Lords urged to defend justice

Lords urged to defend justiceLords urged to defend justice

By Louise Nousratpour

Morning Star, 6 July 2007

Civil rights campaigners urged Law Lords to “prosecute, not persecute” terror suspects on Thursday at the start of a six-day hearing into the legality of the repressive control orders regime.

A panel of five Law Lords headed by Lord Bingham began hearing appeals from 10 people placed under control orders – including “house arrest,” tagging, curfews and restricted access to phones and the internet – without charge or trial. They argue that the measures introduced under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 violate their right to liberty and a fair trial.

The hearing includes Home Secretary Jacqui Smith’s appeal against a ruling last year by the High Court and Court of Appeal that control orders breached the European convention on human rights.

Amnesty International UK urged Britain’s legal authorities to commit themselves to “prosecuting rather than persecuting” anyone accused of terrorism. It condemned the control order regime as running “counter to the principle of equality before the law,” adding: “It is intrinsically inimical to the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and human rights protection in the UK.”

Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn urged the Law Lords to use their powers to ensure that the right to a “fair and independent” legal process is protected.

“The control orders are a form of executive detention and a denial of access to an independent judicial system and I opposed it in Parliament for those reasons,” he said. “I hope the Law Lords will use their authority to ensure that we maintain the separation between the judiciary and political powers.”

Continue reading

Islam, multiculturalism and immigrants – the main causes of terrorism

Rod Liddle“We began with the usual and – this time – quite surreal assurances from politicians, Muslim leaders and, in particular the BBC, that the latest attacks were ‘nothing to do with Islam’. This is what we always hear when a bomb has gone off, or failed to go off – and it is always a silly statement, based upon nothing more real than wishful thinking….

“Then, as always happens, we had the next stage of wishful thinking … we were assured by assorted correspondents and politicians that Britain’s Muslim community were, in their entirety, appalled and outraged by the attacks. Well, maybe they were – but how do you know? … Don’t forget that more than half of our Muslims feel sympathy for suicide bombers in Israel and a fairly hefty minority (one in eight, at the last count) for similar action against the cockroach imperialist infidel scum (i.e. you and me) over here. Not to mention almost half of Britain’s Muslims who want Sharia law in this country and do not remotely, therefore, share our norms and values.

“We are told these sorts of things in order to stop us coming to unpalatable conclusions, because the government still clings, ever more precariously, to the vestigial tail of that discredited ideology, multiculturalism. Take, for example, the issue of immigration. The aspirant, useless bombers who missed their targets at Glasgow and London came here from Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan. A recent Mori opinion poll commissioned by the government’s Commission on Integration and Cohesion showed that almost 70 per cent of British people thought that we had let far too many immigrants into the country….

“Every month or so we read that the immigration appeals court has allowed some murderous lunatic from the Maghreb or beyond to stay in the country, despite his clearly stated homicidal impulses, because it would be an infringement of his human rights were he to be returned to the Islamic hellhole from which he arrived…. It is surely only a matter of time before someone who comes before the immigration appeals court is allowed to stay and later blows himself up in a public place. Perhaps it has happened already.”

Spectator, 7 July 2007

Although, to be fair, unlike Nick Cohen et al, at the end of the piece Liddle does at least get around to mentioning the attack on Iraq as a contributory (albeit secondary) factor in encouraging terrorism: “Whatever your feelings about the war, it must, surely, provide a moral justification for those Islamists intent upon unleashing murder upon our soil….”

UK Muslims condemn attacks

Muslims UnitedBritish Muslim communities have taken out newspaper advertisements condemning the recent attempted bomb attacks in London and at Glasgow airport in Scotland.

The “Muslims United” advertisement is being placed in the UK’s Guardian and Metro newspapers. It rejects any attempts to link criminal attacks to the teachings of Islam, and calls for society to remain united. The advertisement is supported by all mainstream Muslim organisations in the UK and individuals from a wide range of professions, organisers said.

Ihtisham Hibatullah, spokesman for the British Muslim Initiative, which is helping organise the campaign, said doctors made up the bulk of those who had joined the campaign. “The overwhelming response has come from the medical profession,” he said, highlighting the fact that seven of the people detained over the recent failed attacks were from the medical profession. “People in the profession want to be heard saying ‘not in their name’.”

Reuters, 5 July 2007

‘I’m proud to be called intolerant’, says Nick Cohen

“Those who will kill for an Islamist empire find grievances in anything and everything – a knighthood for Salman Rushdie, the existence of Israel and all the Arab governments that don’t follow their commands, Danish cartoons and girls who deserve to die because they dance around in London clubs like ‘slags’, as one wannabe bomber put it.”

Nick Cohen proudly announces his membership of the “it’s nothing to do with foreign policy” brigade. But then, as one of the foremost “left-wing” cheerleaders for the Iraq war, he would say that, wouldn’t he?

Continue reading

Bring in racial profiling, urges Express

Terror Search FiascoPolice chiefs were last night under intense pressure to use racial profiling in the battle to prevent ­further terror strikes.

All the suspects in the latest failed attacks are young adults of Asian or Middle Eastern descent. But officers carrying out spot checks at key sites have been told not to target people based on their ethnicity or age.

The policy has led to accusations that police bosses are more worried about upsetting minority groups than protecting the country. One frustrated officer last night said: “In these extreme circumstances the rules need to be changed because otherwise we are wasting our resources.”

Tory MP Philip Davies said: “I agree with him completely. It makes my blood boil. In a nutshell, what police officers are being told is put political correctness above the security of people in this country.”

Daily Express, 5 July 2007

Clashes over ban for Hizb ut-Tahrir

HizbThere have been Commons clashes over whether or not Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir should be banned. Conservative leader David Cameron told MPs that ministers should act against “groups which are seeking to radicalise young people”. The government had pledged to ban the group two years ago, he said. “We think it should be banned. Why hasn’t it happened?” Gordon Brown said that “you have to have evidence” to ban any group. But Cameron said that Hizb ut-Tahrir is “poisoning the minds of young people”.

ePolitix, 4 July 2007

See also Conservative Party press release, 4 July 2007

Read Hizb ut-Tahrir’s reply to Cameron here

Give us the freedom to disagree with you

Ismail Patel of the British Muslim Initiative welcomes the “measured responses” of the prime minister and other politicians to the abortive terrorist attacks in Glasgow and London. He adds: “It falls equally upon the Government and Muslims in our country to work in tandem. To truly tackle the terrorists, Mr Brown must steer a change from the political approach of the Blair years during which the Government by and large engaged only with those Muslims who have acquiesced to the former’s political stance.”

Independent, 4 July 2007

Muslim leaders organise anti-terror rally

Muslims are organising a rally in Glasgow on Saturday to demonstrate a united front against terrorism and to quell fears of a backlash against Scotland’s Islamic community.

Mosques and Islamic organisations hope that the event, which will be held on July 7, the second anniversary of the fatal bombings in London, will demonstrate their resolve against terrorism. They are inviting everyone to take part, including faith leaders, churches, trade unionists and others in civic society under the title “Scotland United Against Terror”.

However, Osama Saeed, Scottish spokesman for the Muslim Association of Britain, who is helping to organise the rally, said he feared “rising hostility” against Scotland’s generally well-integrated Muslim community.

Times, 4 July 2007

See also the Scotsman, 4 July 2007

BMI welcomes ‘new tone’ from Brown government

“The British Muslim Initiative welcomes the new tone that has emerged over recent days from corners of the new government under the premiership of Gordon Brown. Following the terror plots in London and Glasgow, the British people had become accustomed to a near frenzied reaction which contained the usage of loaded terms and phrases, closely followed by heavy-handed legislation proposals. However, to hear Gordon Brown speak of the need to confront this threat as a community, and his refusal to descend to the old rhetoric which demonised and singled out one sector of British society, was not only refreshing but also gave impetus to the leaders of the Muslim community and wider society in adopting a unified stand in condemning any threat to our country.”

BMI press release, 4 July 2007