Over 70% of Londoners back law against religious hatred

Nearly three-quarters of the people of London support the British government’s proposals to introduce a new law to outlaw the incitement to religious incitement, according to a new poll.

The poll, carried out on behalf of the Mayor of London Ken Livingstone, found that 72 per cent of Londoners support new bill, introduced for the third time by the British government on Thursday.

Only 15 per cent said that they opposed making a new law, which is aimed to protect Muslims from the abuse they have suffered since the so-called war on terrorism by extending the existing incitement to racial hatred against people to grounds of their religion.

Speaking at his weekly press conference on Thursday, Livingstone welcomed the findings, insisting that “people of all faiths are entitled to equal protection.

“Some religious groups, such as Jews and Sikhs are already protected from incitement to hatred under race relations laws, but members of other religions, such as Muslims and Christians, are not. This makes no sense at all,” he said.

“The new law will provide important protection and reassurance for Muslim and other communities that have experienced growing abuse and targeting by extremists,” said the mayor of the most diverse capital in the world.

He rejected the massive campaign being whipped up by both right wing politicians and libertarians in opposition to the proposal, insisted that the bill, “will not restrict the right of people to criticise religions in literature, art or other fields.”

The mayor said it was just the same as the outlawing of incitement to racial hatred in 1986, which “did nothing to restrict artistic freedom.”

Muslim News, 10 June 2005

Defending an anti-incitement law

Thoughtful reply to Polly Toynbee at Talk Politics:

“Underneath it all the fundamental principle of the bill, that we should offer some protection to law-abiding citizens against personal attacks predicated on their holding particular religious beliefs is basically sound. How can any reasonable person argue otherwise if they’ve ever seen the likes of Nick Griffin skirting around current race relations legislation simply by substituting the word ‘muslim’ for ‘paki’. Its an unsustainable position however you look at it – unless you’re a member of the BNP.”

… or a blogger at Harry’s Place.

British imam highlights increase in Islamophobia

Fear and suspicion of Muslims has increased in the European Union countries since the September 11 attacks and the problem deserves as much attention as anti-semitism, British imam Abduljalil Sajid told an international conference on racial and religious intolerance yesterday.

“Islamophobia has replaced anti-semitism as the new sharp end of racist issues in the world wherever you go”, Mr Sajid told the conference organised by the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe. According to EU findings, “hatred against Muslims increased tremendously” after the September 11 attacks, Mr Sajid said.

The imam criticised the conference’s draft final statement for not explicitly using the term Islamophobia, adding that Europe has to face the reality that millions of its people are now Muslims. Despite this, EU countries have no established system to monitor or record crimes against Muslims, he said.

Morning Star, 10 June 2005

See also Islam Online, 10 June 2005

Security targets Canadian Muslims: Report

Canadian security agencies use unacceptable intimidation tactics, aggressive behavior and threats of arrest against Canadian Muslims while investigating allegations of terrorism, according to a leading Muslim group.

The Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-CAN) has said the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) used intrusive tactics such as discouraging legal representation and threats of arrest under the Anti-Terrorism Act, to compel individuals to accept interviews.

Security officials also used to ask intrusive and inappropriate questions, give improper identification and solicit informants through intimidation, the Muslim group said in a statement, a copy of which was e-mailed to IslamOnline.net Wednesday, June 8.

“It’s safe to say that the overall consequence has been one of alienation, loss of trust in our security agencies and civil cynicism. The results are quite alarming,” said Riad Saloojee, the council’s executive director.

A survey conducted by the Muslim civil liberties group showed that Canadian Muslims were routinely singled out and harassed by the security agencies. Eight percent of respondents to the survey, which included around 467 people, mostly young Arab males, said they were “visited” by the RCMP or CSIS officials.

Nearly half of respondents said visits by security officials made them feel fearful, anxious and nervous, while about one-quarter said they felt harassed and discriminated against. “What we found was that people are very scared in the Muslim community, even the people who filled out the survey were concerned about their safety,” council spokeswoman Halima Mautbur told CBC News Online.

The survey also showed that the interrogators asked questions on how the interviewed is committed to Islam, how often a day does he pray and what does he think of the Iraq invasion-turned-occupation. “They suggested that having a commitment to your faith is dangerous in this post 9/11 world or that it could get you into trouble,” Mautbur said.

Islam Online, 9 June 2005

‘My race-hate hell’

A Muslim officer facing the sack from the Metropolitan police claimed today he was racially abused by colleagues. PC Kay Hasan, 29, was served a notice of dismissal following a series of formal complaints from members of the public and colleagues. He is fighting the dismissal, claiming he was subjected to racist insults and discrimination. In the worst incident his locker at Notting Hill police station was daubed with graffiti that read: “Clean me. I used to belong to a dirty Muzzie”. Mr Hasan says “Muzzie” is a derogatory term for Muslims.

London Evening Standard, 9 June 2005

Protest over Israel Quran abuse report

Palestinian prisoners at an Israeli prison have gone on hunger strike after reports accused Israeli soldiers of desecrating the Quran while searching Palestinian prisoners. Israeli Arab member of parliament Ahmed Tibi, who represents an Israeli Arab political party, said he received complaints from prisoners at the Megiddo prison that soldiers tore and stepped on three copies of the Quran – the Islamic holy book – while searching Palestinians and their possessions on Tuesday morning.

Al-Jazeera, 8 June 2005

See also Islam Online, 8 June 2005

Show trial in Florida

Leena“After more than two years in prison – much of it spent in solitary confinement – former University of South Florida professor and political activist Sami Al-Arian finally went on trial in Tampa, Fla., this week. There’s little chance, however, that Al-Arian will be able to get a fair trial…. This trial is part of the U.S. government’s post-September 11 witch-hunt of Arabs and Muslims.”

Socialist Worker (US), 10 June 2005

See also Islam Online, 7 June 2005 and the Free Sami Al-Arian campaign

Rights report attacks British anti-terror laws

A top European human rights watchdog said on Wednesday Britain’s anti-terrorism laws breached European standards and could force London to opt out of parts of the European Convention on Human Rights. Despite improvements, Britain still tended to see human rights as an obstacle to the criminal justice system, the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights Alvaro Gil-Robles said in a report.

He welcomed a decision by Britain’s top court which forced Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government to drop a measure allowing detention of foreign terrorist suspects without charge. But problems remained with the law that replaced it. The 2005 Prevention of Terrorism Act allows Britain’s Home Secretary (interior minister) to issue “control orders” against terrorism suspects, which restrict their freedom of movement, where they live and with whom they may communicate.

“The Act acknowledges some … of these restrictions may be incompatible with Article 5 (of the European Convention on Human Rights) on the right to liberty, in which case the possibility of derogating from the UK’s obligations under this article is foreseen,” the report said.

Continue reading

Carter calls on US to shut down Guantánamo

Former President Jimmy Carter called on the United States on Tuesday to shut down its prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to demonstrate the country’s commitment to protecting human rights.

“Despite President George W. Bush’s bold reminder that America is determined to promote freedom and democracy around the world, the U.S. continues to suffer terrible embarrassment and a blow to our reputation as a champion of human rights because of reports concerning abuses of prisoners in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo,” Mr. Carter said in a news conference following a two-day human rights conference at the Carter Center in Atlanta.
In addition to closing Guantánamo Bay and two dozen other secret detention facilities, Mr. Carter said, the United States needs to make sure no detainees are held incommunicado and that they all be told the charges against them.
His other recommendations included that the United States stop transferring detainees to foreign countries where torture has been reported and that an independent commission be created to investigate where terrorism suspects are held in American custody.
Mr. Carter also said that the United States should reaffirm its commitment to due process and international law, and assure that the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of prisoners are enforced.

Associated Press, 8 June 2005

The war against Islam

“Among the factors leading to the French and Dutch rejections of the European constitution last week, none looms more ominously than the nightmare of antagonism between ‘the West’ and Islam. Many Europeans fear a rising tide of green, both within the continent and from outside it. Where once communists threatened, now Muslims do.”

James Carroll in the Boston Globe, 7 June 2005