‘Fears of Muslim anger over religious book’

Does God Hate WomenAn academic book about religious attitudes to women is to be published this week despite concerns it could cause a backlash among Muslims because it criticises the prophet Muhammad for taking a nine-year-old girl as his third wife.

The book, entitled Does God Hate Women?, suggests that Muhammad’s marriage to a child called Aisha is “not entirely compatible with the idea that he had the best interests of women at heart”.

It also says that Cherie Blair, wife of the former prime minister, was “incorrect” when she defended Islam in a lecture by claiming “it is not laid down in the Koran that women can be beaten by their husbands and their evidence should be devalued as it is in some Islamic courts”.

This weekend, the publisher, Continuum, said it had received “outside opinion” on the book’s cultural and religious content following suggestions that it might cause offence. “We sought some advice and paused for thought before deciding to go ahead with publication,” said Oliver Gadsby, the firm’s chief executive. The book will be released on Thursday.

Sunday Times, 31 May 2009


Sounds to me like a cynical attempt by the authors, Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom – who are associated with the notoriously Islamophobic website Butterflies and Wheels – to boost sales of their book, which has already been turned down by Verso.

The report concludes with a quote from a Muslim critic: “No one will swallow talk about child brides. It would lead to a huge backlash, as we saw with The Jewel of Medina.” And who is the individual the Sunday Times has chosen to approach as a representative voice of British Muslims? Wouldn’t you know it, it’s Anjem Choudary, leader of the minuscule gang of provocateurs who previously traded under the name of Al-Muhajiroun.

Which only goes to show that, when it comes to depicting the UK Muslim community, the “serious” press often shows the same irresponsibility and contempt for accuracy as the worst of the tabloids.

Update:  See also Benson’s opinion piece in the Observer and Yusuf Smith’s response (“The article left me wondering how a respectable liberal Sunday broadsheet can print such a shoddy article containing such obvious generalisations and faulty logic”) at Indigo Jo Blogs.

Al-Muhajiroun sent packing

Anti-Al-Muhajiroun-protest2

The Muslim community turned on extremists in their midst yesterday, telling them they were “sick and tired” of their behaviour.

The angry confrontation came in Luton, where anti-Islamist protesters brandished England flags last Sunday, before clashing with police.

Passing traffic ground to a halt as the large group of moderates confronted about a dozen extremists. As the radical Muslims began to set up their stall, they were surrounded by a crowd shouting “we don’t want you here” and “move on, move on”.

Farasat Latif, of the Islamic Centre in Luton, which was firebombed after the protest against the soldiers, said moderate members of his community took action because police had failed to move the group on.

During the protest against the homecoming parade of the Royal Anglian regiment in March, the extremists had shouted “baby killers” and “butchers of Basra” as well as brandishing placards against the Iraq war.

He said the extremists, who follow the militant group led by Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammed, had fuelled feelings against the Muslim community which led to a march last Sunday in Luton which was disrupted by white, right-wing extremists. Mr Latif said:

“They represent nobody but themselves. The community decided to move them on because the police won’t. We have asked them, but they did nothing. We have been the victims twice over – from the stupidity of Muslim extremists who metaphorically pour petrol and fan the flames of the right-wing extremists. This was a peaceful demonstration and we hope they get the message that the law-abiding community is sick and tired of them.”

Daily Mail, 30 May 2009

See also “Unmasked: The football hooligans behind last weekend’s bloody protest against a Muslim war demo”, Daily Mail, 31 May 2009.

You’ll note, by the way, that the Mail can’t manage to report the demonstration against the Al-Muhajiroun extremists without reference to “scenes of violence”.

Update:  Read the Islamic Center statement “Our action against the neo-Khawaarij: al-Muhaajiroon” here.

Posted in UK

BBC apologises to MCB over Charles Moore’s slurs

Daud Abdullah, Muhammad Abdul Bari, Inayat BunglawalaThe BBC has offered £30,000 and an apology to the Muslim Council of Britain after airing accusations that it encouraged the killing of British troops.

The corporation offered the settlement after a Question Time panellist accused the council of failing to condemn attacks on British soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Charles Moore, a former editor of The Daily Telegraph, made the comments on the programme in March during a debate about Islamic protests at a soldiers’ homecoming parade in Luton. He claimed that the council thought it was a “good thing, even an Islamic thing” to kill troops.

The council, an umbrella organisation representing about 500 Islamic bodies in Britain, said that his claims were a “total lie” and threatened the BBC with legal action. It pointed to a 2007 interview with its secretary-general, Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, published in a national newspaper, in which he categorically condemned attacks on British soldiers.

Last night Dr Bari said: “These kinds of statements are very damaging, and we received many complaints from our Muslim supporters who said they were extremely offended by the comments. In fact when a British man called Ken Bigley was kidnapped in Iraq, we sent envoys there to plead for his release. This is accusing us of encouraging terrorism abroad.”

The council’s lawyers are now considering the BBC’s offer.

Times, 30 May 2009

See also ENGAGE and Pickled Politics.

Teacher did not give pupils detention for refusing to ‘pray to Allah’

A teacher has been sacked after parents claimed that their children were forced to pray to Allah during a religious education lesson. Alison Phillips was accused of giving two pupils detention after they refused to kneel down and “pray to Allah” during the class. However, an investigation by the school concluded that there was no truth in the allegation.

A statement released on behalf of the school by Cheshire East Council said:

“It can be confirmed that following a long and rigorous disciplinary process, a member of staff at Alsager School has been dismissed from her post. The member of staff was suspended in July 2008 following parental complaints and newspaper reports relating to an RE lesson.

“After full consideration of a range of other professional issues, the governing body was satisfied that an irretrievable breakdown in the relationship between employer and employee had occurred and that the employee should be dismissed from her post.

“In reaching this decision, the governing body wish to make very clear that they were completely satisfied that at no point did that member of staff make children pray to Allah or put boys in detention for refusing to do so.”

Daily Mail, 30 May 2009


For media coverage last July see the Daily Mail, Daily TelegraphDaily Express, Daily Mirror, Fox News, Fox News Radio, World Net Daily and Jihad Watch.

Third of Europe’s Muslims ‘face discrimination’

FRA survey 2009An EU survey has found that one in three Muslim people living in Europe feel they were discriminated against in 2008, but many failed to report racist incidents because of a lack of trust in authorities.

The Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) released the survey of Muslims in 14 EU member states on Thursday.

It said that, while over 30 per cent of those questioned had faced discrimination, only 21 per cent reported discriminatory incidents and cases of racist crime. Young Muslims in particular have little faith in the police as a public institution.

Some 59 per cent of Muslim respondents believed that “nothing would happen or change by reporting” and 38 per cent said that “it happens all the time” and therefore they do not make an effort to report incidents.

The report calls on European policy makers to establish “adequate mechanisms for reporting and recording discrimination and racist crime.”

It also said that member states should assess whether ethnic profiling by the authorities “effectively increases the identification of criminal activity or alienates and discriminates against Muslim communities.”

Only 10 per cent of Muslims who experienced prejudice said that this was solely due to their religious beliefs, while over half of the respondents felt that their ethnic origin was the reason for the discrimination.

About 30 per cent of the discrimination cases occurred when Muslims were looking for work or at work, while 14 per cent took place in bars, restaurants or in dealings with landlords, according to the report.

FRA director Morten Kjaerum said: “Employment is a key part of the integration process. It is central to the contributions that migrants make to society and to making such contributions visible. Discrimination may hamper the integration process,” Mr Kjaerum warned.

The report was part of the first ever EU-wide survey on the experiences of immigrants and ethnic minorities, which reported last month that more than half of those groups believe discrimination is widespread where they live in Europe.

Xenophobic and anti-Muslim rhetoric – and in some cases violence – has increased in several countries in the run-up to the European elections. Some analysts are forecasting a swing to the right in European parliamentary elections from June 4-7.

Morning Star, 30 May 2009

Founders of Muslim charity get 65 years in prison

Holy_Land_FoundationTwo founding members of what was once the nation’s largest Muslim charity were each sentenced to 65 years in prison Wednesday for funneling millions of dollars to the Palestinian militant group Hamas.

Shukri Abu Baker, 50, and Ghassan Elashi, 55, were among the five members of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development sentenced to prison by U.S. District Judge Jorge Solis. The men and Holy Land were convicted in November on 108 charges.

The convictions followed a mistrial in which the government in 2007 failed to sway jurors that the now-defunct charity, based in the Dallas suburb of Richardson, was in fact aiding Hamas.

The two Holy Land leaders were convicted on charges ranging from supporting a terrorist organization to money laundering and tax fraud. The group wasn’t accused of violence but of bankrolling Hamas-controlled schools and social welfare programs.

Mufid Abdulqader, 49, was sentenced to 20 years on three conspiracy counts. Mohammad El-Mezain, 55, got 15 years for one count of conspiracy. Abdulrahman Odeh received 15 years for three conspiracy counts.

The sentencing re-energized Holy Land’s supporters, who believe the prosecution was a politically motivated product of former President George W. Bush’s “war on terror” and a prime example of post-Sept. 11 anti-Islam fervor. Across the street from the courthouse, a handful of people held a banner that read “Feeding Children Is Not A Crime.”

Abu Baker’s daughter, 25-year-old Zaira Abu Baker, said outside the courtroom that the group was a legitimate charity. “I’ve been with my dad 100 percent of the way,” she said. “I saw the work he did. He devoted his life to helping needy children. But after 9/11, I guess, there’s hysteria. They pick and choose people, and unfortunately it’s us.”

Associated Press, 27 May 2009

‘Please uncover your face. It’s our custom’

“Would it be wrong to try to convey to communities in Britain who adopt the full hijab that, though it is a woman’s legal right to dress as she chooses, she should recognise that she’s in a country where many people will find a masked face disturbing, and that (without meaning to) she is acting in a culturally inappropriate manner, which may offend?”

Matthew Parris poses the question, in the Times, 28 May 2009

See also ENGAGE, 29 May 2009

IHRC exposes CST

The Islamic Human Rights Commission has just published a well-researched briefing, “Concerns regarding demonisation of Islam and Muslims by Community Security Trust publications“, which exposes the Islamophobic agenda of the CST, an organisation that claims to be merely a defence organisation for the Jewish community (an entirely admirable role in itself) but also pursues a hardline right-wing Zionist agenda that leads it to adopt a hostile attitude towards Muslims, and politicised Muslims in particular.