Academics refuse to spy on Muslim students

Academics refuse to spyAcademics refuse to spy on Muslim students

By Daniel Coysh

Morning Star, 31 May 2007

UCU delegates unanimously rejected government demands yesterday that university staff snoop on students suspected of “extremism.”

The repressive plans were universally condemned by the UCU inaugural congress in Bournemouth, which enthusiastically backed a motion calling on members to “resist attempts by government to engage colleges and universities in activities which amount to increased surveillance of Muslim or other minority students and to the use of members of staff for such witch-hunts.”

The massive vote endorsed the position initially adopted by the union at the end of 2006, when the plans were first mooted.

UCU general secretary Sally Hunt commented: “Delegates have made it clear that they will oppose government attempts to restrict academic freedom or free speech on campus. Lecturers want to teach students. If they wanted to police them they would have joined the force.”

In November, the government warned of what it described as the serious threat posed by radical Muslims and issued guidance to colleges and universities calling on them to monitor student activity.

But Ms Hunt added: “Lecturers have a pivotal role in building trust. These proposals, if implemented, would make that all but impossible. Universities must remain safe spaces for lecturers and students to discuss and debate all sorts of ideas, including those that some people may consider challenging, offensive and even extreme. The last thing we need is people too frightened to discuss an issue because they fear some quasi-secret service will turn them in.”

Continue reading

Fox News uses Al Qaeda tape to whip up fear and hatred of American Muslims

Rather than analyze the seriousness of the threat or the effectiveness of the US war on terror, FOX News used a recently-released video tape from an American Al Qaeda member to foment hatred toward Muslims, particularly American Muslims.

On last night’s (5/30/07) Hannity & Colmes, Sean Hannity, in his scripted introduction to the discussion about the tape made by Adam Yehiye Gadahn, read, “(Gadahn’s) involvement with Al Qaeda may no longer come as a surprise to many Americans. Remember, a poll released last week revealed that 25% of young Muslims in America say that they would condone suicide bombings in defense of religion.”

News Hounds, 31 May 2007

Students protest headscarf ban

BRUSSELS – Hundreds of students of the Koninklijk Atheneum Andrée Thomas demonstrated in front of their school this morning against the planned ban on headscarves at the institution.

The administration of the school, which has a great many Muslim students, has decided to ban all outward signs of religious convictions, including the headscarf.

The pupils were protesting because they regard the ban as a violation of free expression and freedom of religion. A number of protestors carried banners that stated that they would leave the school if not allowed to wear a headscarf.

The school administration defends its decision claiming it will contribute to social integration and encourage respect for different ways of life.

Expatica, 30 May 2007

BNP wastes police time with complaint about Muslim demo

Lancaster UAF suggests that West Midlands BNP should be charged with wasting police time over their complaint about propaganda for the “Muslims rise against British oppression” demonstration planned for 15 June outside Downing Street, which the fascists claim constitutes “an incitement to violence”. Well, they’d know all about that, wouldn’t they?

(It might be added that the posters announcing the protest have already been condemned by Adam Yosef of the Saltley Gate Peace Group as an attempt to “disrupt the harmonious relations between people of various faiths”, though like Lancaster UAF he points out that the material “doesn’t glorify or promote terrorism”. Hizb ut-Tahrir have also spoken out against the posters, arguing that “the posting of such material damages community relations and does nothing to create harmony between the city’s residents”.)

Lecturers oppose witch hunt against Muslim students – Torygraph not happy

UCU logoAcademics are threatening to derail a Government drive to root out Islamic extremists on university campuses.

The University and College Union, will ask its 120,000 members to refuse to take part in the Government-led “witch hunt”. It insists that Muslims are being “demonised” because of new guidance that asks staff to look out for students falling under the influence of radical preachers.

The Department for Education and Skills has warned university staff to log suspicious behaviour amid fears that campuses are being infiltrated by fanatics recruiting for so-called jihad. In a 20-page report published in December, ministers warned of “serious, but not widespread, Islamic extremist activity in higher education institutions”.

It asks lecturers to vet Islamic preachers who have been invited to campuses, ensure that “hate literature” is not distributed among students and report suspicious behaviour to police.

But at the UCU annual conference in Bournemouth, lecturers will warn of a “recent rise” in racism and its “apparent promotion by Government policies”. Academics at the union’s London Metropolitan University branch will say that “increasingly restrictive measures and the xenophobic language surrounding them” has led to an increase in racist attacks on Muslims.

“Islamophobia and the attempts at increased surveillance on Muslim communities are not only encouraging racist and xenophobic tendencies in Britain but are also leading to measures that threaten civil liberties,” they will warn. A motion to the conference will condemn Government attempts to use “members of staff for such witch hunts”.

Daily Telegraph, 29 May 2007

See also BBC News, 30 May 2007

Yet more on the ‘mega-mosque’

The Times reports on the proposed Abbey Mills mosque, under the headline “Setback for Muslim sect’s ‘mega-mosque’ in London“. See also the government’s response to the BNP-inspired petition warning that the building of the mosque would “only cause terrible violence and suffering”.

See also Radical Muslim which urges support for a “Build the mega-mosque” petition.

For the background see Islam Online, 27 May 2007

Anti-Islamic writer stirs hatred, Muslims warn

A visit to Sydney by a controversial Somali writer who calls the prophet Mohammed a pedophile and says Islam is inferior to Western culture has outraged Muslims, who accuse her of inciting hatred. Ayaan Hirsi Ali will arrive in Sydney today amid tight security normally reserved for foreign dignitaries or royalty. Her writings and talks focus on what she calls the backwardness of Islamic culture and the persecution of Muslim women.

University of Technology Sydney Islamic law lecturer Jamila Hussain said Hirsi Ali’s ideas were extreme and stigmatised Muslims. “I think she’d be better staying where she came from,” Ms Hussain said. “I’ve read enough of her thoughts. It’s a narrow and radical opinion, and I don’t agree with it. She’s obviously had some dreadful experiences, but they’re not typical.”

News.com.au, 29 May 2007

New sus laws against Muslims? Even the Sun is against it

Government plans for new police powers to stop and question people were greeted with a barrage of criticism yesterday, after it emerged that senior police officers had neither requested the change nor been consulted. The Home Office confirmed that the power would be included in a counterterrorism bill to be announced in early June. But the vehemence and breadth of criticism led Home Office ministers to signal a willingness to compromise after the idea was also attacked by MPs, civil liberties and Muslim groups as unnecessary and harmful.

The new powers, contained in a leaked letter from the counter-terrorism minister, Tony McNulty, to Tony Blair, would make it an offence punishable with a £5,000 fine for a person to withhold their identity or refuse to answer questions. Azad Ali, chair of the Muslim Safety Forum which works to improve police and community relations, said: “This looks like the old sus laws, and will further alienate people and exaserbate the sense people have that the community is being victimised. There are enough powers for the police to do their job.”

Guardian, 28 May 2007

“… the seemingly random questioning of young Asians, backed by the threat of £5,000 fines, will drive a dangerous wedge between them and the authorities. It could therefore sabotage a key weapon in our war on terror: Intelligence from within the Muslim community. In a few extreme cases, the disaffection it will breed could even drive youths into the clutches of the brainwashing extremists looking to recruit suicide bombers. The principle that police must have reasonable suspicion to question anyone must be upheld. Most UK Muslims detest the bombers. It would be disastrous if a new law threatened the unity of all Britain’s communities against terror.

Sun editorial, 28 May 2007

See also Melanie Phillips, who has no objection to targeting Muslims but complains that the government is proposing to “crack down on the entire population”.

Daily Mail, 28 May 2007

Muslim women are all oppressed says agony aunt

Mariella Frostrup replies to a letter from a woman objecting to the restrictive attitudes of her Muslim boyfriend:

“He’s the product of a culture that has a long way to go when it comes to accepting not only the equal rights but more worryingly the basic human rights of women. No doubt this response will be met by a barrage of correspondence from intelligent, emancipated Muslim women arguing that it is possible to be liberated, equal, female and a devout Muslim. And I’m sure it is, if your husband allows it….

“When the debate about the wearing of the hijab in schools was raised I found my principles severely compromised. On the one hand I believe absolutely in the right of any individual to express their beliefs and practise their religion. On the other, if that involves a visible declaration of inequality it’s hard to reconcile that with the world I want to live in. No matter how you spin the hijab, it cannot be described as an acceptable tool in furthering equality. I fear it’s the road down which you are heading if you don’t stop believing your boyfriend’s behaviour is acceptable and yours is not.”

Observer, 27 May 2007

Email:
mariella.frostrup@observer.co.uk
magazine@observer.co.uk
letters@observer.co.uk
reader@observer.co.uk