Trials and arrests underline EDL racism and violence

The arrest and conviction of supporters of the racist English Defence League (EDL) in the last few weeks underlines the lie that they are a peaceful, anti-racist organisation – and proves that it is right to build a movement big enough to drive them from our streets.

Two supporters of the EDL pled guilty to common assault and a public order offence following an attack on a Leicester Unite Against Fascism (UAF) organising meeting in the run up to the EDL march on 9 October.

James Elliott pled guilty to common assault and a public order offence, while Michael Stephen Thomas pled guilty to a public order offence at Leicester magistrates court on 6 December.

Continue reading

Killers were known to police for links to EDL

Two murderers of a vulnerable Lincoln man had links to the far-right English Defence League, according to police.

Daryll Jones, 17, and Mark Jackson, 21, were two of the top targets in Lincolnshire Police’s attempts to ban people from the Sincil Bank area on Lincoln City match days. They were identified by football intelligence officers along with ten others in Operation Argyll. As reported in the Echo, this operation aims to use civil football banning orders to stop people hanging around with suspected troublemakers.

But the cases against Jones and Jackson, of Yarborough Road, Lincoln, were put on hold after they were arrested on suspicion of killing football enthusiast Shaun Rossington. Asperger’s sufferer Shaun, 21, of Dunkirk Road, was found to have suffered more than 40 injuries. He was punched, kicked and stamped on during the attack on grassland, off Searby Road, on June 3.

Jones and Jackson were found guilty of his murder, along with two others, at Nottingham Crown Court on Friday.

This is Lincolnshire, 22 December 2010

Zakir Naik takes exclusion battle to Court of Appeal

Court documents show an Islamic scholar and orator barred from the UK by the government is taking his battle to London’s Court of Appeal. Dr Zakir Naik lodged papers at London’s Court of Appeal in Appeal Court Reference no 2010/2913, against a High Court ruling and promised to take his fight for freedom of expression to Europe.

The appeal, due to be heard next year, could put the Home Secretary under severe pressure as one of the key aspects of his appeal is the fact that her ban was against the advice and wishes of Britain’s counter terrorism chief Charles Farr, claim Dr Naik’s lawyers.

Last month at London’s High Court, Justice Cranston granted Dr Naik a judicial review and declared three exclusion letters on June 16, 17 and 25 were “unlawful”.

However he decided a fourth attempt was legal despite accepting Dr Naik, who has hired a leading specialist solicitor Tayab Ali and two QCs from Cherie Booth’s Matrix Chambers, didn’t have a chance to respond to all of the issues raised in the final letter.

Dr Naik has now launched an appeal against the verdict saying the system should have been operated “properly and competently”.

Official Court papers filed by lawyers acting on behalf of Dr Naik, claim May failed to “properly consider, or state what she made of, or explain why she ultimately rejected the advice provided by skilled advisers relating to counter-terrorism.”

His lawyer Tayab Ali said: “Dr Naik will not stop until justice is done and he is allowed to exercise his right of freedom of expression.”

PRWeb, 23 December 2010

Dakota City councilman erects ‘Never trust a man named Mohamed’ sign

Never trust a man named MohamedDakota City councilman Bob Lane whipped up a controversy when he placed a sign on his property reading “Never Trust a Man Named Mohamed.”

Lane, well-known in Dakota City for his strong opinions primarily on local and county government, placed the sign near a multiplex rental unit he owns in the 300 block of North 14th Street, a high-traffic route into the Dakota County town of 1,827. The sign led several residents to lodge complaints at City Hall.

Lane told the Journal he had removed the Mohamed sign after it had been up for more than a week and replaced it midafternoon Monday with a holiday message. He didn’t specify what the Mohamed name referenced.

“It is freedom of speech. Whenever we have a problem in the nation, the first name, the middle name or the last name is often Mohamed,” said Lane, a multi-term councilman who was re-elected this year.

Kathy Bruyere lives in South Sioux City and owns rental property in Dakota City near the sign. “I find this very offensive,” Bruyere said. “We have a lot of East African workers who come to Tyson (Foods packing plant), and they are going to see this every day. A city councilman should not be representing the city of Dakota City in this manner. It is a manner that promotes hate and fear.”

Sioux City Journal, 21 December 2010

Via LoonWatch

EDL demonstrates in support of right to religious harassment

EDL protest ReadingThe English Defence League staged a protest in Reading today (Thursday) in support of a man arrested after hanging a St George’s flag outside a mosque.

Around 20 members of the controversial campaign group came from across the South East to demonstrate outside Reading Magistrates’ Court monitored by a heavy police presence. Among them was co-founder Tommy Robinson, who toldThe Chronicle: “Our argument is with militant Islam. What’s far right about protecting women’s rights and gay people’s rights? The problem is the teachers of Islam, it’s got nothing to do with your colour. It all comes back to the Koran.”

Inside the court 37-year-old Tilehurst man Ronald Peterson was on trial for religiously aggravated harassment. The court heard he went to the partially built mosque in Oxford Road, west Reading, on May 30 to protest over the way its planning application was handled by the borough council. Peterson, with two other men, draped the St George’s flag on a fence, posed for pictures and chanted “E, E, E.D.L” and “England”.

Witness Urfan Azad, 32, told the court he was in the nearby Reading Tea House and went outside after hearing the chanting. He said he dialled 999 because he was concerned the situation could escalate, and added: “My concern was the flag needed to be taken off the fence because it might be seen by Muslims as a religious symbol. I felt upset about the whole incident. I’m British myself, I was born in Reading. It’s made me feel a bit socially excluded.”

Police arrived on the scene within minutes and, without warning him or giving him a chance to move on, arrested Peterson on the spot. Sgt Lee Barnham said he spoke to Mr Azad, and added: “He was offended by the use of what he considered to be a religious cross against the site of worship. It was clear he was upset and felt intimidated. I was satisfied an offence under the public order act had been committed.”

Peterson, who described the mosque as an “eyesore” and “monstrosity”, told the court he was unhappy because it had not been built in the required time but instead had planning permission re-granted and was given council funding. Peterson denied being a racist but said he had a problem with the ideology of Islam. He added: “Go and see countries that are run by that ideology, it’s oppressive.”

District Judge Andrew Vickers reserved his verdict and the case was adjourned until January 13.

Reading Chronicle, 23 December 2010

Police arrest EDL’s Guramit Singh

Guramit Singh in PeterboroughOne of the leaders of the English Defence League (EDL) has been arrested after police received complaints about his speech during their protest in Peterborough on 11th December.

Guramit Singh (28), from Nottingham, was arrested yesterday (22nd December) on suspicion of intentionally causing religiously aggravated harassment, alarm or distress.

Cambridgeshire Police received two complaints after Mr Singh, an unofficial leader and spokesman for the EDL, gave a speech during the EDL’s two-hour protest in the city on Saturday, December 11.

Mr Singh was addressing around 1,000 EDL supporters and hundreds of onlooking members of the public during his speech, which was delivered outside Peterborough Magistrates’ Court and has since been uploaded onto YouTube.

A spokeswoman for Cambridgeshire Police said:

“A 28-year-old man from Nottingham was arrested on suspicion of intentionally causing religiously aggravated harassment alarm or distress, under section four of the public order act 1986. He was questioned in Nottingham and has now been bailed. Police are investigating whether any further criminal offences were committed during protests in Peterborough. The arrested man will return to a police station in Cambridgeshire in February.”

Police investigations are ongoing following the marches and officers have asked anyone with information to contact them on 0345 456 4564 or Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.

Peterborough Evening Telegraph, 22 December 2010

See also “Guramit Singh in anti-Muslim tirade”, Bartholomew’s Notes on Religion, 22 December 2010

Mail recycles old story about ‘killing for Islam’

“The latest WikiLeaks revelation: 1 in 3 British Muslim students back killing for Islam and 40% want Sharia law”, reads a typical shock-horror headline in today’s Daily Mail. The reference is to the findings in a July 2008 report by the right-wing anti-Muslim think-tank, the Centre for Social Cohesion, whose figures were quoted in a leaked diplomatic cable from the US embassy in London.

Regular readers of the Mail may have been struck by a feeling of déjà vu. And understandably so. The paper ran an article on the CSC report at the time, under the headline “One third of British Muslim students say it’s acceptable to kill for Islam”. The Mail has just seized the opportunity to recycle an old story. But then, you can never have too many scaremongering articles about Muslims, can you?

And this is hardly “the latest WikiLeaks revelation” anyway. TheMail‘s article quotes from two diplomatic cables, one dated 6 January 2009 and the other 5 February 2010. As you can see, they were released by Wikileaks back on 14 December.

Nor can the unnamed Daily Mail reporter claim that their belated exposé is based on any original research. In fact the article is clearly derived from a piece that appeared on the right-wing US website WorldNetDaily on 16 December.

See also “Daily Mail scaremongers about ‘Killing for Islam'”, ENGAGE, 22 December 2010

Update:  See Martin Robbins, “Mail’s Wikileaks ‘revelation’ about Muslim students is their own 2008 story”, The Lay Scientist, 22 December 2010

APPG on Islamophobia: please support ENGAGE

Engagebanner

“What is happening to Muslim political engagement in our democratic process? It appears that anyone who doesn’t espouse the right sort of political views will be labelled an ‘Islamist’ and therefore cannot be trusted to give evidence about incidents of abuse and attacks motivated by Islamophobia.”

ENGAGE has written to its supporters asking for their assistance in resisting a concerted campaign by bloggers and Islamophobes to remove ENGAGE from the secretariat of the recently established All Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia. APPG Chairman Kris Hopkins MP and co-Vice Chair, Lord Janner, bilaterally decided to do just this even though Simon Hughes MP, co-Vice Chair, issued a statement strongly supporting ENGAGE.

You can write to Kris Hopkins at kris.hopkins.mp@parliament.uk (and cc Simon Hughes at simon@simonhughes.org.uk) with the following message:

We strongly object to the implications of the joint statement issued by Kris Hopkins MP and Lord Janner of Braunstone, as reported in the Jewish Chronicle on Friday 10th December, on their intent to remove ENGAGE as the secretariat to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia. We urge all members of the Group and parliamentarians of all parties to reject their recommendation and to resist the pressure being exerted by right wing bloggers and the pro-Zionist lobby.

Please also sign the online petition to register your support for ENGAGE as the secretariat to the APPG.

For more information contact ENGAGE at info@iengage.org.uk