Pope Benedict and holy war

Daniel Johnson“Yesterday, the pope insisted that he did not agree with Manuel. But it is clear that he sympathized with this monarch of a doomed Christian civilization enough to use him as a mouthpiece through which he could pose his own implicit questions to Islam. Does the Muslim understanding of Allah allow rational debate about the morality of violence, given that the doctrine of jihad is a central pillar of Islam? If Allah is above reason, might violent jihad, including terrorism, be not merely justifiable but obligatory, as many Muslim scholars argue?

“By now, the answer to these questions is clear: churches firebombed in the West Bank and Gaza, a nun murdered in Somalia. Such persecution is, alas, routine in many Muslim lands, and Catholics are not the only victims. But it is clear that Muslim leaders – even those of ‘pro-Western’ countries such as Turkey or Pakistan – are not yet ready for the ‘frank’ dialogue proposed by the pope. By pointing out that violence is a part of medieval Islam, not a ‘distortion’, as Western liberals like to think, Benedict has touched a raw nerve.

“No, this pope is not naïve. It is our liberal, theologically illiterate politicians who are naïve. We are already at war – a holy war, which we may lose.”

Daniel Johnson in the New York Sun, 18 September 2006

Once again, Melanie Phillips rallies to the defence of western civilisation

madmelSurprise, surprise – Mad Mel sides with Pope Benedict: “the Pope’s real crime surely lay in speaking a truth that is denied by the many who claim that Islam is a religion of peace. On the contrary, Islam does indeed have a long history of imposing its faith on the world by the sword.”

Unlike European Christians, of course, who have spread their faith across the world by purely pacifistic means.

Mel concludes with a dire warning: “Our greatest danger comes from those in the West who … have mentally surrendered to the irrationality and false logic of those who accuse the West of aggression simply because it defends itself against Islamic holy war. This surrender has already resulted in a degree of self-censorship and back-to-front thinking, with accusations of ‘Islamophobia’ hurled at those telling the truth about the violence practised by some Muslims in the name of Islam.

“If we are ever to defeat the global jihad against free societies, it is vital to tell that truth – that it is the West that is under attack. It is in that context that the Pope’s remarks must be seen – defending Christianity and western civilisation from an onslaught that has not just snuffed out many innocent lives, but seeks to snuff out freedom and truth itself.”

Daily Mail, 18 September 2006

Blame ‘grievance-nurturing multiculturalism’ for Muslim outrage at Pope

“The combination of grievance-nurturing multiculturalism and instant headlines is having a disastrous effect on the worldwide Muslim community. There seems to be no limit to its spokesmen’s willingness to voice outrage; and their messages are then picked up by fanatics who mount appalling attacks on Christians in Muslim countries. When was the last time a Muslim leader apologised for such atrocities?

“The truth is that barbaric attacks happen weekly. No wonder that Benedict favours an urgent dialogue with Muslims on the subject of religious violence, rather than the usual touchy-feely exchange of compliments…. We suspect that Western public opinion is not displeased that Benedict has said the unsayable. Now it is time for other churchmen to tell their Muslim counterparts that, in addition to dishing out criticism, they must learn how to take it.”

Editorial in the Daily Telegraph, 18 September 2006

Over at Jihad Watch, Robert Spencer welcomes these “trenchant words from the Telegraph”.

‘The passing of a great lady’ – fascists pay tribute to Fallaci

forzaThe British National Party mourns the passing of a co-thinker:

It [is] with deep sadness that we announce the death of of Oriana Fallaci who lost her protracted battle with breast cancer on September 15, 2006….

“Her books ‘The Pride and the Rage’ and ‘The Force of Reason’ remain essential reading not just for what they say, but also for the passion and courage with which she expressed those views. This combination of intellect and bravery is the sine qua non of effective resistance to the islamification of the West.

With the last of her strength she defied not just the civilisational transformation of Europe into Eurabia, but also all those venal liberals who were prosecuting her in her native country of Italy for daring to defy this process. In time history will adjudge her one of Europe’s great patriots, a staunch defender of our Western heritage, art, culture, values and liberties.

“It with great regret we mark [her] passing, but it is with honour and pride that we shall remember her.”

BNP news article, 18 September 2006

We cannot afford to maintain these ancient prejudices against Islam

Karen Armstrong (3)“Pope Benedict delivered his controversial speech in Germany the day after the fifth anniversary of September 11. It is difficult to believe that his reference to an inherently violent strain in Islam was entirely accidental. He has, most unfortunately, withdrawn from the interfaith initiatives inaugurated by his predecessor, John Paul II, at a time when they are more desperately needed than ever. Coming on the heels of the Danish cartoon crisis, his remarks were extremely dangerous. They will convince more Muslims that the west is incurably Islamophobic and engaged in a new crusade. We simply cannot afford this type of bigotry.”

Karen Armstrong in the Guardian, 18 September 2006

See also Giles Fraser’s piece in Saturday’s Guardian: “the Pope has form on all of this. Just a few months before he was elected, he spoke out against Muslim Turkey joining the EU. Christian Europe must be defended, he argued. It didn’t go down well at the time with Muslim leaders. But what makes his comments from Bavaria doubly insensitive is that Munich and its surrounding towns are home to thousands of Gastarbeiter, many from Turkey, who are often badly treated by local Germans and frequently subjected to racism. It won’t be lost on them that Manuel II ran his Christian empire from what is now the Turkish city of Istanbul. And reference to that time, in circumstances such as these, has the unmistakable whiff of Christian triumphalism.”

Guardian, 16 September 2006

Stand up, stand up for Jesus (against the Muslim hordes)

Two Christians write in to support Olga Craig’s article in last week’s Sunday Telegraph:

“Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, etc, have lived among us peacefully for years, never threatening to blow up innocent people; neither have they made other demands. On the other hand, Muslims are always demanding special favours for their culture, while assuming a victim mentality. It also seems that only Muslims have freedom of speech; all others are silenced by the police.”

Sunday Telegraph, 17 September 2006

‘Violence is Muslim response to Pope’s speech’ – BNP

“Smooth talking ‘moderate’ Muslims try to convince us non-believers that Islam is the religion of peace, a task made impossible by their co-religionists who have not heeded the peace message. In response to a quote made by Pope Benedict XVI in a speech on Tuesday Muslims have been busy burning effigies of the Pope and burning down churches, hardly the response of those who practice a religion of peace….

“The West is constantly asked to tolerate the presence of this pre-medieval desert faith but its practitioners have no understanding of tolerance themselves, no concept of free speech which allows comment and criticism of any faith, cult or political ideology, a concept which itself is in peril due to Marxist inspired political correctness and supine liberal appeasement to the fifth column of Muslims already here in the UK and in countries across western Europe.”

BNP news article, 16 September 2006

Chief rabbi blasts multiculturalism, calls on Muslims to integrate

A crisis of national and social identity is undermining Britain’s efforts to integrate its immigrant population, according to the Chief Rabbi. Sir Jonathan Sacks told The Sunday Telegraph that multiculturalism had led to segregation and a country that was no longer confident of what it stood for.

The Chief Rabbi echoed the call last week by the Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, for Muslims to do more to integrate. Sir Jonathan said that the Islamic community, particularly second-generation Muslims, were struggling with “a conflicted identity”.

Continue reading

‘Pope sorry for offending Muslims’

Pope 2Pope Benedict XVI has apologised in person for causing offence to Muslims in a speech in Bavaria last week. He said the medieval text which he quoted did not express in any way his personal opinion, adding the speech was an invitation to respectful dialogue.

BBC News, 17 September 2006


And if you believe that – from the man who, not so long ago, held a private meeting with the late unlamented Oriana “Muslims breed like rats” Fallaci – you’ll believe anything.

Furthermore, the pope’s words – “I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims” – fall some way short of a full apology.

Still, you’d have thought his statement that the offensive words he quoted – “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached” – did not in any way express his personal opinion about Islam would be enough to win il papa a citation at Dhimmi Watch.

For comments by Osama Saeed at Rolled Up Trousers, see here and here.

Annual Islamophobia awards

It’s that time of year again. The Islamic Human Rights Commission announces the 2006 Islamophobia Awards:

“The Islamophobia Awards is an annual event to acknowledge – through satire, revue and comedy – the worst Islamophobes of that year. Centred around a gala dinner, the ‘awards’ themselves are both entertaining and raise awareness of a serious and growing prejudice. Real awards are given to those who have battled against Islamophobia – often against enormous odds.”

IHRC announcement, 17 September 2006

So it’s your chance to vote now for the Islamophobes of the year.