Norway: Progress Party official claimed the Qur’an makes Muslims mentally ill and potentially violent

Trond RedThe month of Ramadan came into full effect last week, and followers of Islam must be truly amazed by what Norway has been saying about them. In a week when the Progress Party has been put under scrutiny due to Carl I. Hagen’s “most terrorists are Muslims” comments, FrP are dealing with more criticism today.

It has been revealed that Trond Røed, respected leader of the Buskerud region, was forced to apologise after admitting to sending out an eleven-page document to almost 100 party members in 2004. Contained in it are suggestions that people who follow Islam must be “deprogrammed” using psychiatric help, as well as arguments for imposing a veto on further preaching of their faith.

VG alleges the document consists of several highly controversial statements about Islam and Muslims, including one that alleges repeating certain Qur’an verses could lead to indoctrination leading to tendencies that are more violent.

“One should therefore question whether hour-long Qur’an citations over many years can cause serious psychological damage, with a consequent risk of committing criminal and destructive acts. Another question is whether it is possible to establish suitable psychiatric treatment institutions that can carry out the deprogramming,” one paragraph read.

Mr Røed also believed this document could be a useful contribution towards the Progress Party’s immigration policy views, alleging Islam has strong connections with violence.

Muslim Anne Sofie Roald, a Norwegian-born professor and Islam researcher at the Christian Michelsen Institute, says his statements indicate “a lack of history”. “Even though Islam has more of a political background, Christianity has been used politically and is, amongst other things, used for such purposes in the U.S. today,” she says, “not to mention in a politically violent manner under the Crusades.”

Trond Røed has since apologised for his actions, telling VG “I don’t stand for what I said then any longer, regret sending it and that I didn’t conduct better research at the time”. He has refused to comment on the matter further.

The Foreigner, 17 August 2011

Michigan: opponents decry anti-Sharia bill as racist

Rashida Tlaib and Dawud WalidDetroit — Prominent Muslim leaders and others on Tuesday announced their opposition to a bill to ban “foreign laws” in Michigan, calling the measure a racist attack on Islam.

State Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Harvey Santana, D-Detroit, joined activists at a press conference outside Cadillac Place in Midtown to denounce a bill sponsored by Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, to outlaw state courts from implementing foreign laws, including Sharia, or Islamic law.

“I’m appalled as the first Muslim woman serving in the Michigan legislation,” Tlaib said. “This is taking a community and casting suspicion on them … targeting them, and it’s completely wrong. It’s racism at its core.”

Santana said the bill “polarizes people based on fear”. “Dave Agema has a history of making bigoted comments,” Santana said.

Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, attended the event Tuesday and said his group plans to file a lawsuit if the legislation is passed. A House committee has yet to take up the bill.

Darnell White, the interim director of the Detroit Branch NAACP said, “We have too many issues – jobs, (home) foreclosures – to be focused on this”. “This is wrong and we denounced this type of legislation,” White said at Tuesday’s news conference.

Detroit News, 16 August 2011

See also MLive.com, 16 August 2011

Complaint to Charity Commission over Barnabas Fund’s ‘Islamisation’ booklet

Barnabas Fund Slippery SlopeThe Charity Commission has received a complaint about a charity that is campaigning against the “Islamisation of the UK”.

The commission said concerns had been raised about the Barnabas Fund, which is selling a booklet it has produced called Slippery Slope: the Islamisation of the UK.

The Barnabas Fund offers financial support to projects around the world that help Christians suffering oppression and persecution “as a consequence of their faith”.

The booklet claims that DVDs featuring radical preachers are “widely disseminated” in mosques and says that on one such DVD a speaker argues that “if a girl refuses to wear the hijab, she should be hit”. It also claims that radical Muslim preachers say “women are created with deficient intellect”.

A commission spokeswoman said: “Concerns have been raised with us regarding the Barnabas Fund after recent media coverage of a booklet produced by the charity. We are currently considering the issues raised to determine what, if any, regulatory interest there is for the commission.”

Continue reading

Pamela Geller hails the Middle East Media Research Institute

Geller on MEMRI

Over at Atlas Shrugs, Pamela Geller reports: “MEMRI does an excellent report on the sweeping global movement to Islamicize the world and compel all peoples to live under Islamic law – the sharia (the imperialistic goal of Islam).” And she reproduces in its entirety a lengthy analytical study by MEMRI which begins:

“Over recent years, a new phenomenon has emerged among radical Islamist circles: the rise of a global network of groups calling for the total Islamization of Western states and societies via the implementation of shari’a law and the abolition of democratic states and their replacement by Islamic regimes. These groups, which have referred to themselves as the global shari’a movement, strive to globalize ideas and tactics hatched within radical Salafi circles in the U.K.”

And what is this “global network of groups” to which MEMRI thinks it appropriate to devote such an in-depth study? It consists of the minuscule sects inspired by Anjem Choudary! Even MEMRI itself admits: “It would seem that the only group outside Britain with a sizeable presence on the ground is Shariah4belgium.” And the “sizeable presence on the ground” that Choudary’s organisation enjoys in the UK may be gauged by the fact that a recent demonstration in London in support of his ludicrous campaign for Sharia law attracted a mere 50 participants. In other words, the “global network of groups” that MEMRI depicts as representing some sort of serious danger to western democracy is just a fantasy.

But this is par for the course with MEMRI. It is a hardline right-wing Zionist organisation whose purpose is to defend the state of Israel by presenting Islam as a threat to the West and thereby marginalising Muslims – who, of course, overwhelmingly support the Palestinian cause. So popular mainstream figures like Yusuf al-Qaradawi are depicted as dangerous maniacs by MEMRI and irrelevant buffoons like Anjem Choudary are portrayed as representing significant forces within the Muslim community. Much of MEMRI’s “research” is little more than an exercise in fiction. No wonder Geller takes the view that “MEMRI is the most vital source of news from the Middle East. Hands down.”

And this is the organisation that has just been granted $200,000 by the US State Department.

ADL leader poses ‘danger to the fabric of US society’

Abe Foxman ADLOver at the American Thinker the one-time Jihad Watch collaborator Andrew Bostom (he and Robert Spencer have since fallen out) takes issue with Abe Foxman’s recent JTA op ed condemning the spread of Sharia hysteria in the US. According to Bostom:

“Abraham Foxman’s latest uninformed rant, ‘Shout down the Sharia myth makers’, re-affirms his nonpareil status as the most blindly agenda-driven organizational Jewish ‘leader’. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL)’s Foxman sprays defamatory charges – rooted in willful ignorance – against all those legitimately concerned with the ceaseless efforts of mainstream institutional American Islam to insinuate Sharia mores and jurisdiction into US society.”

Bostom’s conclusion? Foxman and his views “pose an unacceptable danger to the fabric of US society”.

Oslo mayoral candidate says terrorists are mainly Muslims

Carl HagenAs the local elections take place in Norway next month, politicians are said to lead their campaigns in a peaceful fashion after what happened in Utøya Island and at Oslo City Centre last month. However, some go that extra mile and cause further controversy.

Former Chairman of the Progress Party (FrP) Carl I. Hagen, who is running for Oslo Mayor, has continued his series of contentious remarks, saying most terrorists are Muslims, reports NRK.

Releasing his Party’s manifesto in 2005, he was quoted byAftenposten as criticising the foreigners in Norway, branding them as “perpetrators”. Already in 2004 he was censured for his controversial views of Islam, after he alleged that its extreme faction planned to Islamify the world.

Standing by what he said at the time, Mr Hagen tells Aftenpostentoday: “We had seen regular reports about suicide bombers down to 10-years old in the Middle East. What I said was when holding my speech was just a correct description.”

Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre was first to respond to Hagen’s recent comments, calling them “grotesque”, particularly when the country is still in mourning about Anders Behring Breivik’s twin massacres on July 22.

“The Progress Party has a tendency to talk about Muslims as large groups, giving them the features and characteristics because they are Muslims. Carl I. Hagen is repeating his message. He says that not all Muslims are terrorists, but almost that all terrorists are Muslims. I think it is a grotesque statement. It was then, and is especially today after what we have experienced in Norway.”

According to the Minister of Children, Equality, and Social Inclusion, Audun Lysbakken: “The Progress Party has talked about Islam and Muslims in a way that creates the impression they are a team with specific values ​​and attitudes that do not fit in Norway. It has a responsibility for the attitudes expressed against Muslims in the hours when many thought that Muslims were behind the terror attacks.”

The Foreigner, 15 August 2011

Will the NSS end its association with David Starkey?

NSSWriting at The Third Estate, Reuben R draws our attention to the fact that David Starkey, under fire over his disgraceful racist contribution to a Newsnight debate on the riots last week, is an Honorary Associate of the National Secular Society.

Reuben asks whether the NSS will now sever its links with Starkey. Unlikely, I would say, given the past record of the organisation.

Continue reading

Michigan bill targets Sharia

A state lawmaker wants Michigan to join the trend of states banning “foreign laws”, but Muslim activists say the effort is a thinly veiled attack on Islam.

Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, is pushing a bill to bar the implementation of foreign laws. It doesn’t mention Sharia – Islamic law – but he acknowledged it would be prohibited in courts under the legislation intended to prevent anyone “who tries to shove any foreign law down our throats”.

“No foreign law shall supersede federal laws or constitution or state laws or constitution,” Agema said. “Our law is our law. I don’t like foreign entities telling us what to do.” Agema said his bill would protect the “vast majority” of Muslims, whom he contended “come to this country to get away from Sharia”.

The legislation comes at a time of heightened debate about Sharia, a set of religious rules governing personal conduct, family relationships and religious practice for Muslims. Critics fear Sharia could supersede civil law and have an impact on divorce and child custody cases, and similar legislation has been introduced in 25 states.

Some say the bills are unnecessary and pander to anti-Muslim paranoia. “Agema … is a reflection of a segment of the GOP that is openly xenophobic and Islamophobic,” said Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Michigan chapter.

State Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, plans to speak out about the bill during a press conference Tuesday in Midtown. Victor Begg, a prominent Republican and co-founder of the Council of Islamic Organizations of Michigan, called the bill “appalling”. “Some in our party find it politically opportune to target my faith by sponsoring an innocuous sounding bill, knowing well that their intent is so-called ‘creeping Sharia,'” Begg said.

Agema called the criticism “hogwash”. “If anybody has a problem with this that means they don’t agree with U.S. laws,” he said. “If they don’t want it passed then they have an ulterior agenda.”

Detroit News, 13 August 2011

New York congressional election: Republican candidate resurrects ‘Ground Zero mosque’ controversy to attack Democratic opponent

In a special election to take place just two days after the 10th anniversary of 9/11, the GOP candidate running to fill former Rep. Anthony Weiner’s seat attacked his Democratic opponent for supporting the “Ground Zero mosque” last year.

Republican businessman Bob Turner released a TV ad Thursday, juxtaposing video of the burning World Trade Center with images of President Barack Obama. Turner blasted his opponent, Democrat David Weprin, for siding with the president on the issue.

“It’s been ten short years. Everyone remembers,” the ad says, with dreary music playing over images of smoke billowing from the World Trade Center. “Some, though, want to commemorate the tragedy by building a mosque on Ground Zero.”

The ad then says the president “thinks it’s a good idea,” as a photo of a smiling Obama appears next to a photo of a mosque, as well as video of the Twin Towers on 9/11. “And so does Congressional candidate David Weprin,” the ad says.

The ad then plays a soundbite of Weprin saying in a 2010 debate that he supported those who wanted to build the Cordoba House, an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from Ground Zero. Protests over the project spilled over into a national controversy last summer. “But Bob Turner says ‘no’,” the ad says. “He knows Weprin and Obama are wrong.”

CNN, 12 August 2011

Needless to say, Bob Turner enjoys the enthusiastic backing of mad Pamela Geller:

“Turner is going to need our help. And I like what he is saying. Gutsy! … Bob Turner opposes the Ground Zero mosquestrosity. It takes courage to take this stand publicly, although the overwhelming majority of Americans oppose this cultural obscenity…. We must support candidates who have the poltical [sic] will to stand up for America and against the leftist/Islamic machine.”