Britain ‘a soft touch for home grown terrorists’

Soft Touch UKBritain has become a “soft touch” for home grown terrorists because ministers have failed to tackle immigrant communities that refuse to integrate, warns a report released today.

The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), a body of the country’s leading military and diplomatic figures, says the loss of British values and national identity caused by “flabby and bogus” Government thinking has made the country vulnerable to attack from Islamic extremists.

“The UK presents itself as a target, as a fragmenting, post-Christian society,” the report says, and is “increasingly divided” on its history, national aims, values and political identity. “That fragmentation is worsened by the firm self-image of those elements within it who refuse to integrate.”

The report places most of the blame for this on a “lack of leadership from the majority, which, in misplaced deference to ‘multiculturalism’, failed to lay down the line to immigrant communities, thus undercutting those within them trying to fight extremism. The country’s lack of self-confidence is in stark contrast to the implacability of its Islamist terrorist enemy, within and without. We look like a soft touch. We are indeed a soft touch, from within and without.”

Daily Telegraph, 15 February 2008

See also Daily Mail, 15 February 2008

‘Yes to equal citizenship, no to double standards’

Yes to Equal Citizenship, No to Double Standards

Vigil outside 10 Downing Street

Saturday 16 February, 2-4pm

There come moments when it is important for fair-minded people to stand their ground. Now is a time for solidarity; to affirm respect, equality and parity for all Britons, irrespective of race and creed. Can it be good for Britain if a section of society – however small and socio-economically deprived – feels scape-goated and ostracised?

Following the Archbishop of Canterbury’s thoughtful address calling for a dialogue on shariah issues there have been appalling displays of prejudice and contempt towards Islam and Muslims. It is not a matter of being unduly sensitive to criticism, but rather a warning of the slippery slope from verbal mockery to physical intimidation. Do we really want Mosely’s Black Shirts back on the streets of Britain?

We are deeply troubled with the suggestion that it is somehow OK for a Muslim MP to be bugged because of the ‘war on terror’. We are worried by headlines like ‘Minister warns of inbreeding Muslims’. We are disturbed when an eminent Islamic scholar is denied entry to the UK. We are troubled that our concerns on issues of sacrilege are dismissed as an infringement on freedom of speech. It is no wonder that even in our schools, Muslim children highlight their fear of bullying more frequently than those from other faith groups. Is this the society of the future we want – one of first-class, confident citizens and second-class, anxiety-ridden citizens?

It is with these questions in mind that a number of civil society organisations have come together to stage a vigil outside No. 10 Downing Street on Saturday 16th February 2008 at 2pm, under the slogan ‘Yes to Equal Citizenship, No to Double Standards’.

For further information please contact BMI media office on 07786 257120 or email mediambi@gmailcom.

Download leaflet (pdf) here

Organised by:  British Muslim Initiative, Islamic Forum of Europe, Muslim Association of Britain, Islamic Human Right Commission, Da’watul Islam, Young Muslim Organisation UK, Muslimaat UK, The Cordoba Foundation, Centre for the Study of Terrorism, Friends of Al Aqsa, Palestinian Forum in Britain. IslamExpo, FOSIS, ICMG UK, Sri Lanka Islamic Forum UK, Algerian League in Britain, Council of Nigerian Muslim Organisations, Indian Muslim Federation, Jama’at Ahle Sunnat UK, Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association, Muslim Solidarity Committee, Muslim Welfare House Trust (London), Muslim Women Society (MWS), Muslim Women’s Association, The Council of European Jamaats, UK Action Committee on Islamic Affairs, UK Islamic Mission, UK Turkish Islamic Association, World Federation of KSIMC, World Islamic Mission

Top rabbi backs Williams on sharia

The head of one of Britain’s rabbinic courts this week rallied to the side of the embattled Archbishop of Canterbury over his controversial call to give greater recognition to Islamic law within Britain’s legal system. Dayan Yisroel Lichtenstein, head of the Federation Beth Din, writing in today’s JC, said that Rowan Williams had been “widely pilloried for proposing sensible ideas”, which would benefit the Jewish community if adopted.

Jewish Chronicle, 15 February 2008

Read Yisroel Lichtenstein’s article here.

Melanie Phillips begs to differ. In the same issue of the JC, she writes: “Jews are being used misleadingly to help promote a development which would ultimately hurt them very badly. The demand for sharia law is part of the pincer movement to Islamise Britain through both terrorism and cultural takeover.”

On the other hand Geoffrey Alderman, whose views Islamophobia Watch has not always endorsed, adopts a much more reasoned position.

Mad clergyman bashes Bish

Hat tip, as they say, to the fascists of the British National Party who have drawn our attention to a contribution from the Rev Alan Clifford to the Torygraph’s online debate over the question “Should the Archbishop of Canterbury resign?“:

Sir, May a case not be made that the Archbishop of Canterbury has betrayed his ordination and consecration vows (see below)? He is not called to be a ‘PC’ mouthpiece in a posture of appeasement towards Muslims, especially when the creeping Islamification of the UK is already making considerable progress. Dr Williams is not called to ‘explore’ the possible accommodation of aspects of shari’ah in a UK legal context but to declare the Word of God. According to his ‘penitential apology’ at the Church of England Synod, he completely misreads his duty to honour the Lordship of Christ in these (and other) areas. Christ said “Beware of false prophets” (Matt. 7:15), and who was more false than the Prophet Muhammad? The double standing ovation the Archbishop received was sickening to hear. Such is the apostasy of those who clapped.

I leave readers to judge the above remarks in the light of promises Dr Williams made at his consecration: ARE you ready, with all faithful diligence, to banish and drive away all erroneous and strange doctrine contrary to God’s Word; and both privately and openly to call upon and encourage others to the same? Answer: I am ready, the Lord being my helper.

The Form of Ordaining or Consecrating of an Archbishop or Bishop. The Book of Common Prayer(1662).

Yours faithfully,
The Revd Dr Alan C. Clifford
Pastor, Norwich Reformed Church
7 Woodside Park
Attleborough, NORWICH NR17 2JL

Muslims seeking Beth Din advice

The Islamic Sharia Council in London has held meetings with Jewish groups to learn about the Beth Din system as part of plans to develop a similar style of Muslim arbitration, TJ has learned.

Following the Archbishop of Canterbury’s remarks about allowing aspects of Sharia law in UK legislation, an advisor to the Islamic Sharia Council in Leyton told TJ this week that meetings have been held with the Three Faiths Forum and the Federation of Synagogue’s Beth Din over the last two years aimed at learning lessons from the Jewish experience.

The advisor, Dr Usama Hasan, also Director of Muslim network the City Circle, said there is a lot to learn from the Jews. He told TJ: “The issues are very similar. I am sure Muslims would be happy to learn from the Jewish experience, there is no point reinventing the wheel. The Beth Din system has operated for around 70 years, the Sharia Council only started in the 1980s, Jews are about 50 years ahead.”

Hasan was part of a delegation which visited the Federation Beth Din in Hendon last year. He said: “We were shown around the courtroom and learned about the aspects of Jewish law.”

Totally Jewish, 14 February 2008

BMI letter to Archbishop of Canterbury

“We are writing to thank you for your intelligent, thoughtful and reasoned comments on the legal recognition of communal religious identities in modern British society, and to express support for your spiritual and moral courage in the face of the onslaught in response to your speech.”

Read the British Muslim Initiative’s letter of support to Rowan Williams here.

We need to listen to the man from special branch

Ken with Qaradawi“Last week, as the archbishop’s sharia storm raged, Gordon Brown banned the leading Islamic cleric Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi from the country. The pretext given was his support for Palestinian suicide attacks during the intifada. But the 81-year-old scholar has been to Britain several times since then – in fact he was encouraged to come by the government after the Iraq invasion because of his opposition to al-Qaida.

“The real reason for the ban, apart from the competition to appear tough on terror, is his links with the Muslim Brotherhood, the most influential Islamist organisation in the Arab world – but also a particular target for liberal hawks and neoconservatives. They have played a key role in convincing the government to end its engagement with mainstream Islamist groups and sponsor more pliant Muslim bodies.

“One man who thinks that’s not just bad for community relations but actually a threat to Britain’s security, is Detective Inspector Bob Lambert, who retired six weeks ago as head of the Metropolitan police special branch’s Muslim Contact Unit. With more than a quarter century at the sharp end of counter-terrorism operations, Lambert is scarcely a bleeding-heart liberal. But he has been unable to speak out publicly until now and is deeply frustrated by the Qaradawi ban. ‘Qaradawi is clearly useful in countering al-Qaida propaganda’, Lambert told me this week. ‘He is held in high esteem: how can we think meaningfully about enlisting credible Muslim community support against al-Qaida if we’re not prepared to engage constructively with the likes of Qaradawi?’

“Lambert also highlights the importance of Islamic activists’ cooperation with the anti-war movement and radical MPs such as Jeremy Corbyn and George Galloway in offering Muslim youth a way to channel their political grievances into peaceful political action. This isn’t about ‘political correctness or deference to Islamist thinking’, he insists, ‘it’s a genuine issue of London’s safety’. Groups now promoted by the government, such as the Sufi Muslim Council, may have their role, but from the perspective of countering terrorism they have ‘neither religious nor political credibility. Let’s be clear who it is that can keep London safe in the runup to the Olympic games’.”

Seumas Milne in the Guardian, 14 February 2008

For the FCO’s 2005 briefing on Qaradawi, which echoes Bob Lambert’s view, see (pdf) here

Austrian state bans mosques

VIENNA — The southernmost Austrian state of Carinthia has passed a law effectively banning the construction of mosques, drawing fire from the opposition and Muslims for religious freedom violations.

“I can only recommend to all to have the courage to stand up effectively against this Islamisation that is creeping through Europe and represents a totally different culture,” Governor Joerg Haider was quoted as saying by Reuters. “We are really the pioneers on this,” added Haider, also the leader of the far-right Alliance for the Future of Austria party.

The law requires plans for any building of “extraordinary architecture or size” to be approved by a commission to judge its compatibility with the standard look of towns. This means that mosques would stand little chance of permits.

The new law drew immediate rebuke from the opposition and Muslims alike.

“We are creating a law for something that doesn’t exist,” fumed provincial Social Democratic leader Gaby Schaunig. Schaunig said there was no request to build a mosque in the overwhelmingly Roman Catholic province.

Carinthia is home to 11,000 Muslims out of an estimated 400,000 population, the second-lowest Muslim population in Austria. Muslims, estimated at 400,000 or nearly 4 percent of the population, also denounced the law.

Omar Al-Rawi, the spokesman for Austria’s Islamic community, said it violated principles of equality and religious freedom and put Austria’s reputation on the line.

Islam Online, 13 February 2008

9/11 case pilot can claim damages

Belmarsh HMPA pilot wrongly accused of training the 9/11 hijackers is entitled to claim damages, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Judges said evidence suggested “serious defaults” in the decision to detain Lotfi Raissi in prison for nearly five months after a US extradition request. The ruling means the government has to reconsider the 33-year-old’s claim for compensation, which it had refused.

Speaking after the judgement, Mr Raissi, of west London, said he had suffered a miscarriage of justice, and had now been “completely exonerated. I am very glad. I always had faith in British justice. Surely I can expect to hear from the home secretary with the long-awaited apology very soon.”

He said his wrongful arrest had left him blacklisted as a pilot and unable to work. “They destroyed my life, they destroyed my career. For this I will never, ever forgive them,” he said.

BBC News, 14 February 2008