Cummins & Co

“It could hardly be more embarrassing: the British Council, charged with promoting British values throughout the world, is forced to fire a senior press officer this week after he penned an extraordinary series of attacks on Islam.

“For those who doubt the very concept of Islamophobia, the columns of Will, aka Harry, Cummins in the Sunday Telegraph should be a set text. His brand of virulent paranoia combines racism – ‘all Muslims, like all dogs, share certain characteristics’ – with a particularly vicious aggression – the massacres in Bosnia were ‘more a tribute to (Muslims’) incompetence than their humanity’.

“This is very nasty stuff and one wouldn’t want to give it more space in another newspaper but for the fact that there is still a well-meaning, but fatally blind strand of opinion which refuses to accept the phenomenon of Islamophobia. Refuses to see how it represents a mutated form of racism, and refuses to see how such comments about Jews or blacks would be quite rightly regarded as unprintable.

“What makes the Cummins case so disturbing is that he didn’t lurk in the backroom of British National party offices, writing Nick Griffin’s speeches. No, he was at the very heart of a quintessential British institution. It exposes, in a way which can no longer be denied, how deep the worm of Islamophobia has crawled.”

Madeleine Bunting in the Guardian, 4 September 2004

‘Islam critic’ sacked by British Council

The British Council sacked a senior officer yesterday after investigating allegations that he wrote articles in The Sunday Telegraph that criticised Islam.

The government-funded body, which promotes cultural relations, said that it had dismissed an employee, believed to be Harry Cummins, a long-serving press officer. The investigation followed the publication of four articles written under the pseudonym Will Cummins.

In the pieces, which were attacked by Islamic organisations, Will Cummins said that Muslim voters had a “global jihad agenda”.

In one he said: “Christians are the original inhabitants and rightful owners of almost every Muslim land and behave with a humility quite unlike the menacing behaviour we have come to expect from the Muslims who have forced themselves on Christendom.”

The British Council has distanced itself from the content of the articles. “From the British Council point of view, it has been a pretty distressing and damaging period and we are still digesting the consequences,” a spokesman said.

The Sunday Telegraph declined to comment.

Daily Telegraph, 2 September 2004

UK Muslims call for sacking of Telegraph editor

Britain’s largest Muslim group called yesterday for the sacking of the Sunday Telegraph newspaper’s editor over a series of articles attacking “the black heart of Islam”.

The author of four opinion pieces in the traditionally conservative newspaper described Islam as a “supranationalist army and state” and compared Muslims to dogs.

A media hunt for the author, who penned his views under a pseudonym, led to the communications office in London of the British Council, a state-funded body that aims to promote British culture abroad.

The British Council said yesterday it had sacked the author of the articles, Harry Cummins. The MCB, an umbrella body for over 400 Muslim groups, called for the Telegraph Group to follow suit by sacking editor Dominic Lawson.

“We are dismayed that the Telegraph Group have yet to take any action against the editor of the Sunday Telegraph,” said the MCB’s Abdul Bari in a statement.

One article said Britain feared Islam. “It is the black heart of Islam, not its black face, to which millions object,” Cummins wrote.

Continue reading

Daniel Pipes and Tariq Ramadan

“Readers of my previous comment on Tariq Ramadan will no doubt have come away with the impression that I don’t much like Daniel Pipes. This is not an entirely accurate assessment of my opinion of him. I think Pipes is an unreconstructed bigot and xenophobic fanatic whose academic work fails to meet even the lowest standards of scholarship, whose career has been built on politically driven attacks, and who has set up with his ‘Campus Watch’ as a terrorist front designed to intimidate academics and ensure that there is as little debate, discussion or rational thought on Israel, US foreign policy or Islam as possible. His research and scholarship are not intended to better inform action but to support specific agendas, usually revolving around hating some foreign force or people. Instead of fostering debate, his work is intended to intimidate. Pipes advocates religiously targetted surveillance, he supports making federal university funding conditional on ideology, and he has helped to terrorise professors who are named on his website. In short, I think Pipes is swine.”

Scott Martens demolishes Daniel Pipes.

Fistful of Euros, 31 August 2004

Scholar under siege defends his record: Tariq Ramadan refutes Daniel Pipes

“The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, without offering an explanation, has revoked a visa that was granted to me to teach at the University of Notre Dame. In Sunday’s Chicago Tribune on the Commentary page, Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, provided his ‘explanation’ for this action. In what follows I respond to his unfounded allegations.”

Tariq Ramadan in the Chicago Tribune, 31 August 2004

Continue reading

British Council official in anti-Muslim row

Muslim groups and individuals have flooded the British Council with complaints after learning that one of its senior press officers allegedly wrote controversial Sunday Telegraph articles attacking “the black heart of Islam”.

The government-funded body, which recently commissioned a handbook on Islam “to prevent ignorant comments about Muslims being made in [the] national press”, has suspended Harry Cummins while it investigates the claims, which were first disclosed in the Guardian Diary.

He denies writing the articles, which have prompted calls for the Press Complaints Commission to intervene. They appeared under the byline “Will Cummins”, which the Sunday Telegraph later described as a pseudonym.

Muslim organisations say the comment pieces incite racial and religious hatred, and the British Council describes the articles as deeply offensive.

But the Sunday Telegraph has refused to rule out publishing further contributions from the author of the articles. Its editor, Dominic Lawson, told the Guardian that he did not regret printing them.

Guardian, 6 August 2004

Church leader criticises Islam

A religious leader from Norwich was today widely condemned after he branded the Islamic faith “evil”.

Rev Alan Clifford, pastor of the Norwich Reformed Church, waded into the controversy surrounding anti-Muslim remarks made by the British National Party in an undercover BBC documentary.

Today, religious and race leaders in Norwich condemned his backing of claims that Islam is “a monster in our midst”.

Continue reading

‘Islam’s seeds of self-destruction’

“Any religion that wants to survive goes through change even if it means, as in the case of Christianity’s Reformation, a period of warfare and division. Once there was the Roman Church. Then there was the Roman and Eastern Church. Then, following the Reformation, there were numerous interpretations of Christianity spawning Protestantism’s diversity of churches.

“Judaism, the rock on which both Christianity and Islam is built, is over 3.5 thousand years old. It has survived because its spiritual leaders found ways for it to adapt to changing times. In each generation, Jews turned to the wisest among them to ask what adaptations were acceptable and these were assimilated into their lives allowing them to live in many different cultures and nations.

“Islam, however, leaves no room for real change. A modern Muslim must either cast a blind eye to its many strictures or must yield, willingly or not, to laws that are applicable to the seventh century, but which conflict with life in the twenty-first. It has produced a conflict being violently played out in nations throughout the Middle East where Islam has failed to advance freedom, enlightenment, equality, human rights, and tolerance.”

Alan Caruba at Progressive Conservative, 29 July 2004