Don’t prosecute fascist anti-Muslim hatemongers says ‘libertarian Marxist’

BNP Islam Out of Britain“As one who exchanged blows rather than opinions with the National Front in the 1980s, it gives me no pleasure to say this. But we ought to uphold the right of the British National Party to express its views, however vile, after Merseyside Police arrested 13 of its members for distributing leaflets. I’m afraid that free speech means freedom for fools and scumbags, too.

“The BNP pamphlet doled out in Liverpool was called Racism Cuts Both Ways. You can see it on its website. It argues that everybody knows racial hatred is wrong, but that few realise that ‘the vast majority of the real racism that scars Britain involves white victims from the indigenous community’.

“It lays the blame for much of this on ‘relentless’ discrimination against British natives by ‘an institutionally hostile ruling class’ but also claims that ‘our people are the silent victims of an epidemic of racist violence, sexual exploitation and murder’ by Muslims and blacks.

“… racism is not a crime. And while police chiefs may judge ‘racist content’ to be offensive, that does not make it a criminal offence. It should not be the job of the police or the courts to outlaw any ‘ism’, idea or ideology.

“Incitement to racial or religious hatred is a crime, but difficult to prove (the BNP’s leader, Nick Griffin, was found not guilty in 2006). And rightly so. We should draw a clear line between words and violent deeds. The old playground saw about sticks and stones seems a more grown-up guide than current policy. That leaflet is arguably guilty of incitement to elect BNP councillors….

“For this old libertarian Marxist, state action against a political party, however odious, is nothing to cheer.”

Mick Hume in the Times, 25 November 2008

Continue reading

MWAW: open letter to Richard Desmond

MWAW masthead

Media Workers Against the War (MWAW) have written an open letter to Richard Desmond, proprietor of the Daily Star and the newspaper’s editor, Dawn Neeson, concerning the paper’s coverage of stories on Muslims in the past few weeks.

These stories have all appeared on the ENGAGE website and can be found in the news items and archive folders.

The letter by MWAW can be read here. To add your signature to the letter click here.

ENGAGE, 24 November 2008

Prosecute BNP says Bruce Kent

Bruce Kent“I have received, unsolicited, from the leader of the British National Party, a 12-page document supposedly setting out details of crimes against whites committed by other ethnic groups.

“One intended effect will be to increase racism in general and Islamophobia, in particular. When the document describes gang rape and teenage grooming, it says: ‘One community, however, is different. Wherever there are large numbers of young Muslim men, groups of them team up to lure girls – often as young as twelve or thirteen – into a nightmare world of sexual abuse, rape, beatings, drug addiction and prostitution … the Muslim sex gangs … never target girls from their own community.’ The pamphlet also claims that there is a refusal by ‘Muslim leaders to condemn what is going on’.

“To suggest that gang rape is a normal feature of Muslim male life and that Muslim leaders tolerate it, is not only untrue, but is designed to fan the flames of racial and religious hatred. It is certainly immoral and ought to merit criminal prosecution as well.”

Letter from Bruce Kent in the Times, 21 November 2008

Islamaphobia behind the harassment and intimidation of a British charity

The British Muslim Initiative condemns unconditionally the move by Lloyds TSB to force the Islamic Bank of Britain to close the account of the British charitable organisation INTERPAL.

While on the outside, this appears like another misguided knee-jerk premature reaction in response to the pressures of the anti-Palestine Zionist lobby, a closer inspection offers the suggestion that this is a gross example of Islamaphobia at work.

What gives the right to Lloyds TSB, recently bailed out by hundreds of millions of pounds of British Tax-payers cash including Muslims, to use such outrageous bully tactics with a smaller British bank forcing it to close down the accounts of a British charitable organisation, is beyond comprehension, unless one begins to see that the smaller bank in question is the Islamic Bank of Britain, and the charity is one that has been working for over a decade to alleviate the suffering of and providing humanitarian aid to Palestinians.

At a time when the British economy is at risk of collapse, and the need for foreign investment and the confidence of investors both at home and overseas is pressing, this move tarnishes the image of British fair play and erodes the confidence of potential stakeholders in our banking sector.

The Prime Minister’s comments during his recent tour of Arab and Muslim countries in order to solidify our economy and strengthen the positions of our banks, including Lloyds TSB, could not have made a stronger case for this particular objective.

Mohammed Sawalha, President of BMI commented on this decision last week stating: “We are still hopeful that Lloyds TSB will re-address this decision, and allow the re-instatement of INTERPAL accounts with the Islamic Bank of Britain.”

British Muslim Initiative, 19 November 2008

Mayor Johnson fails to condemn GPU smear by Policy Exchange

MuradMurad Qureshi, member of the London Assembly, questioned the Mayor of London on the briefing circulated by Policy Exchange prior to the Global Peace and Unity event this year.

Murad asked: “In view of the warm welcome you sent to this year’s Global Peace & Unity Event at the Excel Centre, will you join me in condemning the irresponsible ‘briefing’ circulated by Policy Exchange which sought to associate this mainstream and well-attended event with extremism?”

Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, replied: “I am not aware of any such briefing, so I am unable to comment on it.”

The Mayor’s Director of Policy, Anthony Browne, and his Director of Arts, Culture and the Creative Industries, Munira Mirza, are both from Policy Exchange.

PX sought to discredit the hosting of the GPU this year and circulated a briefing note urging politicians and others to stay away. The leader of the Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg MP, brought the briefing to light and wrote to Neil O’Brien, PX Director, criticising the organisation’s attempt to sully the reputation and intent of the GPU.

The Mayor’s response will seem unsatisfactory to many given the strong links between members of his administration and Policy Exchange.

ENGAGE, 19 November 2008

Children ‘bullied for their beliefs’

BeatbullyingOne in four children with a religious belief is bullied at school as a result of their faith, research shows.

The findings have prompted anti-bullying campaigners to urge ministers to make it compulsory for schools to record all incidents of faith-based bullying, as they have to do in cases of racism and homophobia.

The survey of more than 1,000 pupils by the anti-bullying charity BeatBullying, showed that 23 per cent of the pupils were bullied as a result of their faith. In addition, 9 per cent of those with a faith were bullied as a result of wearing religious symbols to school. One 13-year-old Muslim girl said: “These two girls knew we were fasting, they got me in the toilets and tried to force crisps down my throat; they were all laughing their heads off.”

Independent, 17 November 2008


Read the Beatbullying Interfaith Report (pdf) here.

The report contains many other disturbing accounts of Muslim pupils being verbally abused and physically assaulted:

“They pushed me down the stairs, kicked me, dragged me by [my] hair, broke my tooth and hit me with a chair. They said my dad did 7/7.” (Jagatveer age 15)

“They would call me Paki, tell me to go back to Paki land and live with Osama.” (Mavish age 13)

“I got called a Paki and told that my religion was stupid.” (Jabeen age 12)

“Sometimes I hear boys laughing about bombs in Iraq. They do it in front of me, laughing that more Muslims have been blown up.” (Aruni age 13)

Still, not to worry – over at the National Secular Society website NSS president Terry Sanderson assures us that these are “claims to be read with a pinch of salt”.

Inayat Bunglawala – ally of al‑Muhajiroun

More barking nonsense from David Toube of Harry’s Place at Comment is Free. Toube accuses Inayat Bunglawala of “rushing to the defence of the jihadists of al-Muhajiroun” in his recent CiF piece.

Toube continues: “In relation to my call to arrest those who are presently running al-Muhajiroun, Inayat states ‘it is not entirely clear what crime Choudhury is meant to have committed’. Let me help him out. In 2006, the government banned al-Ghurabaa and The Saved Sect, which is what al-Muhajiroun at that time called itself. They’re on the list of proscribed terrorist organisations. There is no difference between the personnel, the organisation, or the message of those groups, and ‘Islam4UK’. Indeed, the site gives Choudhury and Omar Bakri Mohammed’s phone numbers as contacts. There is no legal reason that Choudhury should not be arrested. He ought to be. I hope that he soon is.”

As AllyF points out in the comments:

“So David, you’ve now written two separate blog pieces saying that Choudhury should have been arrested for incitement and membership of a proscribed organisation, without presenting a single shred of evidence in your support.

“One of the legal problems with proscribing organisations like Al-Muhajiroun / Saved Sect is that they abolish themselves and reappear under different names. It doesn’t give the police the right to retrospectively arrest people for prior membership of now banned organisations.

“And several times now you have accused Choudhury of incitement to terrorism without producing a shred of evidence in support of the claim. I’m amused that you don’t intend to sue Inayat for libel. If I were you I would cling to hopes that Choudhury has similar intentions towards you, because accusing people of serious criminal offences without evidence can be an expensive business.”

Continue reading

Journalists speak out against Islamophobia

Peter Oborne of the Daily Mail is on Saturday (November 15th) joining a platform of journalists and Muslim leaders in London to discuss media coverage of Islam in the context of the “war on terror”.

Investigative reporter Nick Davies of The Guardian has also been added to the bill and will speak alongside the campaigning Irish journalist Eamonn McCann.

Entitled “Under Siege: Islam, War and the Media“, the conference will bring together practising journalists from print and broadcast media to address concerns over standards of coverage.

David Crouch, chair of conference hosts Media Workers Against the War, said: “We’re delighted Peter Oborne and Nick Davies have agreed to join us on Saturday – it shows just how important the event is viewed in journalistic circles.

“A proper debate about reporting Islam is long overdue. Many leading journalists now acknowledge that too often our industry has resorted to crude stereotypes of Muslims that fuel racism and extremism.

“The election of Barack Obama as US president is a result of the rejection of war and racism on the part of millions of Americans. We need a full debate in Britain about how the “war on terror” has fuelled racism against Muslims.

“Amid all the current agonising about the BBC insulting individuals and sections of its audience, can there be any area more worthy of scrutiny than reporting Islam?

“This conference will set out the issues and debate how best to campaign to improve standards. It will seek to identify the main sources of Islamophobic bias as a first step to providing media workers with tools and resources for combating it.”

Writing recently, Peter Oborne said: “We think we should all feel a little bit ashamed about the way we treat Muslims in the media, in our politics, and on our streets. They are our fellow citizens, yet often we barely acknowledge them. We misrepresent them and in certain cases we persecute them. We do not treat Muslims with the tolerance, decency and fairness that we so often like to boast is the British way.”

MWAW press release, 12 November 2008

Engage writes to the Press Complaints Commission

Poppies bannedENGAGE has sent a letter to the Press Complaints Commission concerning the headline in the Daily Star on 6 November, Poppies banned in terror hotspots. The letter states:

“The use of the term ‘banned’ in the headline is clearly inaccurate and misleading given that there is clearly no ban in operation at all. The headline obviously contravenes Clause 1 of the PCC’s Code of Practice.

“In addition, we would argue that the headline was designed deliberately to incite anti-Muslim prejudice – a practice that Richard Desmond’s papers seem to indulge in day in and day out, sadly without any censure from the Press Complaints Commission.”

The full letter can be read here.

ENGAGE, 12 November 2008