Muslims should not be blamed for work of a few: CAIR

Ibrahim HooperThe vast majority of peaceful Muslims should not be blamed for the work of a few disgruntled “criminals”, a leading American Muslim activist said Sunday, July 17.

“The problem is that one or two criminals can create an impression that an entire community is to be blamed, and so you are always subject to those one or two people,” Ibrahim Hooper, head of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), told Agence France-Presse (AFP). “If you know the reality, you can see these handful of people as the aberration that they are – the same way that we didn’t say Catholicism was bad when the IRA was blowing up things in London.”

Islam Online, 17 July 2005

A modest proposal for dealing with Islam

“The average American knows the so-called war on terror is not really a war on terror. He knows in his gut that what’s happening is that we are fighting another war with Islam. That’s what it is, no matter what the politicians say….

“As long as a liberal ideology of tolerance prevails in the West, Islamic terrorist will strike at will. It is a simple matter of Islam taking the liberal ideology of the West and turning this ideology against itself. It is the great irony of liberalism that by being tolerant it undermines its own existence. Liberalism now goes out of its way to encourage those who want to overthrow it. When confronted with an aggressive and intolerant force like Islam, tolerance ends with its own extinction….

“Deportation of Muslims from Western societies is not a picture the liberal press wants to see, but it may be necessary to do this. With their reluctance to assimilate, more so in Europe than in the United States, Muslim ghettos are breeding grounds for terrorists.”

Robert Klein Engler writes.

ChronWatch, 16 July 2005

Guantánamo trials ‘violate justice’

guantanamo7The military tribunals of suspected terrorists held at Guantánamo Bay were a “tremendous failure”, a US military lawyer told Congress yesterday.

Navy Lieutenant Commander Charles Swift was testifying before the first full Senate hearing on the Bush administration’s treatment of detainees since the “war on terror” began.

His comments come amid calls from Democrats and some Republicans that the Guantánamo Bay prison camp be closed down.

Lt Cdr Swift was assigned to represent Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Osama bin Laden’s driver, whom he said had been left mentally disturbed after being held in solitary confinement for seven months. Lt Cdr Swift said that Mr Hamdan was offered the opportunity to see a defence lawyer only if he pleaded guilty to the charges made against him.

Guardian, 16 June 2005

Usually volatile mayor wins praise for low-key presence

London United“Ken Livingstone, London’s famously loose-lipped mayor, boarded a subway train here as cameras flashed, demonstrating this city’s resolve not to be cowed by the terrorist attacks that struck three subways and a bus last week. ‘We are going to work, we carry on our lives,’ Livingstone told reporters on Monday morning before resuming his usual commute to work. ‘We don’t let a small group of terrorists change the way we live.’ And that was all.

“Livingstone, 60, has emerged as a sort of anti-Rudolph Giuliani in the wake of the terrorist attacks, the worst the city has ever seen. He has made two solemn statements worthy of Winston Churchill, but has otherwise kept a remarkably low profile for a man whose quarter-century in politics has been marked by bold initiatives and maverick debates. There has been nothing of the post-Sept. 11 take-charge behavior that briefly catapulted Giuliani, as mayor of New York, to the national political stage.

“At last, some people are saying, ‘Red Ken,’ as he is known because of his outspoken liberal views, has hit the right note of humility and outrage and quiet resolve without getting anyone upset. But there may also be something else at play: Livingstone was lambasted last year for inviting an Egyptian-born, Qatari-based conservative cleric, Sheik Yousef al-Qaradawi, to London in what Livingstone’s defenders say was an attempt to demonstrate to the city’s disaffected, radical Muslim youth the mayor’s willingness to engage in dialogue.”

New York Times, 12 July 2005

Or perhaps, duh, it might be because the Mayor of London has significantly fewer powers than the Mayor of New York. Or hadn’t the NYT noticed that? Plus, of course, two days after this article was published the mayor addressed a 50,000-strong vigil in Trafalgar Square to commemorate the victims of the bombings – and two days after that organised the massive London United concert to celebrate the capital’s diversity and protest against those who sought to destroy it.

London’s mayor: A terrorist puppet?

“Our hearts go out to London – but not to its mayor. London’s leader, Ken Livingstone, eloquently condemned the recent terrorist bombings. But in the past, he never seemed too concerned about terrorists murdering Israelis. The tale of Livingstone’s ambivalence is a sordid kind of Greek tragedy.

“Last year, he welcomed a violently Jew-hating Muslim preacher to London. In so doing, he became a silent partner of Islamic terrorism – which has now turned against his own city. Today, he is an updated Oedipus Rex, accessory to a horrible crime of which he himself is a victim.”

David Gelernter in the LA Times, 15 July 2005

US apologizes to UK imam for visa mishap

The United States administration has lifted a visa ban on an internationally renowned British Muslim scholar and apologized to him for the inconvenience, allowing him to visit the country anytime.

“I woke up Friday (July 15) to a phone call from the office of British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, and his aides apologized on his behalf for the US move and told me that the minister would raise the issue with top US officials,” Zaki Badawi, head of the Islamic College in London, told IslamOnline.net by phone Saturday, July 16.

Badawi said few hours after the conversation, the US embassy in London called him to apologize in their turn and stressed that it was an unintentional mistake.

Islam Online, 16 July 2005

US turns away British Muslim leader

Zaki BadawiOne of Britain’s most senior Muslim leaders said Thursday that he was denied entry to the United States without explanation, nearly a week after the deadly subway and bus attacks in London. Dr. Zaki Badawi, head of the Muslim College, told The Associated Press he was denied entry when he arrived in New York on Wednesday. No explanation was given, he said. He had been invited to speak at the Chautauqua Institution in Chautauqua, New York, where he planned to give a talk under the title “The Law and Religion in Society.”

USA Today, 14 July 2005

See also BBC News, 15 July 2005

‘Multiculturalism: dishonest and deadly’

“The news that the London terrorist attacks were carried out by second-generation Muslim immigrants should not surprise us. For years now we in the West have indulged a whole set of destructive ideas whose bitter fruit we will all continue to harvest, as more and more unassimilated and disaffected immigrant children turn against the countries that welcomed their parents and provided them with a prosperity and freedom unknown in their countries of origin. This baneful idea goes by the name of multiculturalism.”

Bruce Thornton on what has become a major theme among right-wing commentators post-7/7.

Private Papers, 14 July 2005