Muslim Initiative condemns unconditionally the move by Lloyds TSB to force the Islamic Bank of Britain to close the account of the British charitable organisation INTERPAL.

While on the outside, this appears like another misguided knee-jerk premature reaction in response to the pressures of the anti-Palestine Zionist lobby, a closer inspection offers the suggestion that this is a gross example of Islamaphobia at work.

What gives the right to Lloyds TSB, recently bailed out by hundreds of millions of pounds of British Tax-payers cash including Muslims, to use such outrageous bully tactics with a smaller British bank forcing it to close down the accounts of a British charitable organisation, is beyond comprehension, unless one begins to see that the smaller bank in question is the Islamic Bank of Britain, and the charity is one that has been working for over a decade to alleviate the suffering of and providing humanitarian aid to Palestinians.

At a time when the British economy is at risk of collapse, and the need for foreign investment and the confidence of investors both at home and overseas is pressing, this move tarnishes the image of British fair play and erodes the confidence of potential stakeholders in our banking sector.

The Prime Minister’s comments during his recent tour of Arab and Muslim countries in order to solidify our economy and strengthen the positions of our banks, including Lloyds TSB, could not have made a stronger case for this particular objective.

Mohammed Sawalha, President of BMI commented on this decision last week stating: “We are still hopeful that Lloyds TSB will re-address this decision, and allow the re-instatement of INTERPAL accounts with the Islamic Bank of Britain.”

British Muslim Initiative, 19 November 2008

Quebec coalition criticises ‘reasonable accommodation’ hearings

A coalition of Muslim and social justice-groups says the Bouchard-Taylor commission has fanned the flames of racism and Islamophobia by offering a platform to those with extremist views. Instead of dealing with such issues as exploitation of immigrant, home-care and migrant workers, the commission has sought to deal with minor irritants, speakers from various groups said yesterday.

May Haydar, of the Al-Hidaya Association, said the reasonable-accommodation debate was “fabricated, manipulated” because “there is no crisis.” Poverty and streets gangs in Montreal are the real issues, she continued, while Muslim women with headscarves, Sikh men with Kirpans, and Jews with skullcaps are not threats.

The coalition, under the banner Refusing Intolerance in Quebec, plans to organize a series of demonstrations to underline its stance on these issues.

Montreal Gazette, 20 November 2007

Scots jail succumbs to the Islamisation of western civilisation

Prison chiefs are defying an official report and serving halal meat to an entire young offenders institute to avoid upsetting a handful of Muslim inmates. Managers at Polmont run the risk of being accused of pandering to political correctness.

It is thought they are buying in chicken from a halal supplier to avoid being accused of religious discrimination. But the chickens – which have their throats cut to satisfy Islamic law – are required by only seven young men.

Last year a report by Her Majesty’s Inspector of Prisons forced bosses to cut back on sourcing all of its meat from halal butchers due to the small numbers of Muslims. Inspectors found it too expensive to justify. But prison officials admit that they continued the policy to avoid “prejudicing the position” of the handful of religious inmates.

Mark Wallace, spokesman for the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “A lot of people will be concerned that money meant for the criminal justice system is instead being spent on food that is dubious in terms of animal welfare, as well as more expensive.”

Daily Express, 20 November 2008

BNP protests after arrests

BNP Burnley protestBNP supporters were demonstrating outside a police station after its members were arrested for stirring up racial hatred.

Four men were held this morning after a police investigation over the distribution of leaflets in Burnley, Lancashire, branding Muslims responsible for the heroin trade. Nick Griffin, leader of the far-right party, visited the town, to protest outside Burnley Police station at the “persecution” of its members arrested after “Gestapo-like dawn raids” by police.

Each of the leaflets features a harrowing photo of Rachel Whitear, 21, who was found dead at her flat in Exmouth, Devon, in May 2000, holding a syringe. The photo of Rachel made national headlines after her parents agreed for it to be released to warn other youngsters of the dangers of drugs. Rachel’s mother, Pauline Holcroft, 58, of Ledbury, Herefordshire, later said the leaflets were “insulting and offensive”.

The leaflet was distributed to homes in Burnley and is also reportedly circulating in other parts of Lancashire, Cumbria and Yorkshire. It says people should “heap condemnation” on Muslims and that it is time for them to “apologise” as it claims they are responsible for 95% of the world’s heroin trade.

The leaflets, which first appeared around March, were first distributed by a former BNP candidate, according to the party’s website.

Manchester Evening News, 19 November 2008

Update:  See also BNP report “BNP Men Questioned ‘After Pressure from Muslim Police Association‘”.

Mosque site in Swedish town again desecrated with dead pig

Dead pig at Ramberget mosque siteSvenska Dagbladet reports that pieces of a dead pig have been found at the site where a mosque is to be built in the Swedish town of Ramberget. Pigs’ heads were left at the same site earlier this year.

Mohammad El-Alti, director of the foundation responsible for the construction of the mosque, is quoted as saying: “I think this is just the beginning. What will happen when the mosque is completed?”

Goran Larsson, a researcher at Gothenburg University, says there are studies showing that many mosques in Sweden have been subjected to various forms of desecration and vandalism, many of which go unrecorded

Mayor Johnson fails to condemn GPU smear by Policy Exchange

MuradMurad Qureshi, member of the London Assembly, questioned the Mayor of London on the briefing circulated by Policy Exchange prior to the Global Peace and Unity event this year.

Murad asked: “In view of the warm welcome you sent to this year’s Global Peace & Unity Event at the Excel Centre, will you join me in condemning the irresponsible ‘briefing’ circulated by Policy Exchange which sought to associate this mainstream and well-attended event with extremism?”

Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, replied: “I am not aware of any such briefing, so I am unable to comment on it.”

The Mayor’s Director of Policy, Anthony Browne, and his Director of Arts, Culture and the Creative Industries, Munira Mirza, are both from Policy Exchange.

PX sought to discredit the hosting of the GPU this year and circulated a briefing note urging politicians and others to stay away. The leader of the Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg MP, brought the briefing to light and wrote to Neil O’Brien, PX Director, criticising the organisation’s attempt to sully the reputation and intent of the GPU.

The Mayor’s response will seem unsatisfactory to many given the strong links between members of his administration and Policy Exchange.

ENGAGE, 19 November 2008

Children ‘bullied for their beliefs’

BeatbullyingOne in four children with a religious belief is bullied at school as a result of their faith, research shows.

The findings have prompted anti-bullying campaigners to urge ministers to make it compulsory for schools to record all incidents of faith-based bullying, as they have to do in cases of racism and homophobia.

The survey of more than 1,000 pupils by the anti-bullying charity BeatBullying, showed that 23 per cent of the pupils were bullied as a result of their faith. In addition, 9 per cent of those with a faith were bullied as a result of wearing religious symbols to school. One 13-year-old Muslim girl said: “These two girls knew we were fasting, they got me in the toilets and tried to force crisps down my throat; they were all laughing their heads off.”

Independent, 17 November 2008


Read the Beatbullying Interfaith Report (pdf) here.

The report contains many other disturbing accounts of Muslim pupils being verbally abused and physically assaulted:

“They pushed me down the stairs, kicked me, dragged me by [my] hair, broke my tooth and hit me with a chair. They said my dad did 7/7.” (Jagatveer age 15)

“They would call me Paki, tell me to go back to Paki land and live with Osama.” (Mavish age 13)

“I got called a Paki and told that my religion was stupid.” (Jabeen age 12)

“Sometimes I hear boys laughing about bombs in Iraq. They do it in front of me, laughing that more Muslims have been blown up.” (Aruni age 13)

Still, not to worry – over at the National Secular Society website NSS president Terry Sanderson assures us that these are “claims to be read with a pinch of salt”.

Inayat Bunglawala – ally of al‑Muhajiroun

More barking nonsense from David Toube of Harry’s Place at Comment is Free. Toube accuses Inayat Bunglawala of “rushing to the defence of the jihadists of al-Muhajiroun” in his recent CiF piece.

Toube continues: “In relation to my call to arrest those who are presently running al-Muhajiroun, Inayat states ‘it is not entirely clear what crime Choudhury is meant to have committed’. Let me help him out. In 2006, the government banned al-Ghurabaa and The Saved Sect, which is what al-Muhajiroun at that time called itself. They’re on the list of proscribed terrorist organisations. There is no difference between the personnel, the organisation, or the message of those groups, and ‘Islam4UK’. Indeed, the site gives Choudhury and Omar Bakri Mohammed’s phone numbers as contacts. There is no legal reason that Choudhury should not be arrested. He ought to be. I hope that he soon is.”

As AllyF points out in the comments:

“So David, you’ve now written two separate blog pieces saying that Choudhury should have been arrested for incitement and membership of a proscribed organisation, without presenting a single shred of evidence in your support.

“One of the legal problems with proscribing organisations like Al-Muhajiroun / Saved Sect is that they abolish themselves and reappear under different names. It doesn’t give the police the right to retrospectively arrest people for prior membership of now banned organisations.

“And several times now you have accused Choudhury of incitement to terrorism without producing a shred of evidence in support of the claim. I’m amused that you don’t intend to sue Inayat for libel. If I were you I would cling to hopes that Choudhury has similar intentions towards you, because accusing people of serious criminal offences without evidence can be an expensive business.”

Continue reading