Owen Jones, co-chair of the Socialist Youth Network, argues for the left to put fighting Islamophobia at the centre of its activities.


We will not be silent

Labour Left Briefing, December 2006

Islamophobia is the anti-Semitism of our age. As anti-Semitism once paraded itself in the rhetoric of anti-capitalism, today Islamophobia clothes itself in the rhetoric of secularism. The 19th century German socialist August Bebel once referred to anti-Semitism as “the socialism of fools”: today it could be equally be said that Islamophobia is the “secularism of fools”. Much to their amusement, Islamophobia is no longer the preserve of the BNP (who, after all, now almost exclusively target their hatred against the Muslim community). Islamophobia is the political mainstream.

Worryingly, even some on the left have been reluctant to defend the Muslim minority against the onslaught begun by Jack Straw on the grounds that the veil is a clear form of female oppression. This entirely misses the point. Jack Straw did not denounce the niqab on the grounds that it oppresses women: he attacked it as a “sign of separation and difference”. Of course the left must support the emancipation of women from all forms of subjugation – including from the veil. However, such a profound cultural shift can only be achieved through the struggle of Muslim women themselves. The anti-Muslim hysteria triggered by Straw’s comments will surely only drive thousands of Muslims into the arms of Islamic fundamentalism. Indeed, there are reports of niqab sales trebling since Straw’s disastrous intervention.

Above all, it is necessary to understand the nature of Islamophobia. There was a shocking audacity to Straw’s description of the veil as a barrier to good community relations because of his prominent role in the murderous invasion and occupation of Iraq (little else has done more to antagonise, alienate and radicalise British Muslims). However, the “war on terror” is fundamental to understanding the basis of Islamophobia. Western armies occupy Iraq and Afghanistan; western militarism currently encircles Iran; and western power backs Israel in its war against the Palestinian and Lebanese people. In other words, the West is at war in Muslim lands and against Muslim peoples.

Historically, racism has accompanied and justified western imperialist interventions. For example, the “Scramble for Africa” of the late 19th century was accompanied by the Social Darwinist dehumanisation of African people as backward and uncivilised. Anthropologists such as Madison Grant and Alex Carrel published pseudo-scientific racist tracts claiming the innate “inferiority” of black people. While simultaneously purporting to be bringing civilisation to Africa, the European powers slaughtered tens of millions in their quest for cheap access to natural resources.

Similarly, Islamophobia has been used to portray the Muslim people as innately violent and brutal at a time when western armies are responsible for the mass murder of hundreds of thousands of Muslims in the search for oil this time, under the cover of “democratisation”. History will damn the dark irony of commentators such as Leo McKinstry of the Daily Express who described Muslim attitudes as “repulsive, barbaric, prejudiced or superstitious” or for not showing “any willingness to embrace the tolerant values of western democracy” in the same week that Lancet revealed over 650,000 civilians had perished because of the western invasion of Iraq.

Muslims are being demonised by the British ruling class in a manner that no ethnic minority has had to suffer for at least a generation. As attacks mount on this impoverished community – a community already deeply alienated by a murderous and unjust foreign policy – it is clear that Islamic fundamentalism will only grow further in strength. However, Islamophobia may be on the ascent but it is not unstoppable. The left must act now to defend the Muslim community from this rising tide of Islamophobia. To fail to do so would be a betrayal of our finest traditions.

Parties unite to condemn BNP

The four main parties in Wales have united to condemn the racist British National Party for its comments attacking the National Museum of Wales over the staging of two exhibitions on Islamic culture. The exhibitions explore the contribution of Muslims to world history, science and art.

On its website the BNP states, “You may think that this is rather strange, particularly as Wales has an enormous heritage of its own, not least in the field of early Christianity.” The website goes on to refer to planning permission granted for a large mosque in Cardiff and suggests Plaid Cymru should be renamed Plaid Islam because it has several Muslim councillors.

Labour’s Deputy Health Minister and Newport East AM John Griffiths said, “This is horrible stuff. The National Museum should be congratulated for opening the eyes of Wales to the huge contributions Muslims have made in so many fields. The BNP is trying to foster intolerance and must not be allowed to succeed.”

Plaid Cymru’s Helen Mary Jones said, “There is no place in a modern, multicultural Wales for this kind of rubbish. The National Museum has a duty to inform and educate … Confining information or representation to that of any one race, language, political belief, or religion is a very dangerous prospect.”

The Welsh Conservatives’ culture spokeswoman Lisa Francis said, “Exhibitions such as this play an important role in promoting understanding, tolerance and respect for religion and culture. It is something which should be celebrated and encouraged. People will rightly be appalled at the BNP’s latest attempt to spread its pernicious, divisive, offensive and dangerous propaganda.”

Welsh Liberal Democrat culture spokeswoman Eleanor Burnham said, “Wales has a proud tradition as an outward-looking nation which has been enriched by the contributions of people from other countries and traditions.”

A spokesman for the National Museum said, “We put on these two small high-quality exhibitions at National Museum Cardiff sites for a number of reasons. The material relates to communities of Muslim background who are an important part of Wales’ history and contemporary life. It meets a wish from visitors from other communities to know more about Muslim cultures.”

Wales Onlines, 24 November 2006

‘Don’t succumb to Islamophobia’ – Mecca2Medina

Mecca2Medina (2)The Islamic hip-hop and ragga group, Mecca2Medina, has urged black and other ethnic minorities not to succumb to what they described as the worrying trend of Islamophobia in the UK.

Abdul-Karim Talib and Rakin Fetuga told The Voice that prominent news items about British-raised Islamic extremists and media debates about whether women should wear the niqab (or face veil) have led to negative perceptions of the Muslim community.

They said prejudice has increased although only a minority of Muslims become extremists. They said blacks should be wary of jumping on these bandwagons because black people in the past have also been victims of stereotyping. “It is being blown out of proportion. The Muslim community feels as if it is under attack,” they said.

Mecca2Medina made their comments after their performance at the first staging of Eid in the Square.

The Voice, 24 November 2006

‘Veil Wars’ reveal Europe’s intolerance

“Europe’s traditions of secular tolerance appear to be haunted by the Islamic veil. Every week seems to bring new headlines announcing moves to crack down on the wearing of what critics appear to deem this most alienating symbol of Muslim faith, whether in French public schools, British government buildings or out in public in the Netherlands.

“But is European tolerance more threatened by hijab head-scarf, or even the face-covering niqab … or by the hypocrisy and low-grade xenophobia of those telling Muslim women that this attack on their religious practice is really for their own good? Beneath all the reminders of secularist tradition and progressive discourse cited in Europe’s headscarf debate lies the mean, provincial ‘not in our country, you don’t’ attitude – even when many of the women at whom it’s addressed to were born and raised in ‘our country’.”

Bruce Crumley in Time Magazine, 24 November 2006

Intolerance in Europe

The Washington Post examines “the blatant bigotry of many mainstream political leaders, journalists and other elites against Islam and its followers” in Europe.

The article continues: “Sometimes the bigots portray their crude attacks on Muslim beliefs and culture as a defense of freedom of speech – as when a Danish newspaper last year chose to publish gratuitously offensive cartoons about the prophet Muhammad. Sometimes they claim to be promoting better communication, as when British parliamentarian Jack Straw recently asked Muslim women to remove their veils when visiting his office. Luckily for the enemies of cynicism and disingenuousness, there is also the Dutch government – which no longer bothers to disguise its ugly prejudice.”

Editorial in Washington Post, 25 November 2006

‘We’re leaving the country after racists abused and spat at me’

A white Muslim mother who was spat at and abused by drunken football fans in front of her children today told of her humiliation at the hands of the “racist cowards”. Mother-of-five Michelle Idrees, 27, from Luton, said she had been too scared to travel to London or use public transport since the ordeal.

British-born convert Mrs Idrees was called a “f***ing Muslim slag” and told her son, then aged four, would be the “next suicide bomber” by a family of Arsenal supporters on a busy train. She is now planning to leave Britain because she feels her children have no future in this country.

Mrs Idrees said: “It was terrifying. All my children were crying hysterically, but these men wouldn’t stop. It makes me sick to think things have got so bad for Muslims that three men can say such disgusting things and threaten to punch a mother in the face, in front of her children, and nobody on the train does anything.”

One of the men had called her a “Paki-loving whore” and told her to go back to her own country. “They were big, aggressive men. I wouldn’t have answered back but I had to protect my children. Britain’s changed so much since 9/11 and 7/7 that people think we’re all terrorists.”

Mrs Idrees, who was wearing a headscarf, had been to London last August to attend an Islamic commemorative service for victims of the London bombings. She was travelling home on a Thameslink train with four of her children Stephen, 12, Chelsea, 10, Sharnia, six, and Shazan, five, as well as a friend’s two children and a neighbour, when the half-hour tirade began. Mrs Idrees, who converted to Islam after meeting her second husband, told the men that real Muslims did not support terrorism.

“They called the police and told them I had bomb in my handbag. Then they called a black woman on the train a nigger. They’re just racist cowards.”

Continue reading

‘Riot mosque gets the go-ahead’

Thus the headline to an article in today’s Daily Express, reporting on the latest developments concerning the Medina Dairy in Windsor. The article begins: “Plans for a mosque at the centre of race-hate clashes were given the go-ahead by John Prescott’s office yesterday. Residents of Windsor, where only 500 of the 30,000 population are Muslim, reacted with fury after a planning inspector overturned a local council ruling. They accused the government of political correctness and warned the decision could lead to more violence.”

British Muslim Initiative no different from BNP, says Charles Moore

Charles Moore 2Charles Moore’s column in this week’s Spectator features an attack on the rally against Islamophobia at Central Hall, Westminster, on Monday evening. The main object of Moore’s ire is shadow attorney-general Dominic Grieve, who was one of the platform speakers at the meeting.

Moore completely omits to mention that Liberty was a joint organiser of the rally, as that would rather undermine his case that the event was promoted by “Islamist” extremists. The other co-organiser of the rally, the British Muslim Initiative, is laughably described by Moore as “an offshoot of Respect, the party represented in Parliament by George Galloway”. And his characterisations of other Muslim bodies who provided speakers are equally ignorant.

Moore castigates the Tory party for believing that “it has to turn up to anything which calls itself Muslim”. Pursuing the theme common to rabid right-wingers like Melanie Phillips, pseudo-leftists like David T of Harry’s Place and “liberal” supporters of torture like Nick Cohen, that mainstream Muslim organisations represent a variety of fascism, Moore demands: “Would Mr Grieve attend BNP rallies on the grounds that one must hear the voice of white people?”

Aishah Azmi sacked

A Muslim teaching assistant who was suspended for refusing to remove her veil in the classroom has been sacked.

Aishah Azmi, 24, of Thornhill Lees, Dewsbury, west Yorkshire, was suspended on full pay earlier this year by Kirklees council and has now been sacked, sources said.

Last month, an employment tribunal dismissed three of Mrs Azmi’s claims of discrimination and harassment but found that she was victimised by Headfield Church of England junior school in Dewsbury and awarded her £1,000 for “injury to feelings”.

Mrs Azmi said she was willing to remove her veil in front of children – but not when male colleagues were present. Her case sparked a national debate on multiculturalism in Britain.

The prime minister, Tony Blair, said the veil row was part of a necessary debate about the way the Muslim community integrates into British society and said the veil was a “mark of separation” which makes people of other ethnic backgrounds feel uncomfortable.

The intervention by a series of politicians, which culminated in Mr Blair’s remarks, were criticised both by the tribunal and Muslim community leaders. The tribunal report said it was “most unfortunate” that politicians had made comments on the case which were sub judice.

The debate was sparked by the leader of the House of Commons, Jack Straw, when he said that the wearing of full veils – or niqab – made community relations more difficult.

The government’s race minister, Phil Woolas, demanded Mrs Azmi be sacked, accusing her of “denying the right of children to a full education” because her stand meant she could not “do her job” and insisted that barring men from working with her would amount to “sexual discrimination”.

The shadow home secretary, David Davis, launched a stinging attack on Muslim leaders for risking “voluntary apartheid” in Britain, and allegedly expecting special protection from criticism.

Press Association, 24 November 2006

We must display ‘our’ religious symbols like other faiths, says Express

Let Christians Wear the CrossWith a front-page article carrying the strap “Why we must display our [sic] religious symbols just like other faiths”, the Express continues its campaign to utilise BA’s foolish and indefensible ban on one of their employees wearing a visible crucifix in order to incite bigotry against Muslims:

“The right of Christians to wear the cross was defended last night by the Leader of the House of Commons. The row over the British Airways’ ban grew as MPs heard that all Britons should be able to display their faith.

“Jack Straw, the Commons Leader, said the airline’s controversial dress policy was ‘inexplicable’. And he demanded fair and equal treatment for all religions. His Commons outburst made him the most senior Government figure yet to wade into the debate over the airline’s ban on visible Christian and Jewish symbols while allowing female Muslim employees to wear headscarves.

“Passengers around the world are joining a growing boycott of BA over the company’s treatment of check-in worker Nadia Eweida. She is refusing to work after bosses ordered her not to wear a cross the size of a five pence coin that was visible to passengers. The ban has fuelled criticism that non-Muslims are being treated unfairly by ‘politically correct’ busybodies who pander to perceived Islamic sensibilities.”

Daily Express, 24 November 2006