Why don’t we Muslims grow up?

Irshad Manji poses the question. Of course, when she says “we Muslims” she’s not talking about herself, just her co-religionists. She blames them for the outbreak of the sometimes violent protests provoked by the Newsweek report about desecration of the Qur’an at Guantánamo.

Times, 20 May 2005

Ramzy Baroud points out that the Times “made a clever choice when it selected a Muslim, Irshad Manji, to address the fierce response to the scandal”. By pinning blame on her fellow Muslims rather than on those responsible for the oppression that gave rise to the protests, Manji provided a useful alibi for imperialism.

Islam Online 22 May 2005

For the Muslim Council of Britain’s response – “It is hard not to conclude that Manji’s main interest is actually in provoking Muslims in order to promote herself and fatten her bank account” – see here.

Guantánamo comes to define US to Muslims

Guantanamo“Accounts of abuses at the actual American detention center at Guantánamo Bay, including Newsweek magazine’s now-retracted article on the desecration of the Koran, ricochet around the world, instilling ideas about American power and justice, and sowing distrust of the United States. Even more than the written accounts are the images that flash on television screens throughout the Muslim world: caged men, in orange prison jumpsuits, on their knees.”

New York Times, 21 May 2005

Australian law targets Muslims

Australia’s espionage chief has agreed with Muslim leaders that tough new laws seem to single out Muslims. However, Dennis Richardson, head of the Australian Security and Intelligence Organization, told the Joint Parliamentary Committee that he made no apology for it, the Herald Sun newspaper reported Friday.

UPI report, 20 May 2005

See also “ASIO chief defends anti-terror laws”, The Age, 20 May 2005

Robert Spencer applauds Richardson’s “refreshing directness and honesty”.

Dhimmi Watch, 21 May 2005

House resolution urges respect for Koran, condemns religious intolerance

An Islamic civil rights group is urging all “people of conscience” to support a Democrat-sponsored resolution recognizing that the Koran, like the holy book of any other religion, “should be treated with dignity and respect.” The resolution, to be introduced by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), also “condemns bigotry and intolerance against any religious group, including our friends, neighbors and citizens of the Islamic faith.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations called the introduction of the resolution a winning move. “This resolution expresses America’s respect for the holy texts of all faiths. If passed, it will also reiterate our nation’s condemnation of bigoted behavior and religious intolerance,” said Corey Saylor, CAIR’s government affairs director.

CNSNews, 19 May 2005

Robert Spencer denounces it as “shameless political pandering”. He demands: “Why does this need a House resolution? Why do desecrations of things cherished by other religions not inspire similar resolutions? Why does the House not say anything about the desecration of Christian and Jewish symbols in the Islamic world?”

Dhimmi Watch, 20 May 2005

Let’s blame everyone but the Muslims

“The latest whipping boy for the mess in Mesopotamia is Newsweek. According to one mullah over there, printing anything that might offend Muslims is sufficient reason for some of them to riot in the streets and end up killing one another. That is, when they are not blowing up each other’s mosques or innocent civilians in the marketplace.”

A comment on the Qur’an desecration scandal from the folks who almost make Robert Spencer look like the voice of reason.

FaithFreedom.org, 20 May 2005

The ‘democratic idealism’ of the US

“One recent Newsweek story alleged – or fabricated – that a single Koran was desecrated by an American soldier in Guantanamo Bay. The unsubstantiated rumor led to rioting and death in Afghanistan and general turmoil and rage across the Islamic world. Mullahs issued fatwas and the more lunatic even declared a ‘holy war’. What explains the unsubstantiated story and why the hysterical reaction?”

Victor Davis Hanson has the answer. It’s all due to “the increasing hatred of the United States and its policy of democratic idealism abroad”.

National Review, 20 May 2005

Koran ordered online contains hate slogans

A Culver City woman said Wednesday that a secondhand Koran she ordered through a book dealer working with Amazon.com contained anti-Islamic hate messages, including profanity and “Death to all Muslims!”

Azza Basarudin, a 30-year-old UCLA graduate student, said Amazon apologized, sent a new book and offered her a refund and gift certificate. But she and the Muslim Public Affairs Council called on the online bookseller to do more, including issuing a public condemnation of anti-Muslim hate speech and cutting commercial ties with the Pennsylvania-based book dealer that sent the Koran.

Holding up the book to display the messages at a news conference Wednesday, Basarudin said the incident resurrected the fear she felt after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, when anxiety about anti-Muslim sentiment made her reluctant to leave her apartment for two weeks.

“I was taken back to 9/11, my fear that somebody is going to hurt me,” Basarudin said at the Islamic Center of Southern California in Los Angeles.

Los Angeles Times, 19 May 2005

See also Islam Online, 19 May 2005

Friedman vs Huwaydi

Thomas Friedman in the New York Times (18 May 2005) denounces Muslims for their failure to take a stand against anti-Shia atrocities in Iraq: “… these mass murders – this desecration and dismemberment of real Muslims by other Muslims – have not prompted a single protest march anywhere in the Muslim world. And I have not read of a single fatwa issued by any Muslim cleric outside Iraq condemning these indiscriminate mass murders of Iraqi Shiites and Kurds by these jihadist suicide bombers.”

In reply, Marc Lynch quotes the Egyptian “New Islamist” Fahmy Huwaydi: “A strong Islamist condemnation is required … for the killing of Shia in Iraq … and for ignorant Salafism…. This has nothing to do with nationalist resistance … it is a form of terrorist crime which can not be justified in any way, and its criminal nature will never be changed by a statement or a fatwa issued by Abu Musab al Zarqawi condemning Shi’ites.”

“Of course”, Lynch comments, “Huwaydi’s piece wasn’t translated by MEMRI, so for Tom Friedman his article does not exist.”

Abu Aardvark, 18 May 2005

In the discussion that followed, Lynch added that earlier condemnations of attacks on civilians in Iraq, by Huwaydi’s co-thinker Yusuf al-Qaradawi, “had some real effect on Zarqawi’s activities – which helps proves Friedman’s point that such denunciations are important, but cuts against his ‘there are no denunciations’ point”.