‘Islam’s seeds of self-destruction’

“Any religion that wants to survive goes through change even if it means, as in the case of Christianity’s Reformation, a period of warfare and division. Once there was the Roman Church. Then there was the Roman and Eastern Church. Then, following the Reformation, there were numerous interpretations of Christianity spawning Protestantism’s diversity of churches.

“Judaism, the rock on which both Christianity and Islam is built, is over 3.5 thousand years old. It has survived because its spiritual leaders found ways for it to adapt to changing times. In each generation, Jews turned to the wisest among them to ask what adaptations were acceptable and these were assimilated into their lives allowing them to live in many different cultures and nations.

“Islam, however, leaves no room for real change. A modern Muslim must either cast a blind eye to its many strictures or must yield, willingly or not, to laws that are applicable to the seventh century, but which conflict with life in the twenty-first. It has produced a conflict being violently played out in nations throughout the Middle East where Islam has failed to advance freedom, enlightenment, equality, human rights, and tolerance.”

Alan Caruba at Progressive Conservative, 29 July 2004

Distorted MEMRI

“Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, who is currently visiting the UK, is one of the most prominent clerics of Sunni Islam, and is among the top spiritual leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood movement. He is also a spiritual guide for many other Islamist organizations across the world, including supporters of Islamist terrorist organizations such as Al-Qa’ida.”

The Middle East Media Research Institute’s Special Report No.30 offers an “analysis” of Yusuf al-Qaradawi – who is, of course, one of Al-Qa’ida’s fiercest opponents.

Dhimmitude at the BBC: Qaradawi has ‘star status’

“Sheikh Qaradawi is speaking in London. Some are, well, offended at his approval of suicide bombings and affiliation with the Mother of All Modern Terrorist Groups, the ‘peaceful’ Muslim Brotherhood. But don’t they realize that he has ‘star status’? This virtual puff piece from the BBC tells us so.”

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch defends freedom and democracy … by attacking the BBC for interviewing Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

Dhimmi Watch, 8 July 2004

‘I am runner-up for an “Islamophobia” award’ – Pipes not happy

“In addition to terrorism and other forms of violence, the current war also involves a battle of ideas, with Islamist totalitarians on one side and their opponents on the other. To convince the undecided, each side tries to discredit the other. This is a battle I am intensely engaged in to show the true nature of the Islamist organizations.”

Daniel Pipes’ response to receiving one of the Islamic Human Rights Commission’s annual Islamophobia awards.

Daniel Pipes’ blog, 26 June 2004

Qaradawi in London

“Qaradawi, as I’ve written many times, is probably the leading moderate Islamist, and the most popular Islamist public intellectual, in the Arab world today…. Qaradawi, for all his Muslim Brotherhood roots, has spent the last few decades preaching a moderate, tolerant form of Islamism which places dialogue, toleration, and democracy at the center of Islamic political theory.”

US political scientist Abu Aardvark defends Yusuf al-Qaradawi against the outbreak of Islamophobic hysteria in the British press prompted by Dr al-Qaradawi’s visit to London.

See here and here.

A ‘Clash of Civilizations’, sending pink sparks flying?

“Will the phenomenon of a gay man successfully popularizing the rhetoric that pits ‘Islam’ (misrepresented as inherently and monolithically homophobic and misogynistic) against the ‘Western Civilization’ (made out to be inherently and monolithically feminist and pro-gay) remain unique to the Netherlands? Or will the Netherlands be a harbinger, as more white gay men, now integrated in the militaries and soon to gain the equal right to marriage in most rich industrialized nations, lose the ability to identify with other outcasts …? Take Peter Tatchell, perhaps the most famous queer activist in Britain, for example. Unlike Fortuyn, Tatchell is still capable of gesturing toward the existence of tolerant Muslims, but a number of his writings suggest a paranoid fear of political powers of Muslims.”

US radical activist Yoshie Furuhashi draws parallels between the late Dutch racist Pim Fortuyn and Peter Tatchell of Outrage! on her Critical Montages blog.

Khaled Abou El Fadl: ‘stealth Islamist’ (according to Daniel Pipes)

“Which Muslims in the West support Islamism, which do not? Those who have Al-Qaeda connections or deal in terrorism are relatively easy to classify, once they are found out. The state has ways to investigate and punish illegal activities…. But what about individuals who apparently break no laws but promote an Islamist agenda in a legal fashion, sometimes from within the heart of the establishment?”

Daniel Pipes attacks Dr Khaled Abou El Fadl, Professor of Law at UCLA and widely recognised as one of the most important and influential Islamic scholars today.

Spring 2004 issue of the Middle East Quarterly

Abu Aardvark comments: “Daniel Pipes has just published an attack on the Islamic scholar Khaled Abou el Fadl. This attack, even by his standards, is despicable.”

Hijab – no right to choose

“‘A Woman’s Right To Choose.’ This slogan, made famous by pro-abortion activists in the United States, now has a new meaning, as in ‘Hijab: A Woman’s Right To Choose’.

“That is the slogan for a conference coming up on July 12 in London, hosted by none other than the extreme left-wing mayor of that city, Ken Livingstone. The gradual takeover of the left by Islamists is something truly amazing to behold.”

Daniel Pipes’ blog, 7 July 2004