UCL student union stands up for freedom and tolerance

UCL student unionHugh Muir interviews James Hodgson, student union activities officer at University College London, who emphatically rejects calls for a ban on UCL’s Islamic Society. He tells Muir:

“Of course it is going to be difficult and I am sure we will get some stick, but we are going to defend the Islamic Society and its right to hear from controversial speakers. We will not allow extremist activities. But at the same time we are determined not to yield. The Islamic Society is not a hotbed of extremists. Its activities are prayer meetings, cultural events, debates and music. We are going to stand up for freedom and tolerance. Surely that’s what the terrorists want to destroy.”

Guardian, 8 January 2010

Update:  See also the Al Jazeera interview with FOSIS president Faisal Hanjra and “Islamic Societies Exposed” on the FOSIS website.

Migration ‘threatens the DNA of our nation’, claims Lord Carey

Writing in the Times, Lord Carey explains why he has signed up to a call for restrictions on immigration:

“The sheer numbers of migrants … threaten the very ethos or DNA of our nation…. Democratic institutions such as the monarchy, Parliament, the judiciary, the Church of England, our free press and the BBC … support the liberal democratic values of the nation. Some groups of migrants, however, are ambivalent about or even hostile to such institutions. The proposed antiwar Islamist march in Wootton Bassett is a clear example of the difficulties extremists pose to British society.

“Furthermore, the idea that Britain can continue to welcome with open arms immigrants who immediately establish their own tribunals to apply Sharia, rather than make use of British civil law, is deeply socially divisive.”

See also the Daily MailAnd the Daily Express, which headlines its story “Let Christian migrants in first, demands Carey”.

Update:  See “The church fights back against Islamification” by Damian Thompson, editor-in-chief of the Catholic Herald, who writes:

“We have had to wait decades for this moment, but it has finally happened. A leading British clergyman has said something sensible about immigration…. Politicised Islam is at the forefront of his mind: he knows that Britain’s evangelical Christians are fed up with being told to develop ever closer ties with their Muslim neighbours…. In the long term, the future of Western civilisation can be secured only by an alliance between Christians and secularists against the totalitarian ideology of Islamism. That is a strange prospect; and even more uncomfortable is the realisation that Christianity’s survival as a mass movement may depend on something as prosaic as immigration control. But that is surely what Lord Carey is hinting at, and it is brave of him to do so.”

Further update:  See also “Damian Thompson on the ‘Islamification’ of Britain”, ENGAGE, 8 January 2010

Media attacks on Islamic societies at universities are whipping up Islamophobia

Unsubstantiated media reports on Islamic societies at University campuses inciting extremism are whipping up Islamophobia

Press release from One Society Many Cultures

Following the failed terrorist attack by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on 25 December 2009, many media reports have used the fact that the perpetrator was a student in London who was active in a student Islamic Society to imply this appalling act was incited by the perfectly normal activities of Islamic Societies in London colleges.

Such views have been rejected by Malcolm Grant, provost of University College London (UCL), who said reports that Abdulmutallab developed extreme views whilst studying at UCL were “spectacular insinuation”, and has ordered a review of the 23-year-old’s time at the university.

Attacks on Islamic Societies are unjustified, and whip up an atmosphere of fear and even hatred towards all Muslims.

Islamic Societies – like Jewish, Christian and other faith groups – are a normal part of student life. Islamic Societies give their members social support, discuss issues of faith, and, among many other activities, are a means of inter-faith and inter-community dialogue.

Islamic Societies also respond to Islamaphobia – for example following a vicious assault on Muslim students leaving prayers at City University in November, the Islamic Societies supported the victims and gathered support for widespread condemnation of the perpetrators.

Responses to this terrorist attack that encourage hostility to all Muslims and their expressions of faith add to an atmosphere which is already leading to stepped up attacks and assaults on Muslims.

In addition to the incident at City University mentioned above, in recent months there has been a rise in physical attacks on Muslims, including two murders of a taxi driver in Birmingham and a man in Tooting, South London. In Rochdale in the North West a Muslim woman was violently attacked by a BNP supporter who attempted to rip off her Hijab. Fascist and far right groups have held numerous overtly anti-Muslim demonstrations, including two outside a Mosque.

Continue reading

Passenger profiling risks damaging counter terrorism efforts

Good grief. Here‘s a press release from the Quilliam Foundation we can mostly agree with. True, you have to put up with the predictable Quilliam assertion that “governments must engage in a ‘battle of ideas’ to combat the Islamist ideologies which justify terrorism” – which, translated, means the government giving Ed Husain and his mates lots of money to denounce Islamist tendencies who have nothing whatsoever to do with al-Qaeda and who repudiate its methods. However, Quillam does at least take the right line on the actual issue of profiling. Which is more than others do.

BBC biased in favour of Muslims, claims La Plante

Lynda La PlanteCrime writer Lynda La Plante has attacked the BBC’s commissioning policy, claiming the corporation’s drama team would rather take a script by a “little Muslim boy” than one she had written.

La Plante, the creator of Prime Suspect, the award-winning detective series starring Helen Mirren, told the Daily Telegraph she found the BBC drama commissioning process “very depressing”. She said: “If my name were Usafi Iqbadal and I was 19, then they’d probably bring me in and talk.”

La Plante told the Daily Telegraph: “If you were to go to the BBC and say to them, ‘Listen, Lynda La Plante’s written a new drama, or I have this little Muslim boy who’s just written one’, they’d say: ‘Oh, we’d like to see his script’.”

Broadcast Now, 4 January 2010


See also “Muslim writers say La Plante attack on BBC is ‘insulting'” in the Independent. Sarfraz Manzoor is quoted as saying that La Plante should “get that chip off her shoulder and return to the real world rather than playing the misunderstood victim in the fantasy world in which she is currently residing”. He added: “I would love to meet the Muslim writers whose output is currently clogging up the television schedules: can she name any of these mythical individuals or are her comments simply a headline-grabbing way to yet again bash the BBC and blame Muslims?”

Please don’t listen to Anjem Choudary

First, he announced his plan to march through Wootton Bassett, in Wiltshire, carrying 500 coffins to symbolise the thousands of Muslims killed ‘by the oppressive US and UK regimes’ in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now, he is sending letters to the grieving families of fallen British soldiers, telling them he has “no sympathy whatsoever” for their plight, urging them instead to become Muslims to “save” themselves “from the hellfire”.

Is there anything Anjem “Andy” Choudary won’t do for the sake of a cheap headline? As Inayat Bunglawala wrote on Cif almost a year ago, Choudary and his gang deploy “a simple formula – hold up some offensive placards designed to get people’s backs up and call a local reporter to come along and capture some footage – that has reliably generated acres of media coverage for them in recent years”.

Our sensationalist and irresponsible media has, in fact, been deeply complicit in the rise and rise of this fanatic, devoting quite disproportionate and counter-productive coverage to his various rantings. Is Choudary an Islamic scholar whose views merit attention or consideration? No. Has he studied under leading Islamic scholars? Nope. Does he have any Islamic qualifications or credentials? None whatsoever. So what gives him the right to pontificate on Islam, British Muslims or “the hellfire”? Or proclaim himself a “sharia judge”?

Will he even manage to round up enough misfits to carry the 500 coffins with him? I doubt it – Choudary and co couldn’t even persuade enough people to join a ‘march for sharia’ that they had proudly planned to hold in central London in late October, and, at the very last minute, had to humiliatingly withdraw from their own rally. Pathetic, eh?

Mehdi Hasan at Comment is Free, 4 January 2010

Continue reading

Media attacks on Islamic societies at universities are whipping up Islamophobia

Unsubstantiated media reports on Islamic societies at University campuses inciting extremism are whipping up Islamophobia

Following the failed terrorist attack by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on 25 December 2009, many media reports have used the fact that the perpetrator was a student in London who was active in a student Islamic Society to imply this appalling act was incited by the perfectly normal activities of Islamic Societies in London colleges.

Such views have been rejected by Malcolm Grant, provost of University College London (UCL), who said reports that Abdulmutallab developed extreme views whilst studying at UCL were “spectacular insinuation”, and has ordered a review of the 23-year-old’s time at the university.

Attacks on Islamic Societies are unjustified, and whip up an atmosphere of fear and even hatred towards all Muslims.

Islamic Societies – like Jewish, Christian and other faith groups – are a normal part of student life. Islamic Societies give their members social support, discuss issues of faith, and, among many other activities, are a means of inter-faith and inter-community dialogue.

Islamic Societies also respond to Islamaphobia – for example following a vicious assault on Muslim students leaving prayers at City University in November, the Islamic Societies supported the victims and gathered support for widespread condemnation of the perpetrators.

Responses to this terrorist attack that encourage hostility to all Muslims and their expressions of faith add to an atmosphere which is already leading to stepped up attacks and assaults on Muslims.

Continue reading

How to spot a terrorist – an Islamic specialist explains

Ruth Dudley Edwards 2“Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was by all accounts a decent, virtuous teenager who wanted to do good but, lost and alone in London, he fell into a malign embrace.”

Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, Ruth Dudley Edwards (billed as an “Islamic specialist”) trots out the familiar right-wing clichés about Abdulmutallab being converted to extremism/terrorism during his three years as a student at University College London.

She accuses the UCL authorities of failing in their duty of care to Abdulmutallab: “Did it concern no one that this lonely boy had taken to wearing Islamic dress? Wasn’t anyone worried about the radicalism of the ‘War on Terror Week’ Abdulmutallab organised as [UCL Islamic society] president?”

Yes, really – according to this “Islamic specialist”, wearing traditional clothing and opposing Bush’s “War on Terror” are apparently signs of incipient terrorism.

Continue reading