Blink trashes Policy Exchange report

An opinion poll claiming to show that multiculturalism has driven Muslim youth to extremism dominated yesterday’s news headlines. But further investigation has shown the Policy Exchange report to be little more than a sham. The first warning signs were the refusal of the think tank to reveal their methodology and the questions they asked.

Closer analysis of the “Living Apart Together” report indicates a high level of spin in the conclusions. Experts say that far from being an “independent” think tank, Policy Exchange is actually a right-wing neo-Con leaning outfit, a reality that journalists failed to spot amid a blitz of media coverage yesterday.

While Policy Exchange claimed 13% of Muslims aged 16 to 24 years old supported Al Qaeda’s war against the West, The 1990 Trust’s survey showed just 1% of those surveyed supported the 7/7 bombings. Ruhul Tarafder, the lead author of the Trust’s report, said:

“Our questions and methodology is in our report for all to see, so there can be no spin. Whereas The 1990 Trust report received little press attention, it is worrying that the media have leapt upon the Policy Exchange report despite so many doubts about the organisation and its findings.

‘When the Policy Exchange claim that 37% of Muslims between 16 and 24 support sharia law, I ask: why is the meaning of sharia not explained in their report? Like the word Jihad, it has a much wider meaning than the Western stereotypes. And did they try to find out the level of understanding about sharia from the people they interviewed? I suspect not.

“This is a deeply flawed report, tailored to fit a right-wing agenda, with its real conclusions hidden from public view.”

BLINK news report, 30 January 2007

Read the 1990 Trust’s survey Muslim views: foreign policy and its effects here.

Express is ‘Shocked by the rise of militant Islam in Britain’

Shocked by the rise of militant Islam in Britain

Daily Express, 29 January 2007

Young people are our future, which is why a recent poll of Muslims in the UK gives deep cause for concern. Increasingly, the 16 to 24 age group is rejecting the often moderate beliefs of the older generation in favour of a radical, politicised interpretation of Islam. This is the group which would welcome Sharia law; would like to see women wearing the hijab; and is most likely to admire Al Qaeda.

While other findings are more reassuring (84 per cent of Muslims believe they are treated fairly in British society) it has always been clear that dangerous extremism will spring from a minority which the peaceful majority is unable to contain. This is quite likely to mean parents do not even know that their children have been brainwashed by fundamentalists.

But extremist clerics are not solely to blame. We must also point the finger at the now widely discredited policy of multiculturalism, which has been the constant background music of these young people’s lives. It has encouraged feelings of difference and separateness – and discouraged any sense of pride in being British. The result? Thousands of youngsters harbour sympathy for suicide bombers and despise the society they were born into. Surely an alarming prospect for us all.

Younger Muslims ‘more political’

Young Muslims are much more likely than their parents to be attracted to political forms of Islam, a think tank survey has suggested. Support for Sharia law, Islamic schools and wearing the veil is much stronger among younger Muslims, a poll for the centre-right Policy Exchange found. The report’s lead author, Munira Mirza, blamed government policy for a growing split between Muslims and non-Muslims.

BBC News, 29 January 2007


Yes, following on from Martin Bright and When Progressives Treat with Reactionaries, it’s another “liberal” opponent of Islamism and multiculturalism making common cause with right-wing Islamophobes via Policy Exchange. Interestingly, Munira Mirza is part of the tendency around Spiked Online and the Institute of Ideas, which was formerly the Revolutionary Communist Party. Mind you, the libertarian individualism promoted by the ex-RCP these days fits in quite well with Tory values.

For further analysis see Rolled Up Trousers, 29 January 2007 and BBC News, 29 January 2007

The report has been applauded by the fascists as “yet more proof of the growing danger to the UK from Muslim separatism”. See BNP news article, 29 January 2007

The Policy Exchange report Living Apart Together: British Muslims and the paradox of multiculturalism can be downloaded here.

Cameron: Radical Islam is mirror-image of neo-Nazis

Cameron - Radical IslamDavid Cameron today attacked radical Muslims as “the mirror image” of the neo-Nazi British National Party. He used a keynote speech on race and integration to signal plans for tough measures against extremists on both sides.

Attacking the BNP for preaching “pure hate”, he went on: “And those who seek a Sharia state, or special treatment and a separate law for British Muslims are, in many ways, the mirror image of the BNP.”

Speaking this afternoon at the New Testament Church of God in Handsworth, Birmingham, Mr Cameron was set to say that many barriers to integration were the fault of politicians. Multiculturalism, he was due to say, was “manipulated” to separate communities rather than help them live together.

Evening Standard, 29 January 2007

See also BBC News, 29 January 2007

For the text of Cameron’s speech, see here.

For Osama Saeed’s comments see Rolled Up Trousers, 29 January 2007

The appalling Martin Bright declares his support for Cameron (“His comments on radical Islam being the mirror image of the BNP are spot on”) at the New Statesman, 29 January 2007

For the fascists’ response see BNP news article, 29 January 2007

‘Crusader’ Cameron puts his foot in it with Muslims

David_CameronHapless Tory leader David Cameron put his upper-class foot in it with Britain’s Muslim population on Sunday when he declared a new “crusade for fairness.”

Mr Cameron attacked “clunking” government attempts to promote community cohesion, such as urging Muslim parents to spy on their children or encouraging people to fly the union flag on their lawns. “It’s no use behaving like the proverbial English tourist abroad, shouting ever more loudly at the hapless foreigner who doesn’t understand what is being said. “We can’t bully people into feeling British – we have to inspire them,” he said.

He pledged to tackle the oppression of Muslim women who are prevented from going out to work or attending university. But, by invoking the language of the bloody Medieval crusades, he risked antagonising the very community that he was seeking to win over.

Muslim Association of Britain spokesman Osama Saeed said that Mr Cameron’s use of the word “crusade” was “extraordinarily sloppy” and warned that it risked undermining his central message.

“We do see prominent leaders in the West use this word. George Bush launched his ‘crusade’ against terrorism a few years ago and I do not understand their fixation with it. It is not a nice word and nice things do not happen on the back of crusades,” said Mr Saeed. “Whatever David Cameron’s message was today – and I agree with much of it – it will be lost amid words like this. It devalues his message.”

Morning Star, 29 January 2007

For further comments by Osama Saeed see Rolled Up Trousers, 29 January 2007

Poll reveals young Muslims admire Al-Qaeda, Express claims

Shocking evidence of the radicalisation of young British Muslims emerged last night after a poll showed more than one- third want Islamic law imposed in the UK.

Three-quarters of Muslims aged 16-24 believe women should be forced to wear veils or headscarves and a third believe heretics who give up the Islamic faith deserve to be put to death, research also reveals. The survey also found more than one in eight young adult believers “admires” Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups.

Think-tank Policy Exchange, which commissioned the poll, blamed Government-sponsored multi-cultural policies for encouraging the separation of ethnic and religious social groups that fuels fanaticism.

The findings provoked widespread concern last night. Tory MP Philip Davies said: “It is very alarming but it is completely correct to say that multi-cultural policies are the cause of these sorts of attitudes. Labour has done virtually anything possible to avoid getting Muslims to integrate into British society.”

Today, David Cameron will admit that “uncontrolled immigration” has undermined social harmony in Britain. “You can’t have proper integration if people are coming into Britain at a faster rate than we can cope with,” he will say in a speech in Birmingham.

Munira Mirza, the report’s author, said: “The emergence of a strong Muslim identity in Britain is, in part, a result of multicultural policies implemented since the 1980s which have emphasised difference at the expense of shared national identity and divided people along ethnic, religious and cultural lines.”

Daily Express, 29 January 2007

Multi-culturalism damages UK, says Cameron

David Cameron last night launched his most outspoken attack on the doctrine of multi-culturalism, which he said had undermined Britain.

He criticised “clunking” government initiatives designed to redress the balance. He said it was “time for a more British approach” and he promised that a Tory administration would wage a “crusade for fairness”.

The Tory leader said: “Yes, we need to ensure that every one of our citizens can speak to each other in our national language. Yes, we need to ensure that our children are taught British history properly. And I do think it is important to create more opportunities for celebrating our sense of nationhood.

“We will set out a clear and consistent path to ensure these things actually happen, starting with our policy review, which will make specific recommendations this week.”

The report by the Conservatives’ policy commission on national security will highlight the issue of segregation in Muslim communities and call for forced marriage to be made a criminal offence. It will also criticise the removal of Asian girls from sixth forms and question whether some Muslim parents are supporting their daughters’ desire for education. It will warn that in some parts of the community women are being denied access to education, work and involvement in the political process and even denied access to mosques.

Mr Cameron will say in a speech tomorrow in Birmingham that a Tory administration would be “bold and not hide behind the screen of cultural sensitivity to say publicly that no woman should be denied rights which both their religion and their country, Britain, support”.

In an article for the Observer, he said: “The doctrine of multiculturalism has undermined our nation’s sense of cohesion because it emphasises what divides us rather than what brings us together. It has been manipulated to entrench the right to difference, a unifying [sic – should read ‘divisive’] concept.”

In a veiled attack on ministers such as John Reid and Gordon Brown, who have both championed Britishness, he said: “It’s no use behaving like the proverbial English tourist abroad, shouting ever more loudly at the hapless foreigner who doesn’t understand what is behind said. We can’t bully people into feeling British – we have to inspire them.”

Sunday Telegraph, 28 January 2007


See also David Cameron, “No one will be left behind in a Tory Britain”, Observer, 28 January 2007

A classic example of two-faced Cameronism – presenting a liberal image by criticising the government for “instructing Muslim parents to spy on their children” while appeasing his core supporters with a right-wing attack on multiculturalism.

New South Wales premier calls for ban on HT

New South Wales Premier Morris Iemma is calling on the Federal Government to ban the group Hizb-ut Tahrir, which is holding a conference in south-west Sydney today.

Hizb-ut Tahrir, which is banned in Europe and parts of the Middle East, focuses on the idea of creating an ideal Islamic state somewhere in the world.

Mr Iemma says the group should be banned from Australia.

“This is an organisation that is basically saying that it wants to declare war on Australia, our values and our people,” he said. “That’s the big difference and that’s why I believe that they are just beyond the pale.

“Enough is enough! And it’s time for the Commonwealth to review this organisation’s status and take the lead from other countries and ban them.”

ABC News, 28 January 2007

The MCB and HMD

The Guardian reports on the decision by the Muslim Council of Britain to maintain its existing policy of not participating in Holocaust Memorial Day. Leading figures in the MCB apparently advocated participation but were voted down 23-14 at a meeting of the MCB’s Central Working Committee.

It might be noted that the very people who condemn the MCB for its stand on this issue are often the same people who characterise the MCB leadership as “self-appointed” and subject to no democratic accountability.

See also “MCB letter to Nick Joseph, HMD’s Acting CEO”, MCB news report, 27 January 2007