We need to listen to the man from special branch

Ken with Qaradawi“Last week, as the archbishop’s sharia storm raged, Gordon Brown banned the leading Islamic cleric Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi from the country. The pretext given was his support for Palestinian suicide attacks during the intifada. But the 81-year-old scholar has been to Britain several times since then – in fact he was encouraged to come by the government after the Iraq invasion because of his opposition to al-Qaida.

“The real reason for the ban, apart from the competition to appear tough on terror, is his links with the Muslim Brotherhood, the most influential Islamist organisation in the Arab world – but also a particular target for liberal hawks and neoconservatives. They have played a key role in convincing the government to end its engagement with mainstream Islamist groups and sponsor more pliant Muslim bodies.

“One man who thinks that’s not just bad for community relations but actually a threat to Britain’s security, is Detective Inspector Bob Lambert, who retired six weeks ago as head of the Metropolitan police special branch’s Muslim Contact Unit. With more than a quarter century at the sharp end of counter-terrorism operations, Lambert is scarcely a bleeding-heart liberal. But he has been unable to speak out publicly until now and is deeply frustrated by the Qaradawi ban. ‘Qaradawi is clearly useful in countering al-Qaida propaganda’, Lambert told me this week. ‘He is held in high esteem: how can we think meaningfully about enlisting credible Muslim community support against al-Qaida if we’re not prepared to engage constructively with the likes of Qaradawi?’

“Lambert also highlights the importance of Islamic activists’ cooperation with the anti-war movement and radical MPs such as Jeremy Corbyn and George Galloway in offering Muslim youth a way to channel their political grievances into peaceful political action. This isn’t about ‘political correctness or deference to Islamist thinking’, he insists, ‘it’s a genuine issue of London’s safety’. Groups now promoted by the government, such as the Sufi Muslim Council, may have their role, but from the perspective of countering terrorism they have ‘neither religious nor political credibility. Let’s be clear who it is that can keep London safe in the runup to the Olympic games’.”

Seumas Milne in the Guardian, 14 February 2008

For the FCO’s 2005 briefing on Qaradawi, which echoes Bob Lambert’s view, see (pdf) here

Austrian state bans mosques

VIENNA — The southernmost Austrian state of Carinthia has passed a law effectively banning the construction of mosques, drawing fire from the opposition and Muslims for religious freedom violations.

“I can only recommend to all to have the courage to stand up effectively against this Islamisation that is creeping through Europe and represents a totally different culture,” Governor Joerg Haider was quoted as saying by Reuters. “We are really the pioneers on this,” added Haider, also the leader of the far-right Alliance for the Future of Austria party.

The law requires plans for any building of “extraordinary architecture or size” to be approved by a commission to judge its compatibility with the standard look of towns. This means that mosques would stand little chance of permits.

The new law drew immediate rebuke from the opposition and Muslims alike.

“We are creating a law for something that doesn’t exist,” fumed provincial Social Democratic leader Gaby Schaunig. Schaunig said there was no request to build a mosque in the overwhelmingly Roman Catholic province.

Carinthia is home to 11,000 Muslims out of an estimated 400,000 population, the second-lowest Muslim population in Austria. Muslims, estimated at 400,000 or nearly 4 percent of the population, also denounced the law.

Omar Al-Rawi, the spokesman for Austria’s Islamic community, said it violated principles of equality and religious freedom and put Austria’s reputation on the line.

Islam Online, 13 February 2008

9/11 case pilot can claim damages

Belmarsh HMPA pilot wrongly accused of training the 9/11 hijackers is entitled to claim damages, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Judges said evidence suggested “serious defaults” in the decision to detain Lotfi Raissi in prison for nearly five months after a US extradition request. The ruling means the government has to reconsider the 33-year-old’s claim for compensation, which it had refused.

Speaking after the judgement, Mr Raissi, of west London, said he had suffered a miscarriage of justice, and had now been “completely exonerated. I am very glad. I always had faith in British justice. Surely I can expect to hear from the home secretary with the long-awaited apology very soon.”

He said his wrongful arrest had left him blacklisted as a pilot and unable to work. “They destroyed my life, they destroyed my career. For this I will never, ever forgive them,” he said.

BBC News, 14 February 2008

It’s all very well to be sensitive to Islam, but …

“There may no longer be much in the way of ideological enthusiasm for what can be described as multiculturalism. But in practice it gathers pace anyway, and there remains an unwillingness to take even a normative stance against it. Tony Blair may have declared that he considered the veil to be ‘a sign of separation’. But there is little sign of any appetite for issuing any formal guidance that might suggest that such dress is not in keeping with the values and aspirations of modern British life.”

Deborah Orr in the Independent, 13 February 2008

Orr’s sentiments are enthusiastically endorsed by Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch.

Stab woman made ‘terrorist’ claim

Mary McKayA 32-year-old woman who stabbed an Asian teenager she called a terrorist has been jailed for six years.

At the High Court in Edinburgh, Mary McKay admitted attempting to murder Tarik Husan, 17, in Tollcross Road, Glasgow, on 10 September, 2007.

Lord Menzies said: “It seems to me this was a completely unprovoked attack on an unarmed stranger in the public street without any explainable motive.”

McKay will be supervised for two years after her release.

She stabbed Mr Husan in the chest and arm at a bus stop in Glasgow and told him “you’re all terrorists”. McKay, who had taken cocaine, later claimed she had gone to stab her mother, but had missed the bus and stabbed Mr Husan instead.

The court heard that after the attack she walked into a shop still clutching the knife and waited for the police to arrive. “I just stabbed a guy with the same colour of skin as a terrorist,” she later told police.

Mr Husan, 17, had only arrived in Scotland a short time before the attack.

BBC News, 13 February 2008

Mayor in Muslim row quits Tories

Robert BennettA town council mayor who claimed Muslims “cause mayhem with explosives” quit the Conservative party last night. Mirfield Mayor Clr Robert Bennett provoked outrage when comments he made about Islam in an email were leaked. Clr Bennett wrote in the email:

“I am aware Islamic organisations are keen to promote a view that they are peaceful, forward-thinking individuals who wish to integrate into the British way of life. The policy of clothing the feminine population of Dewsbury in black sack-like clothing from head to toe, the occasional trip out to cause mayhem with explosives and the proposal that all those of homosexual persuasion should be killed by shooting or other means is adequate and practical testimony to the level of progress being made in this direction.”

With an investigation into the leaked email under way, Clr Bennett told the town council: “I have decided to withdraw from membership of the Conservative party until such time as this matter is resolved.”

Clr Keith Sibbald, of Northorpe ward, spoke in the mayor’s defence. He said: “Those comments were intended to be off the cuff, but they have been taken up and used in an almost barbaric fashion by the Press.” Clr Sibbald went on to accuse Dewsbury MP Shahid Malik and the British National Party of using the controversy “to make political gain out of a private email”. Clr Sibbald then proposed a vote of confidence in Clr Bennett as mayor, which was passed.

Huddersfield Examiner, 13 February 2008

Five students win terror appeal

The convictions of five young Muslim men jailed over extremist literature have been quashed by the Appeal Court.

Freeing the men, the Lord Chief Justice said there was no proof of terrorist intent. The lawyer for one said they had been jailed for a “thought crime”.

A jury convicted them in 2007 after hearing the men, of Bradford University and Ilford, London, became obsessed with jihadi websites and literature.

Irfan Raja, Awaab Iqbal, Aitzaz Zafar, Usman Malik and Akbar Butt were jailed for between two and three years each by the Old Bailey for downloading and sharing extremist terrorism-related material, in what was one of the first cases of its kind.

But at the Court of Appeal, Lord Phillips said that while the men had downloaded such material, he doubted if there was evidence this was in relation to planning terrorist acts. He said the prosecution had attempted to use the law for a purpose for which it was not intended.

Lawyers for the men say the decision to restrict how the law on extremist literature works has huge implications for counter terrorism prosecutions.

Critics inside the Muslim community and civil liberty campaigners say section 57 of the 2000 Terrorism Act has been used as a blunt instrument to prosecute young Muslim men where there is no proof of genuine links to terrorism.

The BBC understands there have been three other convictions under this legislation – more cases are expected before the courts this year.

Imran Khan, solicitor for Mr Zafar, said the five had been prosecuted for “thought crime” and that the ruling would have an significant impact.

He told BBC News: “Young Muslim men before this judgement could have been prosecuted simply for simply looking at any material on the basis that it might be connected in some way to terrorist purposes.”

He said section 57 of the 2000 Terrorism Act had been written in such wide terms that “effectively, anybody could have been caught in it” but prosecutors would now have to prove such material was intended for terrorist purposes.

BBC News, 13 February 2008

Danish papers reprint Muhammad cartoon

Lars RefnCOPENHAGEN, Denmark — Denmark’s leading newspapers Wednesday reprinted a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad that triggered rioting in Muslim countries two years ago. The newspapers said they republished the cartoon to show their firm commitment to freedom of speech after the arrest Tuesday of three people accused of plotting to kill the man who drew the cartoon depicting the prophet wearing a turban shaped like a bomb with a lit fuse.

The Jyllands-Posten newspaper, which first published the drawings on Sept. 30, 2005, reprinted Westergaard’s cartoon in its paper edition Wednesday. Several other major dailies, including Politiken and Berlingske Tidende, also reprinted the drawing.”We are doing this to document what is at stake in this case, and to unambiguously back and support the freedom of speech that we as a newspaper will always defend,” said the Copenhagen-based Berlingske Tidende. Tabloid Ekstra Bladet reprinted all 12 drawings. At least three European newspapers – in Sweden, the Netherlands and Spain – also reprinted the cartoon as part of their coverage of the Danish arrests.

Intelligence police arrested two Tunisians and a Danish citizen of Moroccan origin in western Denmark on Tuesday for allegedly plotting to kill Westergaard. The Danish suspect was released Tuesday after questioning, his lawyer Henning Lyngsbo said.”He has no knowledge about the case,” Lyngsbo told The Associated Press. “It doesn’t seem that the evidence is very strong.”

Associated Press, 13 February 2008

Waltham Forest Muslims welcome Williams’ lecture

Members of mosques across the borough have condemned the way people reacted to the Archbishop of Canterbury’s comments on Sharia law. The Waltham Forest Council of Mosques said its members welcomed the Archbishop’s thoughtful lecture and wanted to thank him for stimulating a debate that would be beneficial for long-term community cohesion. And they said the fall-out from some quarters was a “hysterical, knee-jerk reaction”.

The council, representing eight local mosques, said Muslims in the borough wanted to live in harmony with the wider community and did not seek to impose their beliefs on anyone else. But they want to have the option to apply Sharia judgements in issues like marriage, divorce, inheritance and financial agreements and abide by the tenets of their faith.

A Sharia court in Francis Road, Leyton, has been doing just that for Muslims across London and the south east since the 1980s. An advisor at the council, Usama Hasan, who is also a Leyton Imam, said the Islamic Sharia Council gets between 50 and 100 new enquiries a week, mainly from British-born Muslims wanting advice about divorce.

He added that the council exists primarily to help Muslim women trapped in marriage. Although they can apply to divorce legally under English law, under Islam they cannot remarry unless the man agrees to a divorce under Sharia, or a Sharia court rules them divorced. Dr Hasan highlighted that a similar condition in Jewish law has already been incorporated into English law and that far from increasing repression as some critics have claimed, they were doing the opposite.

Waltham Forest Guardian, 13 February 2008